Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚑ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

100% Positive

Analyzed from 269 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#presentation#maybe#order#speculative#execution#going#watch#https#processor#half

Discussion (9 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

inetknghtβ€’about 7 hours ago
The best presentation I've seen about CPU performance related to pipelining, branch prediction, and speculative execution was Chandler Carruth's "Going Nowhere Faster" presentation at CppCon 2017 [0]. I do recommend watching the whole presentation, but if you watch nothing else then just watch the 5 minutes or so from the linked timestamp.

[0]: https://youtu.be/2EWejmkKlxs?t=2511

omcnoeβ€’about 5 hours ago
It also contains a wonderfully prescient question asked right at the end of the talk: "... the processor gonna speculate, doing some loads out of the bounds of the array, how does it work in the hardware that it doesn't crash?"

Left unanswered at the time. I believe Spectre was known but not publicly disclosed at this time.

smallpipeβ€’about 6 hours ago
CPUs haven't worked like that in anything but a microcontroller for half a century
alain94040β€’about 5 hours ago
Correct (well, maybe not half a century, maybe 30 years or so). I was just about to reply that I'd love a version of this that shows instructions going in and out of a re-order buffer. That would be enlightening.
risingedgeβ€’about 7 hours ago
If anyone is interested, at https://sonic-rv.ics.jku.at/ we built an educational platform for web-based simulation and visualization of RISC-V processor architectures.

Our pipeline visualization is reconstructed from real RTL traces (you can run your on programs which are simulated using GHDL).

Under examples you can find some different architectures based on the Harris&Harris book on computer architecture.

empiricusβ€’about 7 hours ago
Maybe it's just me, but the visualizations do not help me at all.
artemonsterβ€’about 7 hours ago
I am always puzzled by such articles - its actually very well made, drawings are good, little interactive pipeline animations are fine. But in order to follow it you must already know and understand what its writeen about and if you dont - the content is just noise for you.
cogman10β€’about 7 hours ago
The article does say what it expects you to know before reading. However, it has a dead link to the knowledge it wants you to know.
jhallenworldβ€’about 6 hours ago
Now do a dynamic scheduling out of order engine with renaming, 20 pipes, speculative execution and hundreds of instructions in flight. I guess you could make a multi-person game for this.