Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚑ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

50% Positive

Analyzed from 227 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#writing#bad#ignore#tropes#more#lot#thing#edit#those#llm

Discussion (8 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

calmingsolitudeβ€’about 2 hours ago
> if you edit those [LLM tropes] out, or ignore them, you can’t really argue that the writing produced by these models is objectively β€˜bad’ any more.

Well, it isn't good either and that's the problem. It's just average.

sixhobbitsβ€’about 2 hours ago
I think that's a valid take, just one I disagree with in the article. I think a lot of it is average or bad, but a lot of it is good too.

And some of it is good, but has the annoying tropes, so removing them is enough.

raskahβ€’about 3 hours ago
Written by an entrepreneur who is "currently building Ritza, a technical writing agency."

Really 100% of the time there is a direct motive for the increasingly clever AI articles that say "human output is no different!"

sixhobbitsβ€’about 3 hours ago
if you read it, you'll see I say that a lot of AI generated output is good which is directly against the commercial interest you accuse me of having.

yes, writing and engineering is my profession, so I'm interested in LLMs and ... I write about them?

rgloverβ€’about 2 hours ago
This overlap is frequently a threat to many people here. For whatever reason, unlike every other profession on earth, writing about the thing you're an expert/interested in while making money from it (or even the potential to make money) is frowned upon. Disregard it.
sphβ€’about 3 hours ago
"I'm one of the few people you'll meet who's written more books than they've read."

β€” Garth Marenghi.

He was a great author and visionary of his time. If only he had had access to LLMs...

sixhobbitsβ€’about 3 hours ago
haha interesting idea, I wonder if anyone real is actually close to that
mulr00neyβ€’about 2 hours ago
> if you edit those [LLM tropes] out, or ignore them, you can’t really argue that the writing produced by these models is objectively β€˜bad’ any more.

> or ignore them

If you ignore the bad thing then the bad thing is good. What the fuck are you talking about?