Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚑ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

0% Positive

Analyzed from 255 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#https#draft#ietf#org#www#chicken#matdoes#dev#archive#meow

Discussion (16 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

chrismorganβ€’about 2 hours ago
https://f.matdoes.dev/notice/B5MVd4KD0Oh5Rfwaoq:

> i wrote an internet standard https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-meow-mrrp-00.html (it's published on ietf.org so you know it's real and official and endorsed by the ietf)

Sounds like a reaction to the IPv8 draft, pointing out that anyone can publish anything there and it means nothing.

brianpaneβ€’about 2 hours ago
This seems ill-advised. The protocol as documented is trivially exploitable by reflection attacks. The cat next door said one meow, and now every cat in the neighborhood is wailing in response.
zdwβ€’about 2 hours ago
Dogs have the same failure mode, except also influenced by non-domesticated canines such as coyotes and wolves, so a worse attack vector.
DeepYogurtβ€’about 2 hours ago
I guess this shows how low of a bar there is for getting something in as an ietf draft. Adds context for that ipv8 post from the other day for sure
zamadatixβ€’about 2 hours ago
The author has a fun website too: https://matdoes.dev/

Complete with 88x31 buttons, sparkling star gifs, and a visit counter.

vondurβ€’about 2 hours ago
Reminds me of the chicken presentation: https://isotropic.org/papers/chicken.pdf
teddyhβ€’about 2 hours ago
Disappointingly, this draft does not reference previous important and influential work in this field: <https://isotropic.org/papers/chicken.pdf>.

(Also available in video format: <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yL_-1d9OSdk>)

hootzβ€’about 3 hours ago
Why?!
frantathefrantaβ€’about 2 hours ago
It feels like a reply to the IPv8 draft[0] that got viral yesterday.

[0]: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-thain-ipv8-00.html

cosmojgβ€’about 2 hours ago
Oh wow, yeah, this is clearly a parody of that IPv8 draft. Just look at the ASCII tables! I suppose it's a commentary on how low the bar is for submitting drafts to the IETF.
dark-starβ€’about 2 hours ago
That IPv8 one at least made sense. This one here doesn't, and it is not even funny
ectosphenoβ€’about 2 hours ago
The ipv8 one required all traffic on a network comprising 4 billion ips to go through one server. It was far from sensical.
connicpuβ€’about 3 hours ago
Can't let pilots have all the fun
goniumβ€’about 3 hours ago
because!
JesseTGβ€’about 3 hours ago
The author must be hungry.
crankoyβ€’about 2 hours ago
What is this idiotic stupid shit?