PgQue: Zero-Bloat Postgres Queue

saberd•about 2 hours ago

I don't understand the latency graph. It says it has 0.25ms consumer latency.

Then in the latency tradeof section it says end to end latency is between 1-2 seconds.

Is this under heavy load or always? How does this compare to pgmq end to end latency?

samokhvalov•39 minutes ago

(PgQue author here)

I didn't understand nuances in the beginning myself

We have 3 kinds of latencies when dealing with event messages:

1. producer latency – how long does it take to insert an event message?

2. subscriber latency – how long does it take to get a message? (or a batch of all new messages, like in this case)

3. end-to-end event delivery time – how long does it take for a message to go from producer to consumer?

In case of PgQ/PgQue, the 3rd one is limited by "tick" frequency – by default, it's once per second (I'm thinking how to simplify more frequent configs, pg_cron is limited by 1/s).

While 1 and 2 are both sub-ms for PgQue. Consumers just don't see fresh messages until tick happens. Meanwhile, consuming queries is fast.

Hope this helps. Thanks for the question. Will this to README.

odie5533•about 2 hours ago

Postgres durability without having to run Kafka or RabbitMQ clusters seems pretty enticing. May reach for it when I next need an outbox pattern or small fan out.

halfcat•8 minutes ago

So if I understand this correctly, there are three main approaches:

1. SKIP LOCKED family

2. Partition-based + DROP old partitions (no VACUUM required)

3. TRUNCATE family (PgQue’s approach)

And the benefit of PgQue is the failure mode, when a worker gets stuck:

- Table grows indefinitely, instead of

- VACUUM-starved death spiral

And a table growing is easier to reason about operationally?

cout•about 2 hours ago

I think it's great that projects like this exist where people are building middleware in different ways than others. Still, as someone who routinely uses shared memory queues, the idea of considering a queue built inside a database to be "zero bloat" leaves me scratching my head a bit. I can see why someone would want that, but once person's feature is bloat to someone else.

pierrekin•about 2 hours ago

In Postgres land bloat refers to dead tuples that are left in place during certain operations and need to be vacuumed later.

It’s challenging to write a queue that doesn’t create bloat, hence why this project is citing it as a feature.

bfivyvysj•34 minutes ago

Cool

PgQue: Zero-Bloat Postgres Queue

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion (7 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews