Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

78% Positive

Analyzed from 2167 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#search#com#ask#google#jeeves#yahoo#https#remember#askjeeves#used

Discussion (94 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

sansworkabout 1 hour ago
For a long time ask.com had one of the only Google ad feeds allowing them to programatically request ads from Google to show on their search pages and for some reason instead of implementing it themselves they used a company I worked for to do it so for some time a lot of the ads on ask.com were actually google or yahoo ads running through a random ad server I wrote. I remember having to move our systems to make sure we were in a data centre as close as possible to them and Google/Yahoo since we had (I think?)50ms to receive a request from them, contact google and yahoo for ad inventory, merge them and return it to ask to show on the page.

(This was all like 15 years ago now)

cwnyth23 minutes ago
I'd love to see a write-up of this if you ever get the chance.
sanswork12 minutes ago
There really isn't too much more to it but happy to try and answer any specific questions. I wasn't involved in the business dealings at all so I have no clue why it happened. System was originally written in PHP and I later rewrote it in Erlang as we got more sources so I could contact all the networks for ads at the same time. It was a very lightweight system the click handler was the heavier one.
sixoabout 2 hours ago
Missed opportunity to name an LLM "Jeeves" and finally live up to the vision.
johnzimabout 1 hour ago
One of the best improvements to my life was adding the following to my LLM Prompt: "Please respond as Jeeves from the P.G. Wodehouse stories".

Not only are the LLMs quite excellent at emulating the valet, the actual dynamic fits fascinatingly well. Jeeves was always both perspicacious and enthusiastic about whatever task he was given - be it ironing a shirt or seeing to Bertie's continued wellbeing.

nomilk41 minutes ago
I feel dumb but I’d not previously made the Ask Jeeves and Jeeves from P.G. Wodehouse novels connection!
wyclif12 minutes ago
I feel this reply deeply. Tremendously depressed right now.
gizajobabout 1 hour ago
I think about six months ago I commented on an AI thread to the effect of “I’m happy that after a 30 year effort and hundreds of billions spent, AskJeeves finally works as intended” - Jeeves is totally ripe for LLMing.

Completely baffling that after keeping ask.com going for this entire time (some two and a half decades of irrelevance) they shut it down at the point at which it can actually be made to work.

NewJazzabout 2 hours ago
Maybe this is a precursor to them selling the mark to someone who (at least thinks they) can capitalize on it.
harikbabout 1 hour ago
The guy who bought friendster.com lurks here
elphinstone29 minutes ago
It's a name best saved for an embodied humanobot that can do laundry, etc., too, as well as answer questions, screen calls, etc.
jerbearito22 minutes ago
WOW. 12 year old me would've loved this.
DANmodeabout 1 hour ago
You have no idea how correct you are…

Ask Jeeves launched in 1997 as a natural language query model!

and until about 2000…some people preferred it!

Edit: and after that its indexing and results were clowned ruthlessly,

but that doesn’t change what I’m saying!

pailingemsabout 2 hours ago
Two years ago I made a rudimentary chatbot/agent for our long running IRC channel using the OpenAI API as the "brain". Its nickname is Jeeves.
cyodeabout 1 hour ago
“Jeeves’ spirit endures.”

This goes hard.

While he never married or had children, Jeeves is survived by his brother software butlers Jenkins and Alfred who have asked the public for privacy during this difficult time.

buildsjetsabout 2 hours ago
Oh my, I remember the time they sent a friend of mine a cease-and-desist.

https://web.archive.org/web/20001017194117/http://www.askgee...

leke3 minutes ago
Nice, I guess nobody is going to bother my Ask Alko side project now.
oofbey18 minutes ago
Nicely done
pailingemsabout 2 hours ago
Careful you don't type an H instead of a G there.
solomonbabout 1 hour ago
Man as a teenager I was in a Day of Defeat clan with a couple of the Ask Jeeves engineers. They were really cool.
w-ll36 minutes ago
What a great game/mod on the og hl1
lldbabout 2 hours ago
It's mildly interesting that this landing page is hosted on github pages: https://github.com/askmediagroup/ask.com
tech234aabout 1 hour ago
You can also see the various rejected wordings for the page in the commit history.
qingcharles24 minutes ago
And now people submitting PRs :D
arm32about 2 hours ago
tptacekabout 2 hours ago
Was it ever good?
stingraycharlesabout 2 hours ago
None of the search engines from that era were really good. AltaVista was perhaps the best, but AskJeeves was up there and people used multiple. AltaVista, AskJeeves, Yahoo, etc. They all had their pros and cons.

Then Google arrived and showed them what a “good” search engine was like.

rsyncabout 2 hours ago
Altavista was fantastic and represented a features and usability high water mark that was never passed by google.

Full boolean operator search with "literals" actually respected, negative search terms worked as advertised, etc.

None of that ever worked properly, consistently, at google.

bandramiabout 2 hours ago
And at the time it was still an open question whether search engines or curated oracles like Yahoo would be what stuck in the long term.
helterskelterabout 2 hours ago
Around this time you also had meta search engines, which gave you the dedup'd results of all the major search engines at the time. There was MetaCrawler and Dogpile from what I remember, both of which are oddly still around.
cm2187about 1 hour ago
AltaVista and HotBot for me. Yahoo wasn't a search engine, it was a manually curated website directory (with a hierarchical structure), which was great for finding similar websites if you found one you liked.
bsimpsonabout 1 hour ago
Don't forget WebCrawler!
bsderabout 2 hours ago
AltaVista had a Java applet that would visualize the "clusters" that a search produced. You could then click on a "cluster" in order to exclude all the irrelevant ones and the search results would update.

For example: Searching on "python" would give you two obvious clusters one for "reptiles" and one for "programming languages". Clicking on the appropriate cluster would screen out all the irrelevant ones.

This is a feature still unmatched by any search engine today.

tptacekabout 2 hours ago
I remember AltaVista being the only really credible search engine prior to Google (I took a brief detour to Excite but kept going back to AltaVista). Jeeves I only remember for the freeform query gimmick.
throwatdem12311about 2 hours ago
And now every search engine has been flooded with SEO’d AI slop and they all suck again.
DeathArrowabout 2 hours ago
Alta Vista had more relevant search results than Google has now.
kwoffabout 2 hours ago
Exactly. Before google came out in I think 1998, I had several bookmarked sites like excite.com, altavista, dogpile, yahoo, and yes askjeeves. You kinda had a feeling for which one would be good for which kind of search. But then google came along...
bandramiabout 2 hours ago
Yes. When it came out it was amazing, and it forced the existing search engines to start parsing queries' intents rather than just searching for the words in them.
gizajobabout 1 hour ago
No not at all.

The whole point of AskJeeves was that you could ask Jeeves things in natural language because the landing page was a snappily dressed butler waiting to help you around the internet, but it didn’t really work so you were left disappointed every time. Still found myself using it because the url was easy to remember though. But then google annihilated it so nobody ever went back, and I guess why they dropped the Jeeves part of the url because he was less than useful.

spike021about 2 hours ago
I very vaguely recall using it right before I started using google. very early 2000s. it was ok.
bfsjjdjdfjabout 2 hours ago
During those days you were switching between 3-4 different ones to find info. They were maybe good for two weeks where I would use it alot but you always switched around and came back to it.
serfabout 2 hours ago
ask was cool because the appeal initially was to allow people to better form search queries with natural human language questions.

as far as weird search engine traits I still think ChaCha is king; it's just sort of intrinsically funny that another human being is being given two cents to find me the most relevant FarScape fansite or DIY tattoo ink guides, whatever.

DANmodeabout 1 hour ago
WAS being given

They’re done.

tempaccount5050about 2 hours ago
I think that and dogpile were the best in that short area before google took off as the clear winner.
Mistletoeabout 2 hours ago
Yeah I remember using it back in the day and getting good results.

> Unlike early keyword-based engines, it aimed to answer specific questions, acting as a precursor to modern AI assistants like Siri or ChatGPT.

> Ask Jeeves (now Ask.com) was an early search engine launched in 1996 that allowed users to get answers via natural language queries, personified by a cartoon butler mascot. Developed by Garrett Gruener and David Warthen, it focused on Q&A rather than just keywords.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ask.com

DANmodeabout 1 hour ago
Between ‘97-2000, arguably.
firefoxdabout 2 hours ago
Where do I buy it? Who wants to join me and buy it together?
jsweojtjabout 2 hours ago
I want to know what was the first and last question asked of Jeeves.
Animats14 minutes ago
Next, Yahoo Search? (It's still live.)
fudgeonastickabout 2 hours ago
https://ask.com/ is my go-to site that I know will be up, but I know will not be in my DNS or browser cache. I use it as my "wait, is my internet really working" check.

I hope the domain lives on, and that I don't want to visit it.

eresonanceabout 1 hour ago
Mine is https://www.red.com/

Been using that for so many years now, probably 20ish? Oh wow, yup, I remember this page from 2006:

https://web.archive.org/web/20060505141837/http://www.red.co...

NitpickLawyerabout 2 hours ago
Yahoo.com should be your next one :)
qingcharles17 minutes ago
I've been using yahoo.com as my test domain since 1995...! I think I used microsoft.com before that, but yahoo is easier to type.
arm32about 2 hours ago
I'd be willing to be ask.com will always resolve to a pingable IP address, that's a HOT domain name.
LeoPantheraabout 1 hour ago
I have a tiny bash script that picks four random common words from the list of the 10000 most common words on Wikipedia and tries to ping <word>.com for each.

It's quite rare to find an unregistered one.

qingcharles15 minutes ago
I did this via some sort of bash + WHOIS call in about 1995 with the dictionary file I normally used for passwd cracking. There were a lot available then.
dlivingstonabout 1 hour ago
I use https://www.example.com. I used to use Oprah.com; for some reason, that made me laugh.
waynesonfireabout 1 hour ago
Aol.com for me.
Advertisement
randfurabout 2 hours ago
No shoutout to P.G. Wodehouse for the IP?
gyanabout 2 hours ago
Yeah, what is the recognition of Jeeves/Wooster among the millennials?
jemmywabout 1 hour ago
As a millennial, the TV show with Hugh Laurie and Stephen Fry was played when I was a kid, and I've rewatched it several times as an adult and read a few of the books. Our kids have watched the show with us too. I'm currently trying to learn the theme on the piano.

I'm sure it'll continue in some niche, much like Agatha Christie, where I've seen some recent youtube vids by younger people discovering how well they're written. I like it when they say "follows the old trope of ..." and then in the comments you get "doesn't follow it, invented it".

rhdunnabout 1 hour ago
There are a few YouTube "can I solve [story] before the reveal?" style videos focusing on Agatha Christie novels ranging from around 4 years old to today.
dupedabout 1 hour ago
I was in 4th grade in 2003 when I learned search engines existed (and I have a possibly tainted memory of our Computer Arts teacher in grade school explaining web crawlers and PageRank to us). We had a Gateway PC at home and AOL, but we weren't allowed to use anything networked (I only played Civ III).

But we were essentially taught to use multiple search engines, but that was AskJeeves, Yahoo!, and Google. We liked AskJeeves because of the whimsy. Yahoo! felt too adult and Google felt too much like adults pretending to be kids.

tux033about 1 hour ago
The idea of natural-language search was early, but the brand may have made it feel less technical than it really was. https://tux.re/forum/viewtopic.php?t=212
namegulfabout 1 hour ago
You have a great and well known domain name, why not launch a GPT powered LLM on it?

It's a huge opportunity.

LowLevelKernel38 minutes ago
Can I buy the domain?
GalaxyNova15 minutes ago
truly the end of an era
colinb25 minutes ago
I unexpectedly found myself working for the UK subsidiary of AJ just before the .com bubble pop. Interesting times. Things I remember:

  I wrote something to do cluster analysis of the previous day’s search queries. It turned out that the most frequent search was something like “naked picture of $soapOperaShowActor”. Actual search query data might shake your ideas of the goodness of people. 

 Much of AJ’s content was based on editorial staff (often young journalistic folk) researching what they thought might be the highest quality answer. One day I passed the desk of a colleague who was watching porn. What now? It turns out that they wanted to be able to answer the question “best porn of $kink” for a large variety of kinks. Which meant that they also had to have a policy of how to direct queries for CP. To something less harmful obvs.

 As a corollary of the above, the editors needed a way to search for candidate results. What did they use for this? Google of course!
Via an acquisition I worked for AJ in the US for about a year before the move to the UK. It was a vivid illustration of the way in which dishonesty and backbiting could permeate an org. I knew plenty of fine individuals there, some who kindly taught me hard lessons, but as a company, a culture, it was a cesspit.

Anyway I got laid off in the great wave of 2001, was out of work for a while, did some truly awful work on supermarket planogram s/w and eventually got a gig doing IP routing. Ever since then I’ve been patronising grad hires by telling them how useful it is to have a bad job in your past. It makes it much easier to cope with occasional bad days at an otherwise good place. “Sure, my code crashes on a double exception when the reverse bcopy chokes on an unwired chunk of address space in the ARP lookup interrupt path, but at least I’m not trying to optimise the positioning of cornflakes to take advantage is this month’s promo pricing”. Good god, there was a time when I had a subscription to The Grocer magazine. Watch out kids. This could happen to you! (I also got to spend a day following a guy around the London Underground as he refilled chocolate vending machines. But I won’t talk more about that unless you buy me a beer).

rwmj5 minutes ago
Did you know Chris ("Xris") Martin? I worked with him eons ago and then I think he went to AskJeeves around 2000-ish.
treeloverabout 1 hour ago
"Jeeves’ spirit endures"

It sure does.

shevy-java44 minutes ago
I don't think I have used ask.com in the past (perhaps many years ago though), but now I am becoming increasingly troubled here - does this mean we depend even more on google search? And it constantly gets worse too. That's concerning. We need some real alternatives that don't just suddenly vanish.
chris_wotabout 1 hour ago
No more ask.com toolbars being installed without asking.
Lorinabout 2 hours ago
Would have been a great domain with the rise of AI, shocking they didn't adapt the persona.
Advertisement
booleandilemma29 minutes ago
I was so young when I first used it and remember being delighted by the idea of phrasing a search query as a question. Google came later.

Thank you for being a positive part of the web of my childhood.

EricRieseabout 2 hours ago
Pour one out
essephabout 2 hours ago
Huh. https://www.askjeeves.com is that a spoof of ask.com?
dawnerdabout 2 hours ago
I think they forgot about it
abhinavsharmaabout 2 hours ago
Did they get a great deal for the domain from an AI lab?
sgammonabout 1 hour ago
End of an era
xivzgrevabout 2 hours ago
launched 26 years ahead of its time (LLMs)!
DANmode39 minutes ago
Small language model(s).
UltraSaneabout 2 hours ago
I wonder what it was like working for them.
bsimpsonabout 1 hour ago
I only know them as a consumer, but IAC is truly one of the most scourge-of-the-earth companies. They're retreating to publish People Magazine now, but they monopolized concert tickets as Ticketmaster, and online dating as a rollup of every mainstream app in the last 20y. They also bought CollegeHumor and drove it into the ground/irrelevance.

They're a terrible company. It's no surprise that AskJeeves failed, but society is better for it.

IG_Semmelweissabout 1 hour ago
i believe they also bought vimeo and livestream.com, and proceeded to miss the boat where Youtube took off.
paradoxylabout 1 hour ago
as I recall, they hired writers and freelancers who put together broad articles that got pointed too when you asked a question, instead of trying to answer questions individually... but my memory could be off, that was 20 years ago.
avazhiabout 1 hour ago
Been using the net for 26 years and I never once used that website. Or maybe I used it once and it was so dog shit that I thought it was just a spam website.

Wonder how much they’ll get for the domain name though.