Academic Research Skills for Claude Code

aarnon about 3 hours ago 5 commentsRead Article on github.com

Discussion Sentiment

100% Positive

Analyzed from 87 words in the discussion.

Discussion (5 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

apwheele•about 1 hour ago

There needs to be a new name for people creating these with no obvious validation.

Skill spam?

AndyNemmity•28 minutes ago

Define obviously validation? What is the signal that tells you one is reasonable vs another?

I find the only way to do that is to look at it, if it passes some visual tests, try it, and then a/b test if it's any better than without it.

apwheele•6 minutes ago

So yes a/b broadly speaking is what I was saying (test cases and can show it is actually better).

Even this repo just the "b" showcase, showing the outputs as is (with no clear documentation how those were generated, is it headless in a CI pipeline somewhere?), is not good, https://github.com/Imbad0202/academic-research-skills/tree/m....

elashri•40 minutes ago

Skill-slop.

adityamwagh•42 minutes ago

SkillBros?