Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

100% Positive

Analyzed from 218 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#doctor#point#weird#request#data#years#doctors#why#shared#possible

Discussion (6 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

ionwake3 minutes ago
Weird story.

A few years ago, some UK doctors were warning civilians to request to their Doctor to "NOT be included in shareable data" for this reason.

That in itself was weird. Why would I have to ask for this?

So I did, only for the doctor - a normal english doctor in a nice place, to turn to me and say " I can, but you are either 'on the team' or you are not "

I was confused and I just went " I just rather my health data wasnt shared ".

The point isnt that at one point it was possible to request this, or that doctors "leaked that you could", or that finally Palantir finally got access - my point is, if you think about it, some random Doctor thought it was politically incorrect for me to request privacy from possible future sharing.

If most of the upper middle class think like this is, well then we shouldn't be surprised it got shared with Palantir.

In my later years I just think, it is weird how different people are.

solumunus3 minutes ago
I’m just totally black pilled on politics at this point. There’s just no hope.
repelsteeltjeabout 1 hour ago
> While broad access was originally intended only for NHSE employees with security clearance, the FT reported that the briefing noted that external workers had requested the same permissions “as it is too inconvenient to apply for all of the necessary individual CDAs”.

Let's get rid of those pesky ACLs. Trust us, we know what we're doing.

bobsoap17 minutes ago
This is why blind trust in any kind of entity governing your most sensitive data is misplaced. Laws and policy can be changed. Your identity cannot.
t0mpr1c332 minutes ago
Nothing to see here. Internal controls are working as they should. Everything is fine.
trolleski13 minutes ago
UK is done. :(