Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚑ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

50% Positive

Analyzed from 151 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#https#data#com#instructure#agreement#customers#returned#monero#www#search

Discussion (3 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

Cider9986β€’about 8 hours ago
>The data was returned to us.

It was my understanding that the data was copied[1]. You wouldn't "return" data unless it was encrypted or the originals were deleted. I am confused on this phrasing but maybe it is standard idk.

This is bullish on Monero[2]. The January pump may have been from a hack as well[3].

Here is Shinyhunters website. Canvas was listed on it[4] and then removed[5].

[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IeTybKL1pM4

[2] https://search.brave.com/search?q=monero+price&rh_type=cc&ra...

[3] https://xcancel.com/zachxbt/status/2012212936735912351

[4] https://archive.ph/4zD7f

[5] https://archive.ph/NYWbJ

dansoβ€’about 8 hours ago
Sounds like a ransom was paid:

> With that responsibility in mind, Instructure reached an agreement with the unauthorized actor involved in this incident. As part of that agreement:

> The data was returned to us. We received digital confirmation of data destruction (shred logs).

> We have been informed that no Instructure customers will be extorted as a result of this incident, publicly or otherwise.

> This agreement covers all impacted Instructure customers, and there is no need for individual customers to attempt to engage with the unauthorized actor.

Cider9986β€’about 8 hours ago