Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚑ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

0% Positive

Analyzed from 135 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#flathub#apps#app#buggy#chromium#code#should#policy#https#org

Discussion (6 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

Arrowmasterβ€’1 day ago
This has been their policy but now it's more explicitly defined. Go look through the submissions on https://github.com/flathub/flathub/pulls?q=is%3Apr to understand how bad the problem they are dealing with is.
nextaccounticβ€’about 2 hours ago
It's weird because I am sure that a large number of established apps in flathub, such as.. Chromium https://flathub.org/en/apps/org.chromium.Chromium has AI-assisted code, and this bans all AI-assisted code

The policy as it stands is contradictory with flathub practice, unless it specifies that already accepted apps are grandfathered or something like that.

weezingβ€’about 23 hours ago
Any app store should
reverius42β€’about 11 hours ago
Disagree, why should an app that works (and has AI contributed code) be banned, but not necessarily a buggy app written by a human? It's worse than a double standard.
no-name-hereβ€’about 11 hours ago
Are β€œbuggy” apps written by humans allowed? I guess it depends how buggy you're referring to, as most software (AI or not) likely has bugs.
weezingβ€’about 5 hours ago
What kind of whataboutism is this? Both should be. AI generated slop has no place in app stores same as "buggy" apps whatever it means.