Advertisement
Advertisement
⚡ Community Insights
Discussion Sentiment
100% Positive
Analyzed from 304 words in the discussion.
Trending Topics
#https#wiki#pair#org#instability#wikipedia#kind#arxiv#space#mean
Discussion Sentiment
Analyzed from 304 words in the discussion.
Trending Topics
Discussion (21 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pair-instability_supernova
I mean laser interferometers are an amazing advancement but just imagine seeing an earth-sized chunk of gold pop out of a kilonova (probably not my lifetime but eventually a human will see it happen)
Thank goodness this administration did not frack with Nancy Grace Roman Telescope, I thought the name alone would make them cancel it or rename it after him, wait maybe I shouldn't even mention that idea...
* https://science.nasa.gov/mission/roman-space-telescope/
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nancy_Grace_Roman_Space_Telesc...
If you look at image 17 you can see that a simulated aragoscope that is in our technical reach could already resolve the Jupiter moons from almost 23 light years away. I hope as well that we will have something comparable while I am still around.
[1] https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/2014_phase_i...
For reference, there are 103 known main sequence stars within 20 light years.[1]
[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_nearest_stars
The big bang created hydrogen, helium, and small amounts of lithium. Any higher elements are created by stars, and a significant presence of those "metals" will take a star down a different path than pair-instability.
Low-metalicity environments are not likely to be friendly to life.