Back to News
Advertisement
mmplappert about 15 hours ago 7 commentsRead Article on dfdxlabs.com
Quick framing, since the post is long: I did robotic manipulation research at OpenAI from 2017–2020, and the tabletop setup back then cost roughly 10x this one and took a team to run. This project is me testing whether a single person can now do meaningful work on the same class of problems: starting with physical and software setup.

A few decisions I'm least settled on, and would love some pushback/feedback on:

- single arm vs. bimanual (I went single for cost/space, knowing it rules out things like folding cloth)

- not calibrating camera extrinsics/intrinsics for now

- RGB vs. RGB-D for from-scratch policies (ACT / Diffusion Policy)

And one I'm more confident about but expect disagreement on: not building on ROS 2 / LeRobot, and writing my own stack instead. Happy to get into the reasoning.

Advertisement

⚑ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

82% Positive

Analyzed from 373 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#camera#setup#robot#lerobot#arm#robotics#cool#previous#similar#intend

Discussion (7 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

NalNezumiβ€’about 2 hours ago
Cool stuff. At my previous (startup / research) job I had to set up similar system (but with franka arm and multi view camera) alone because I was the only one with robotics background.

>I do not intend to calibrate the camera’s extrinsics or intrinsics for now.

Sensible choice, although I suggest it's good in the long run to do at early stage in your setup, especially if you intend to collect data for policy learning.

Debugging trained policies for visual manipulation task can be a headache and having as much context on variables that can change is a good practice.

My previous setup was in Japan, a earthquake prone place and I wasted some time after realizing the camera got misaligned due to earthquake. A simple solution is just to place an Aruco marker on the table that tracks the relative extrinsic position of camera, and add it as metadata to collected teleoperation dataset.

dlt713705β€’about 1 hour ago
As impressive as this setup may be, I'm still amazed at how slow this type of robot is, whether amateur or professional grade. I have no expertise in this field, but as an observer, the apparent progress in this area seems very limited. I guess my expectations are too high and my understanding of the problems to solve is too low.
mplappertβ€’7 minutes ago
It’s partially my fault I currently clip the max speed _and_ I only input soft control changes when teleoperating to avoid crashing into things. The robot itself could definitely move more quickly than what you see in the video.

It would be interesting to explore how RL can be applied on top of my (flawed) human demos to optimize beyond what I’m able to do.

avilayβ€’about 2 hours ago
Hey this is cool! I am doing something similar myself with the SO101 arm robot from Robot Studio using a patchwork of my own code and LeRobot. Would love to collaborate with you if you are open to it. You can find me on Discord as `.avilay`. https://www.linkedin.com/posts/avilay_lerobot-huggingface-ro...

Would like to know your reasoning on not going with LeRobot.

nlβ€’26 minutes ago
I'm very interested in the SO101. I've never done any robotics and that seems a palatable entry level thing to try things out.

How have you found it?

(The author does explain his reasons for not using LeRobot in the post - although "I also use LeRobot for training and running baseline policies, and the vendor SDKs for the hardware.")

wxwβ€’about 2 hours ago
Great article. I'll be following along. Would like to learn more about the robotics space.

- I've heard the advantage of ROS besides the architecture is the ecosystem (driver integrations, etc). Is that not an issue because the arm supports a Python SDK OOTB?

- Any issues you've been running into with this setup?

- How do you determine if a session recording is good enough for training? Is 50/100 samples really all you need?

timsuchanekβ€’about 2 hours ago
This is really exciting. Incredible that you can do this for this budget at home. Unthinkable a couple years ago.