Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚑ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

100% Positive

Analyzed from 165 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#always#disabled#code#using#values#boolean#represent#naming#something#gone

Discussion (3 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

jessycoβ€’18 minutes ago
This is something I've gone through and started to think about and eventually try and help others with. Working with mulitlingual people I noticed a tendency to use negative words "disabled" instead of "enabled" which always made code have !disabled everywhere. Tried the enum approach as well; Love focused writings like this to distill a lot of information into an easy to read form. the new concept for me is the `with` as in to apply functionality by extending a `with` class (this is inside an angular project). Also using types for values so when passing a value in for methods you don't get a blank true/false you get a human readable thing which is useful for debugging and building. Only care about optimizations later if it will ever matter.
JSR_FDEDβ€’about 10 hours ago
You start with a Boolean to represent two possible values/states. Then your program evolves and you need represent a third state, so what do you do? Obviously you add an other Boolean.

I keep doing that and then for several weeks I deal with the extra pain and complexity this causes. Then always, and I mean always, I end up rewriting all that code using enums.

JSR_FDEDβ€’about 10 hours ago
It goes beyond just naming Booleans, all naming of variables is hard