I Stored a Website in a Favicon

128

ttheanonymousone about 4 hours ago 43 commentsRead Article on timwehrle.de

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

69% Positive

Analyzed from 1057 words in the discussion.

Discussion (43 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

Tepix•about 3 hours ago

Instead of going via pixels, why not use a SVG favicon and directly store markup inside it and extract it?

Use this favicon.svg:

    <svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg">
    <circle cx="50%" cy="50%" r="50%" fill="orange"/>
    <p>hello HN!</p>
    </svg>

use this in your <head> to use a svg favicon:

    <link id="favicon" rel="icon" href="favicon.svg" type="image/svg+xml">

finally, use this in your <body> to extract it and add it to your document body:

    <script>
    fetch(favicon.href).then(r => r.text()).then(t => document.body.innerHTML += t.match(/<p[\s\S]*p>/)[0]);
    </script>

chrismorgan•36 minutes ago

Regular expressions? Ugh. Encode it properly as XML in the correct namespace, load it so, and take it from that.

Or just serve the SVG file and use <foreignObject> to embed the HTML, and include <link rel="icon" href=""> inside it. In theory you should be able to define a <view id="icon"> and use <link rel="icon" href="#icon">, but in practice neither Firefox nor Chromium seems to be handling that properly in a favicon, which is disappointing.

weetii•about 3 hours ago

Hey, yeah, I wrote the article. This (of course) would be more practical. Thanks for pointing it out. I wanted the payload to "live" in actual pixel data rather than hidden text inside an XML file. That’s why I went this way :)

peter-m80•about 3 hours ago

The ico file format allows multiple resolution icons, so a lot of data

weetii•about 3 hours ago

Good point, I might add a section in the article where I list alternative approaches. Thanks

berkes•about 1 hour ago

An SVG can embed raster images: base64 encoded bytes.

So you could layer this experiment: favicon is svg, that contains encoded raster, whose bytes are encoded html.

At the very least it would make a mindboggling CTF step.

Walf•about 3 hours ago

PNG has comment chunks tEXt, zTXt, and iTXt. You can have a completely normal image whose file is stuffed with as much content as you want. That is less fun, I suppose.

weetii•about 3 hours ago

Yes, that would also work, thanks for pointing it out

sheept•about 4 hours ago

You can use the favicon cache as storage too, by redirecting users across domains. It's been proposed as a potential fingerprinting risk[0], and if a browser naively reuses the cache for incognito mode, it could be used to track users across browser profiles.

[0]: https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2021/02/browser-track...

ai_fry_ur_brain•34 minutes ago

My thoughts instinctively went to "this has to be being used for fingerprinting" when I read OPs blog. Are anti fingerprinting measures taking into account the use of the canvas api with favicons?

The link to the supercookie site is dead unfortunately.

koolala•about 3 hours ago

Wasn't this fixed or mostly fixed?

franciscop•about 4 hours ago

Is this timing coincidence? I just submitted 1h (30 mins before this) ago a website I just made about storing your stock porfolio in a URL + favicon!

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48606396

esquivalience•about 3 hours ago

I found the agressively staccato, clearly LLM-generated content extremely difficult to read.

bstsb•about 2 hours ago

for the first time in a while on HN, i disagree with the characterisation as AI-generated. at most it was drafted with an LLM, but the final output is pretty human to me.

they used the wrong it’s/its, made But. its own one-word sentence, didn’t capitalise HTML, and used “okayy” in parenthesis. all of this isn’t to criticise the writer - i enjoyed it more seeing these little imperfections that make up a blog post

fortuitous-frog•8 minutes ago

Looks largely AI-written, with some human edits: https://www.pangram.com/history/9afe7542-1085-4264-9691-2172...

FWIW -- I'm not as repulsed by it as the parent comment. But I do want to substantiate that it _is_ heavily LLM-written.

(If you're unfamiliar, Pangram has garnered a reputation as the leading LLM-detector, with a minimal rate of false positives; IME this has come with the tradeoff of being easy to manipulate/tweak your way into turning an LLM-generated piece of text into reporting a false negative, but for most folks that's worthwhile.)

estetlinus•about 3 hours ago

It’s the new internet. So, so annoying.

noduerme•about 3 hours ago

Yeah, but it's kinda weird. The typical LLM headers and bullet points are there, but it's like someone took an axe to the rest of the spew. I too would rather read someone's original bad writing than their bad editing of AI writing, but it's kinda interesting how this all shakes out.

netsharc•36 minutes ago

It doesn't seem to be LLM, but reads like one. The author is German, maybe it's a language expertise thing, maybe he likes the LLM style (unrelated to his nationality).

But yeah, sentences that only have 3-4 word each feel like 3rd grade writing; I couldn't read it.

weetii•14 minutes ago

Hey, I've always written like this. In school I couldn't stand subordinate clauses and long sentences because I'd lose my train of thought. But yea, I've noticed that people often find it hard to read so I'm going to work on that

bartvk•about 2 hours ago

I wish people would include their prompts.

scottmcdot•about 3 hours ago

Which bit? The short sentences?

Izmaki•16 minutes ago

Wait 'til the author discovers that you can use ping (ICMP) to transfer data, too! :)

jorisw•about 1 hour ago

Fun Fact: You can use any inline SVG for a favicon and keep it right in the HTML document.

This also allows you to use an emoji directly as a favicon, like so:

  <link
    rel="icon"
    type="image/svg+xml"
    href="data:image/svg+xml,<svg xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg' viewBox='0 0 100 100'><text y='.9em' font-size='90'>(your emoji here)</text></svg>"
  />

(HN isn't showing the emoji)

berkes•about 1 hour ago

I'd imagine the (aggressive) caching of the favicon by browsers makes it a challenge, but you could generate the favicon dynamically, then have JS extract the sequentially. Basically streaming arbitraily large content to a webpage via favicons. Via blocks of 239 bytes.

It may be a fun, novel way to proxy webpages that are otherwise blocked. Though, i guess, the service rendering the favicons can just as easily be blocked then.

tetrisgm•about 1 hour ago

Love it. Did you see the old effort to store the page in the url? https://github.com/jstrieb/urlpages

purple-leafy•35 minutes ago

That’s awesome. I took this a bit further a few years ago making a url only notepad quine that as you add data to it, creates itself. that can be saved as a bookmarklet. Have to watch the gif to understand

https://github.com/con-dog/serverless-architecture

charcircuit•15 minutes ago

You can literally just use the file itself as the favicon. There is no need to over complicate it.

co index.html favicon.png

soanvig•about 2 hours ago

Honestly it didn't interest me, but I do remember from back in the days full websites rendered by a browser from... Empty files. https://mathiasbynens.be/notes/css-without-html

beardyw•about 3 hours ago

I would have used a minimal service worker to unpack the web data and present it as if it were just a normal page being loaded.

superjose•about 4 hours ago

Pretty cool tbh!!! Would have loved seeing the decoder code!!!

It's also pretty interesting to think how an attacker could exploit images on his behalf. Never thought that would be a way!!!

Thanks!

schobi•about 4 hours ago

I guess the decoder is more than the 208 bytes that this page uses..

But maybe you can misuse this and store a session ID / cookie in a favicon (give everyone a unique one) and survive some cookie cleanup and evade privacy restrictions?

Maybe you can still make it that the favicon looks like an image a little to not raise suspicion?

Favicons seem to be cached across private browsing sessions. Oh no

RetroTechie•23 minutes ago

I'm tempted to think that only someone working for a company in the advertising industry could come up with that.

Must EVERYTHING be polluted by ad tech & privacy intrusions?

bozdemir•about 3 hours ago

Very cool. I wonder is it possible to make a simple game with also leveraging the webassembly?

netsharc•35 minutes ago

https://violet78910.github.io/faviconSnake/

weetii•about 3 hours ago

Yes, probably. I guess, you’d need a bigger favicon since the minimal Rust WASM binary is around 20KB+ (?)

alex_suzuki•about 2 hours ago

You might find my tinkering useful: https://strich.io/blog/posts/embedding-webassembly-in-qrcode... A QR code isn’t much different from a favicon I guess. :)

laladrik•about 2 hours ago

The link is 404

neon_me•about 2 hours ago

Is it cake? Game for devs.

ab_wahab01•about 3 hours ago

Fascinating concept! Thanks for sharing this!

scoot•about 3 hours ago

Would have been more fun if the blogpost was rendered from the favicon.

fitsumbelay•about 3 hours ago

very cool and interesting after reading just the title I wrongly assumed this would be about svg

jibal•about 3 hours ago

Surprised that a minimal "website" only requires a small image = few pixels = few bytes to store it? Um, ok.

shaharamir•about 3 hours ago

Amazing!