Yeah, it's a bit of an awkward article. Just compare the paragraph headers to the paragraph contents - "Why a hex grid" and then the paragraph doesn't talk about hex grids.
It gives off of similar vibes as corporateese - like someone who kinda knows what "right/smart/good" sounds like, but doesn't or can't present something actually right/smart/good.
EDIT: Not that there isn't interesting stuff worth reading, but it does feel a little "someone put a big mac in a blender and I guess it's still decent".
johnfnβ’about 2 hours ago
The blog post is entirely AI generated.
Hammershaftβ’about 2 hours ago
I think the author is selecting good gifs and structuring arguments, but the prose is painfully AI generated.
JumpCrisscrossβ’about 2 hours ago
Cool, every kid whoβs dropped a bomb in a computer game is apparently a war criminal.
Discussion (0 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews
AI stylisms are not necessarily bad - short, punchy fragments CAN make it easier to digest some text. But it can't be all punch. In a meandering writing (like this post), it comes off as unfocused and as a blasΓ© imitation of actually focused, to-the-point, punchy writing.
It gives off of similar vibes as corporateese - like someone who kinda knows what "right/smart/good" sounds like, but doesn't or can't present something actually right/smart/good.
EDIT: Not that there isn't interesting stuff worth reading, but it does feel a little "someone put a big mac in a blender and I guess it's still decent".