Department of Commerce has lifted export controls on Claude Fable 5 and Mythos 5

359

PPragmata about 4 hours ago 154 commentsRead Article on twitter.com

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

77% Positive

Analyzed from 3514 words in the discussion.

Discussion (154 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

drevil-v2•about 3 hours ago

The damage is done. You cannot build a business critical function on top of American SOTA frontier model. Especially not with the current crew in charge.

Now whether AI tech is in the same league as say Nuclear tech and therefore by any reasonable standard should be regulated is a different question.

We hit the slippery slope on a random day in June 2026 and there is no putting the genie back in the bottle. Any exec or manager that puts load bearing weight on top of Anthropic/OpenAI/Google/AmericanCorp frontier model deserves the stress.

Sammi•about 3 hours ago

I'm a small software business owner in Europe. I have to assume my competition is willing to pay for any business advantage they can get. And so I also have to pay for the SOTA model, whatever it is.

SwellJoe•about 2 hours ago

The good news (for you and most everyone other than the current leading AI companies), the gap between the SOTA and the near-frontiers is getting smaller every week or two. The leading Chinese models are only a few months behind now (GLM 5.2 tickles the tail of GPT 5.3 or 5.4 and Opus 4.6, according to benchmarks and the vibes among heavy users who've spent some time with it), where they were a couple of years behind a year ago.

rafram•28 minutes ago

4.6 was released at the beginning of February, so if the Chinese models only "tickle its tail," that means they're >5 months behind.

parodysbird•about 3 hours ago

This is a great recipe for going out of business.

adrianmonk•about 2 hours ago

If the competitive risk is real, then are choosing between supplier risk (AI model access) and competitive risk.

When there isn't a zero-risk option, the question becomes which risk is smaller.

jasondigitized•about 1 hour ago

Any competitive business will accept this risk if it gives them any type of edge no matter the duration of that edge. This is no different that using an exotic raw material.

halfmatthalfcat•about 2 hours ago

And thus, capitalism continues to roll on. Businesses are suppose to go out of business, its a feature.

cedws•about 2 hours ago

This thinking that every task must be stuffed into the most 'advanced' (expensive) model out there is idiotic, and it's not only you unfortunately.

At $JOB I have warned higher ups we should try to keep our expenditure under control, educate people that document slinging doesn't require Fable every time and demo the capabilities of the cheaper models, and been snubbed for it. When Fable is available once again our bill is going to be eye watering, relative to what it should be.

jdlshore•about 3 hours ago

What concrete business advantage are you getting from LLMs?

echelon•about 3 hours ago

Speed.

brazukadev•about 3 hours ago

do you think your current operation and niche is so optimized that not using Fable would put you out of business? Or is this a hope that using Fable will allow you to stay in business?

cjbgkagh•about 2 hours ago

I am on track to commoditize my niche industry, and I hope I can do it before anyone else beats me to it. I'm working at panic speeds.

1over137•about 3 hours ago

Nonsense. Do you buy state of the art pens, pencils, printers, paper, computers, disks, etc.? No. You buy whatever is the best value for the case at hand. That’s often not the SOTA option.

admax88qqq•about 2 hours ago

Sure but that's orthogonal.

Yes you use the right tool for the job.

But if the job requires the best intelligence you can get with an LLM, then you use that.

Taking as an assumption that the quality of your product is a function of the quality of the inference you are using: if you use an inferior model because "what if it gets export controlled again" and your competitors don't, then your competitors are likely to win.

If you don't need frontier models for you job then this is all moot, but the thread started with

> You cannot build a business critical function on top of American SOTA frontier model

Which is silly. HN likes to roleplay bringing everythgin "business critical" in house because sometimes vendors mess up. Self host, don't use the cloud, run open models locally, built redundant supply chains in case of another covid, etc etc. Sometimes the risk is real, but most of the time the risk is rare and the cost of an interruption event is less than the cost of bringing everything in house or using lower quality vendors "just in case"

codybontecou•about 2 hours ago

Unless you have concrete evidence via evals that SOTA is actually needed, you’re just buying into the hype.

afavour•about 2 hours ago

Wouldn’t you just have fallbacks? Today’s frontier models are just better than the other models, they don’t really have a ton of entirely unique abilities that can’t be replicated with more time and effort.

So you use the frontier model, then when you can’t you accept things are less efficient. The alternative (right now) is to be less efficient all the time, I don’t see any advantage to that.

theptip•about 2 hours ago

Yeah. It’s not the end of the world.

But, it is a big own goal, because once you invest in building evals for your internal use-case, 1) it’s easier to switch your model to whatever is cheapest, and 2) it’s way easier to fine-tune an oss model.

Evals are annoying to build and most companies were fine to rest on vibes. Now many companies have to do the work for insurance.

toddmorey•about 1 hour ago

I predict we all be using the hell out of fable until the next great model comes around and in two weeks we won’t be talking about the export controls anymore. We just don’t have the attention span.

Nobody should be putting loadbearing weight on Amazon or Microsoft with their ruthless monopoly ambitions, yet here we are

rvz•about 1 hour ago

> I predict we all be using the hell out of fable until the next great model comes around and in two weeks we won’t be talking about the export controls anymore.

Until it goes down, or Anthropic raises prices again.

Fable is already expensive to use compared to GLM and they want you to use the API as much as possible so you get a worse deal.

satvikpendem•about 1 hour ago

Nah, people will still pay, as many if not most consumers truly do have a short memory. And like other comments say, imagine everyone is using Fable and you are not, you will quickly fall behind, per the Red Queen hypothesis.

boc•about 2 hours ago

> You cannot build a business critical function on top of American SOTA frontier model.

Yes 1000%, please, all my European competition please don't use mythos whatever you do it's total USA trash and the Chinese models work better anyway.

well_ackshually•about 1 hour ago

You're the perfect sucker for Anthropic. You'll never have access to Mythos, and you don't even know if it's actually Fable answering you.

satvikpendem•about 1 hour ago

Read the guidelines, you can make your point without calling people "suckers".

> When disagreeing, please reply to the argument instead of calling names. "That is idiotic; 1 + 1 is 2, not 3" can be shortened to "1 + 1 is 2, not 3."

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

blints•44 minutes ago

Most companies do not model themselves as "building on [AI model du jour]" yet. They model themselves as building products with those tools, which they consider as relatively substitutable.

fhub•about 2 hours ago

This won't age well. You just need to code in a way that has fallbacks. Whether that is to older models, different companies. It's going to be a commodity (if it isn't already).

futureshock•about 2 hours ago

I think this is black and white thinking. Fable and US AI is not unique technology. It’s just marginally better than open source tech at 10 times the price. You can swap out the models at will, they are pretty much fungible. If your use case can pay for a best in class model then you will pay for it no matter the bogeymen. If your best in class model becomes unavailable, you switch to the next best model for a very minor performance degradation. I really doubt this will deter anyone from using American AI.

softwaredoug•about 1 hour ago

The real problem is the White House just making up the rules as it goes. No laws. No predictably for the markets.

A week or so pause from seemingly legitimate cyber security concerns isn’t cause for panic. But it should be backed by laws that describe what that process should be. That would put the market at ease

catigula•about 1 hour ago

There’s no optimal answer.

The reality is this is world-ending technology and absolutely nobody knows what to do or can even agree that the problem exists.

blooalien•25 minutes ago

> "The reality is this is world-ending technology and absolutely nobody knows what to do or can even agree that the problem exists."

The reality is that the "people in power" believe it is "world-ending technology" and will therefore use it in world-ending ways. People are absolutely 100% the danger here, not the technology.

kcb•37 minutes ago

LLMs are still easily replaceable. If the SOTA frontier model provides meaningful impact for your critical business function, then worse case you flip the switch to the next most capable model.

recursivegirth•about 1 hour ago

Better to fix it now than tomorrow.

internet2000•about 2 hours ago

> You cannot build a business critical function on top of American SOTA frontier model.

Yes I can!

petcat•about 3 hours ago

Nobody cares about this temporary "ban" by the US government. If anything it only increased the mystique of the two models.

I think Europe and Canada are just happy not to be frozen out of AI access completely at this point.

andy99•about 3 hours ago

All the discussion this week have been about GLM, Qwen, etc. Both over 1000 comments in the last couple days.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48709670

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48721903

Of course Anthropic is still relevant, but people have realized they’re not special, and between this and the ID verification thing, they’ve given up a ton of their relevance vs a month ago.

modriano•about 1 hour ago

I used Fable 5 for maybe 10 hours in the window when it was available. It was much better than Opus 4.8. And I have found the Opus models to be excellent, but Fable 5 was cranking out incredible research on some data sources I wanted to plumb into my project.

I wouldn't personally pay API pricing for it for my personal projects, but I bet it's going to be absolutely slammed with usage for the next month+.

musha68k•about 1 hour ago

As everyone knows, Kool-Aid is also just mostly water.

I work in AI / infrastructure and I have never seen as much interest towards investing into sovereignty by actual deciders. Thankfully, at this point I can't see any flip-flopping / change of messaging stopping that train.

In CA/EU over the last ~15 years, one used to be perceived as a bit of a "weird systems person" by just proposing alternatives to the big hyperscalers.

So the Trump administration, hands-down, has been the greatest ally here.

In tandem, I was hoping Anthropic would be keeping "dangerously capable" models banned from "evil Chinese distillers" for as long as possible.

chews•about 3 hours ago

I bought a GLM 1 year subscription and changed my environment variables to use Claude Code... yep the same one that is using stegonography to send details about users to the model. China knows where I live, I'm not getting ripped off or rug pulled on their models either.

deadbabe•43 minutes ago

composer 2.5 is all you really need don’t be so dramatic

nlh•about 4 hours ago

Here's a copy of the letter that Commerce sent to Anthropic (note who it'a NOT addressed to...)

Source: https://x.com/AndrewCurran_/status/2072103733715194048?s=20

-------

June 30, 2026

Tom Brown Chief Compute Officer Anthropic 548 Market Street San Francisco, CA 94104

Dear Mr. Brown:

Since the issuance of my previous letters, dated June 12, 2026 and June 26, 2026, Anthropic has taken steps in close coordination with the U.S. government to address the risks associated with Claude Mythos 5 and Claude Fable 5. Among other things, Anthropic has agreed to proactively detect and address security risks associated with the models; to work diligently with the U.S. government on protocols and standards and releases for Mythos, Fable, and future models; and to inform the U.S. government of any malicious activity.

In light of these actions and commitments, as well as the Bureau of Industry and Security's evaluation of the diversion risks now presented by Claude Mythos 5 and Claude Fable 5, the controls in the June 12 letter are withdrawn. A license is no longer required for the export, reexport, or in-country transfer, including deemed export or deemed reexport, of the Mythos or Fable models.

Commerce reserves the right to reevaluate the decisions made in this letter and the necessity of reimposing a license requirement, should circumstances change or should Anthropic fail to adhere to its commitments.

If you have any questions about this letter, please contact me or the Under Secretary of Commerce for Industry and Security, Jeffrey Kessler, at (202) 255-1864.

Sincerely,

Howard W. Lutnick

------

ryandrake•about 2 hours ago

"Taken Steps"

Looks like Anthropic paid the Danegeld. Now they'll never get rid of the Dane.

dboreham•about 2 hours ago

South of Watling St you're ok.

bpodgursky•about 1 hour ago

I mean, they did eventually get rid of the Danes.

nickandbro•about 3 hours ago

Jeff is now going to have to change his number. Can’t imagine all the calls or messages he must be getting now

killingtime74•24 minutes ago

You don't think public officials have official numbers?

Jblx2•about 4 hours ago

For those who haven't been following this closely, who is the missing addressee?

nlh•about 4 hours ago

Dario Amodei (Anthropic's CEO) had previously been directly liaising with the government and apparently it wasn't going well.

Avicebron•about 3 hours ago

Any news why?

chatmasta•about 3 hours ago

Mildly surprising they lifted export restrictions for Mythos too. Isn’t that Fable minus the safety layer?

dzy2617•15 minutes ago

It was likely a dealbreaker for Anthropic, since the export control excluded Anthropic’s own foreign employees from being able to access Mythos internally. Naturally, this makes model development hard.

Bilal_io•about 2 hours ago

Presumably they reached a backdoor agreement.

standardUser•about 2 hours ago

You're suggesting a for-profit company both hobbled it's own product and is actively lying about doing so. The only way that's true is if the Trump admin has crawled all the way up Anthropic's ass. But by all accounts, this is just another 10% effort by Trump and friends.

colechristensen•about 3 hours ago

Presumably there are different levels of safety. I assumed Fable was a nerfed Mythos, and not just via safety harnesses but actual model degredation.

s3p•about 3 hours ago

I don't think this is the case just because of the 'fallback' method they described, where suspicious requests are routed to Opus 4.8. If the model was degraded for certain categories of knowledge, then they'd probably be fine letting the model answer to it. IMO, of course

ls612•about 3 hours ago

Anthropic claims the only difference is the draconian bans on cybersecurity and biology queries.

naturalmovement•about 2 hours ago

> note who it'a NOT addressed to

The CEO is also not the addressee of shipments of urinal cakes.

There is a deep, deep ignorance of export controls on HN, and I fully expect it will play out as another 500 comment thread of snark and incorrecting each other while blaming the government and not understanding a word of it.

FWIW an Empowered Official is not the person who cleans the espresso machine.

electriclove•about 1 hour ago

Ha! But sorry, Dario has failed at this part of the job. It’s good that Tom is there and that there is plenty of other strong talent there.

naturalmovement•about 1 hour ago

Dario's job is to be a cheerleader.

He likely does not have the domain knowledge nor is authorized to be the recipient of such a letter.

And that's ok. His role is to hire others competent in export matters. It's a learning experience for them.

woeirua•about 4 hours ago

How many people are going to call Jeffrey Kessler? lol.

softwaredoug•about 1 hour ago

The real problem in all this is lack of predictability. The White House is just making it up as it goes along. Investors, customers don’t know what the process is and can’t plan.

In the end, we need actual laws that tell the market what kinds of models get paused / analyzed, how long that pause can be, etc.

Otherwise there’s no standard and it will be easily abused and prevent investment in US AI companies.

sv123•about 1 hour ago

Just wait till Anthropic and OpenAI are public, the admin is going to be manipulating the shit out of those with model approvals and denials.

dzonga•about 3 hours ago

Chinese models brought the building down.

are export controls the right thing ? Probably not.

but the american economy is over-exposed on "A.I" - the capital expenditure, while the Chinese are proving you don't need to spend tons of capital to get close to the frontier.

the Chinese have better building capacity & cheaper energy. that means the market has to correct at some point.

villish•about 3 hours ago

It's a little too later for export controls. Chinese models have made massive gains through legitimate research but also being trained on billions of tokens from Claude/GPT. The politicians have no idea how to stop that from happening so they pull the only lever they know.

zamalek•about 1 hour ago

Also, don't forget that we're only here because the clown-in-chief cut them off from GPUs - forcing them to make do with inferior hardware (and hence superior ideas). I have no doubt that any controls would only make China stronger.

kcb•about 3 hours ago

You really think China doesn't have massive amounts of capital expenditure related to AI? They're actively bootstrapping an entire chip industry.... https://www.reuters.com/world/china/china-prepares-295-billi...

xmprt•about 2 hours ago

Relatives vs absolutes. America will spend $500B and because of leaky pipes that's effectively 100B going directly to what's needed. China gets a lot of bang for their buck so even if they're spending a fraction of the US, they make it worth their money.

enraged_camel•about 1 hour ago

China’s chip industry is 7-10 years behind, and that is because they are desperate and have been throwing money at it. But technological progress requires more than just money.

dakolli•about 3 hours ago

I trust Chinese companies with my data way more than the corporations of the 4th Reich.

nickv•about 3 hours ago

I bet you that nothing changed with how Fable 5 is run.

"Anthropic has agreed to proactively detect and address security risks associated with the models" LOL, this was already happening.

This clown car administration just keeps making shit up and then backpedalling in a way that just leaves everything worse.

avaer•about 4 hours ago

I shudder to think what the definition of "malicious activity" is that they will be reporting to the government. Speech has been severely chilled the last couple of years.

It's nice that the restriction is going to get lifted but I hope this doesn't make anyone complacent that their coding work is going to be scrutinized by the US government, with AI, when using these models.

dwaltrip•about 1 hour ago

Fable was such a clear improvement. I can't wait to start using it again.

Opus 4.8, you did a lot of good work for me, but in the name of all things holy... I will not miss your communication style. So long and thanks for the fish.

nelox•about 3 hours ago

> We’ve received notice that the Department of Commerce has lifted export controls on Claude Fable 5 and Mythos 5.

We'll begin restoring access tomorrow, and will share an update soon.

We’re grateful to our users for their patience, and to everyone who worked with us on redeploying the models.

https://x.com/anthropicai/status/2072106151890809341?s=46

stavarotti•about 3 hours ago

I just finished reading Incorruptible and a central theme (Anthropic is a case study) is that trust is singularly the most important currency a business has. The past few weeks have done wonders for Anthropic’s marketing but just as much if not more damage to the trust factor. Businesses will continue to use Anthropic because it’s the default and accessible where it matters (AWS, Azure, GCP, Databricks, Snowflake, etc). But the trust factor has dropped. It’ll be interesting to see if they can turn the tide. Maybe Fable will be too awesome for people to care about the past few weeks?

enraged_camel•43 minutes ago

>> The past few weeks have done wonders for Anthropic’s marketing but just as much if not more damage to the trust factor.

I don’t agree with this at all. IMO Anthropic has shown that that are willing to take even significant financial hits in order to stand up to their values and mitigate what they consider to be dangers and risks. Some people don’t like that or think it’s just marketing. But that’s exactly what Incorruptible is about: companies that are willing to take a stand, even in the face of overwhelming pressure from competitors, shareholders and naysayers.

dakolli•about 3 hours ago

Most people don't care about trust anymore, we live in a low trust society where this is to be expected. People gladly line up to be poisoned by fast food restaurants and trade 1/3 of their life for pieces of paper on a daily basis.

tmpz22•about 3 hours ago

Silicon valley may be a low trust society but I havent given up hope on the rest of it yet.

satvikpendem•about 1 hour ago

After COVID at least in the West, I have.

indigodaddy•about 2 hours ago

Q: If/when Fable decides to nerd down to Opus on requests it deems dangerous, will we still pay the Fable API token rate?

zmj•about 1 hour ago

Thank you to the folks that navigated the maze in the dark to make this happen.

satvikpendem•about 1 hour ago

So it seems like David Sacks was right that the US government only really got involved because the Amazon/ AWS CEO complained about latent security threats [0] and that the government was reluctant to actually issue the export control.

[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48529358

Pragmata•about 4 hours ago

>We’ve received notice that the Department of Commerce has lifted export controls on Claude Fable 5 and Mythos 5.

>We'll begin restoring access tomorrow, and will share an update soon.

>We’re grateful to our users for their patience, and to everyone who worked with us on redeploying the models.

From Anthropic on Twitter

woggy•about 3 hours ago

Hopefully GPT 5.6 soon

scriptsmith•about 2 hours ago

Definitely took longer than I was expecting, then after two weeks I thought we'd never get it.

mateenah•about 3 hours ago

I wonder if it's still good

matheusmoreira•about 3 hours ago

Yeah, good question. I wonder if they fixed the obnoxious safety classifier too.

osti•about 3 hours ago

If anything that'll be more obnoxious because they have to show the government that it's safe.

matheusmoreira•about 3 hours ago

Isn't the warrantless mass surveillance enough?

gowthamsaiyadav•about 3 hours ago

My only hope is that they don't overdo the guardrails. Claude's been one of the best coding models, and it'd be nice if it stayed that way for real and legitimate developer workflows.

Cider9986•about 3 hours ago

https://xcancel.com/AnthropicAI/status/2072106151890809341

https://archive.is/HSIxa

https://archive.is/BbxA1

https://megalodon.jp/2026-0701-0918-51/https://x.com:443/Ant...

drivebyhooting•about 1 hour ago

When is Google coming out with an equivalent Gemini model?

impodimium•29 minutes ago

Huh did not expect them to lift restrictions this soon.

matheusmoreira•about 3 hours ago

Good to hear. I was going to cancel my subscription if I couldn't use Fable. No point in paying Anthropic to train models I can't use.

Sabinus•about 3 hours ago

The classic chaotic governance model and creation of an uncertain business environment by the Trump admin in the most important industry for the US economy.

dakolli•about 3 hours ago

If this is the most important industry for the US economy, the US is screwed. and .... Hopefully you're correct.

In past Empires kings bet their entire nations future on the words of soothsayers , people who said they could predict the future. It seems like Machine Learning engineers are the magicians of Empire of the modern age.

Sabinus•about 3 hours ago

>If this is the most important industry for the US economy, the US is screwed

Depends on how economically useful AI turns out to be. It will be useful, but it needs to be VERY useful for the current valuations.

>In past Empires kings bet their entire nations future on the words of soothsayers

I think AI's rise is much closer to the story of factory machines and computers than to soothsayers and emperors.

tinypak•about 3 hours ago

I see, so that explains why people are starting to talk about Claude Fable 5 and how I'm now going to have to buy $6,000 of compute for our startup

dakolli•about 3 hours ago

How to light 6k on fire.

standardUser•about 2 hours ago

Better than a foosball table and kegerator.

fmdv•about 3 hours ago

Fable was (is) a major leap forward for my development tasks. The quality of the model compared to Opus 4.8 (when I last used it before the ban hammer) was night and day. Fable single-shotting complex and complete applications was a beautiful thing and I can't wait to get back to developing with it.

All aboard the hype train!

HDBaseT•about 3 hours ago

The question is how lobotomized will it be now?

tjohnell•about 3 hours ago

Who knows - this could be the last model we see from Anthropic. Or it just becomes the wild west and we figure it out as we go.

alex_anglin•about 3 hours ago

Isn't it the wild west already?

On a lark, I asked Claude to compare AI to the wild west a while ago. It raised three points of similarity:

- Land-grab economics

- Lack of regulation

- Changing social and professional attitudes.

Whatever it is, it's a wild ride regardless.

Tenoke•about 3 hours ago

For non-Americans especially it does look possible to be the last one.

laidoffamazon•about 3 hours ago

So how much did they have to donate to the MAGA PAC for this one?

HardwareLust•about 2 hours ago

That's what I was thinking, the check finally cleared.

modriano•44 minutes ago

So, uh, any chance us Claude subscription people are going to get the 11 days of Fable 5 access (at non API pricing) we were deprived of?

poopyscoopy•about 3 hours ago

Debating if I should re-sub to the Max plan now (in case they grandfather people in some how) or if I should just wait and see what they announce.

Sabinus•about 4 hours ago

Chaotic governance model and uncertain business environment by the Trump admin as usual.

estearum•about 4 hours ago

Hey it's a perfectly pro-business environment as long as your business kisses the ring vigorously and continuously with perpetually escalating intensity.

natch•about 3 hours ago

They need Lehane or… since OpenAI got him, what is Fabiani up to these days?

tamimio•about 3 hours ago

So after this publicity they got, they will release a locked down version of the models, did I get that right?

sgc•about 3 hours ago

Sounds more like they are implementing mass surveillance and reporting whatever the US Gov wants for 'security reasons' back to them.

matheusmoreira•about 3 hours ago

Weren't they already doing that since the beginning? Fable released with a data retention policy. I assumed US government surveillance was the reason for this.

tamimio•about 3 hours ago

Yeah, it feels like a honeypot at this point. Gonna go with GLM instead

rvz•38 minutes ago

Smart thinking.

Havoc•about 3 hours ago

So much for way too dangerous end of the world

vlian2088•about 3 hours ago

>Anthropic has taken steps in close coordination with the U.S. government to address the risks associated with Claude Mythos 5 and Claude Fable 5. Among other things, Anthropic has agreed to proactively detect and address security risks associated with the models; to work diligently with the U.S. government on protocols and standards and releases for Mythos, Fable, and future models; and to inform the U.S. government of any malicious activity.

ah, I see. so, Chinese models are getting banned soon.

jknoepfler•about 2 hours ago

Almost as though they were indefensible bullshit to begin with. I wonder who extorted whom and for how much.

Like gee, that was fast. If this had any bearing on reality, one would imagine the vetting process would take actual time and that there would be a real, material difference between what we knew then and what we know now.

The cartoon bullshit theater is exhausting.

unchocked•about 3 hours ago

w00t

colesantiago•about 4 hours ago

This is great news,

I'm sure many teams couldn't do their best work because Claude Fable 5 was unavailable.

I wonder what their hiring pages look like now, are they starting to remove job postings?

rocketpastsix•about 3 hours ago

there is no way Fable and Mythos had such an impact in such a short amount of time that people were hiring based on it.

colesantiago•about 3 hours ago

They certainly are now that the export ban is lifted.

ungovernableCat•about 2 hours ago

They haven’t even restored access yet lol, they’re doing that tomorrow.

esseph•about 3 hours ago

... Care to explain your thoughts on this?

I'm absolutely fascinated.