Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

59% Positive

Analyzed from 1835 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#water#data#meta#centers#system#where#article#don#closed#more

Discussion (65 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

Catloafdev•about 3 hours ago
Is it really that expensive to not do stuff like this?

I guess 'turning the entirety of the American public against data centers' is not something they factor into the cost analysis.

beloch•about 3 hours ago
This is one of the data centres that went to the extra expense of building a closed loop cooling system that would, supposedly, not waste water on a continuous basis. Apparently, even these are not so clean to set up. Governments are going to need to start paying more attention to the commissioning process apparently.

--------

"Meta said that it's supporting its general contractor, Fortis, which stopped discharging and began hauling wastewater offsite"

--------

Governments should also watch where this wastewater is being hauled to, and likely just dumped.

andrew_lettuce•about 3 hours ago
This closed loop system needs to be filled and flushed, which is the operation discussed in the article. The bacterium was described as a possible airborne hazard if used for irrigation, it's not a regulated substance though so dump and dilute might be perfectly safe.
beloch•about 1 hour ago
Might be. Might not be. To put it another way, would you want this waste water diluted and dumped in a lake you swim in or a river you fish in without proper study and regulation?
hamdingers•about 1 hour ago
> began hauling wastewater offsite

They towed it outside the environment.

derekdahmer•about 3 hours ago
Testing for an extremely rare bacterium is not the bare minimum. In fact even the water treatment plants rarely do it. They admit in the article we don’t even know whether or not the bacteria originated from the water supplied by the city that entered the pipes in the first place.

DCs should be responsible for their output but this seems to be a super edge case.

kccqzy•about 2 hours ago
Not do what? Not discharge the water with bacterium? But the data center claims that their independent testing shows that they didn’t even discharge the bacterium. It seems that neither the city nor Meta knew where the bacterium came from.
washadjeffmad•about 1 hour ago
Yeah, unfortunately.

Effluent and wastewater companies have been getting greedy. If one suddenly 100x's your cost, you're fucked until you build onsite treatment or find a way to ship it out.

jstummbillig•about 2 hours ago
Is this a common problem? I would assume not, since it lead to a suspense, and that is probably very expensive and something you aim to avoid.
stainablesteel•28 minutes ago
it's incredibly hard to identify microbes like these, this is not a simple task, especially if you're not aware they exist or that they can occur in this way.. if they did, which i'm skeptical of
kibwen•about 3 hours ago
By definition, externalizing a cost is less expensive than internalizing it; the only recourse for the rest of us is forcing them to properly internalize their costs.
vlian2088•about 1 hour ago
'turning the entirety of the American public against data centers' is a blatant public opinion campaign ran by people and entities who didn't give a damn about data centers up until 3 years ago.
anon7000•41 minutes ago
Well, it turns out people started noticing local community impacts when new data center construction absolutely exploded 2-3 years ago.
jubilanti•30 minutes ago
Not just exploded, but went full on "move fast and break things". Nobody complained about the data centers that have no more impact on the local environment that a warehouse. But in all this rush, they're cutting corners everywhere and putting so much strain on the electric grid. Many also have massive onsite natural gas turbines, some big enough to power a small city, built by the contractor with the lowest bidder, half a mile from people's houses. You can hear and FEEL them from inside a house.
vlian2088•33 minutes ago
you have numbers? I asked a chatbot and the numbers I got were underwhelming.
smrtinsert•about 3 hours ago
Move fast and break things isn't a mantra that arose from first principles, it's literally all they know how to do
stephenlf•about 2 hours ago
As a former microbiologist, this news is important but not too concerning. It’s good that we found detected this and can respond accordingly. It doesn’t mean indicate an immediate, critical issue.
bentt•about 1 hour ago
Move fast and break things is back.
jmyeet•about 3 hours ago
Since the article doesn't make this clear, let me explain.

The cheapest (and worst) option is to take in water, use it for cooling and then dixcharge it. Why is this bad? Because DCs don't want to corrode their pipes with untreated water so they add coolant and additives to it, which pollute the water. This is bad. But nobody really does this because you don't want to keep adding additives to water you're constantly discharging.

The next step up are varying degrees of what's called "closed loop" cooling. That is, the DC has treated water in a closed loop that isn't discharged. There's a heat exchange system with external water. This btw is the system that's used in nuclear reactors although nuclear reactors will be far more stringent than DCs are. Best practice for this is one of Google's DCs in Scandanavia that uses ocean water for heat exchange. There are limits to this but there's only so much Arctic Ocean water a DC can meaningfully heat. It is potentially disruptive though and that needs to be considered.

Even so pipes will need to be cleaned. There is debris that builds up and in cases like this you can still get bacterial outbreaks. This is another reason to use additives like chlorine. But again, you don't want to discharge chlorine into bodies of water.

I'm reminded of water management in the Yukon. The Yukon for over a century have been gold fields. If you look at the tech required to extract a tiny amount of gold from a large amount of earth, it's kind of fascinating but it boils down to using a lot of water and having the denser gold sink and get trapped.

So gold miners take in water from rivers, wash rocks with it and then have historically just discharged it back into the rivers. This tended to be heavy in silt that would go into waterways and could create problems. The water was also dirty. So the Yukon authorities have gotten increasingly stricter with water management. Now water has to go through a series of settling ponds so the discharged water is clean/clear.

I kinda think we need similar levels of strict water management for DCs. No discharged coolants and clean water. Figure out how to get that. If that makes your DC more expensive then that's a "you" problem.

latchkey•about 3 hours ago
Omen AI just got $31m to solve this problem...

https://techcrunch.com/2026/06/29/omen-ais-plan-to-optimize-...

bix6•about 2 hours ago
Interesting I’ve been waiting for something like this on our rivers. Hopefully.
delegate•about 4 hours ago
A bit meta - the names in this article made me chuckle: Goat Systems, Cowboy State Daily, Cupriavidus gilardii, Frank Strong the Board's Manager and the Crow Creek and Dry Creek facilities. This is gold for a comedy sketch :)
nine_k•about 2 hours ago
Often life doesn't just imitate a movie, but imitates a goofy movie.
mertleee•about 4 hours ago
This is why datacenters in central texas are desperate to build anywhere in the edwards aquifer... so they can get "free" water from natural springs (already stressed by draught) and dump the effluent into city wastewater systems.
ButlerianJihad•about 4 hours ago
[fnord]
functionmouse•about 4 hours ago
it's not a consolidation because all those computers are still in office parks and the like. This is new usage, and it consumes exponentially more resources than all of the previous usage.
hn_throwaway_99•about 4 hours ago
Man, I wish I had more downvotes. This is not just about consolidation, it's about massive resource usage in areas where hardly any of the benefits accrue to the locals.

Just look at the proposed data center in Utah. It was originally proposed to be larger than Manhattan, use more electricity than the entire state uses, in a place that already is suffering a water crisis. And for what? So a few connected politicians can get bribes, and AI money can be made by people thousands of miles away, while meanwhile AI takes the jobs from people that actually live in Utah (not my words, these are the words of folks like Amodei and others actually building this stuff).

Pretending this is just a consolidation of servers currently living in office closets is laughable.

donmcronald•about 4 hours ago
You're describing a shift from a decentralized system with autonomy and competition everywhere to a centralized system where a few tech billionaires control everything.

All of these guys benefited from owning computers and using the computers owned by universities and now they're trying to convince us we should pay them for every bit that gets processed.

No thanks. I don't want that. I'd rather see the tech industry collapse and go back to pen and paper.

lioeters•about 3 hours ago
Found a good phrase to describe the situation:

> "I'm all right, Jack" is a British expression used to describe people who act only in their own best interests, even if providing assistance to others would take minimal to no effort on their part.

> The phrase is believed to have originated among Royal Navy sailors: when a ladder was slung over the side of a ship, the last sailor to climb on board would say, "I'm all right Jack; pull up the ladder."

> The latter half of the phrase has been used to call out unfairness and hypocrisy on the part of those who are seen to have benefited from opportunities handed out to them, only to deny such opportunities to others.

jazzyjackson•about 3 hours ago
I don’t know why you’re phrasing it like it’s not a big deal that these juggernauts are attempting to make themselves indispensable.
measurablefunc•about 4 hours ago
How do I, as an ordinary person, benefit from Meta's data centers? I don't have any presence on Meta's platforms & the only time I even notice their existence is when someone sends me a text message via signal for some viral link on one of the social networks.

I think you're overestimating the relevance of these data centers for regular people. They can get by just fine w/ localÂą & a lot less environmentally destructive computational resources.

Âąhttps://solidproject.org/

simianwords•about 3 hours ago
> How do I, as an ordinary person, benefit from Meta's data centers?

From the taxes they provide

measurablefunc•about 3 hours ago
I've never seen a cent go to any service in my local municipality from Meta's taxes & whatever does end up in the city coffers is not big enough to have any real effect b/c those services could just as easily be financed by direct payments instead of some circuitous route of federal, state, & sales taxes from transactions enabled by corporations like Meta.

If I was in SF & working for Google or Meta then maybe you might have a point but I'm not in SF or any major metropolitan area so from my perspective the whole thing is actually a net negative.

rcpt•about 4 hours ago
People in London buy Instagram ads to sell products to people in Birmingham and that money comes into the US. There are plenty of ways for you to catch some of it.
simianwords•about 3 hours ago
This is downvoted but factually correct way of looking at it. The benefits of Meta are convoluted and hard to state in ways that are quantified to simple numbers. (Well you can - Meta contributes ~0.25% of USA's GDP which is enormous)

For example, what is the benefit of google existing? Sure you can do google searches. You can use maps. But can you quantify it?

The benefits of living in a society that respects pluralist values is that even if you personally have never used Instagram ever, you still respect what it provides for broader society.

Its easy to give a popularist argument against anything you don't like - "how does it benefit me?!". Well it need not, but others use the products.

On a side note: I'm glad to live during times where we respect pluralist values. I hate football and find it mind numbing. But its great that those people can have their fun and joy without having to convince me. And I can have mine with League of Legends.

rahimnathwani•about 4 hours ago
'regular people' use YouTube, Facebook, Instagram etc.

Even you use HN.

Not everything can be local.

My friends and family aren't going to be convinced to use a Jitsi instance running in my house (where I pay $0.35/kWh).

lioeters•about 3 hours ago
I always imagined the HN server running on a single machine in some basement, running a magically efficient Lisp program that easily handles millions of requests per second.
littlestymaar•about 3 hours ago
> Even you use HN.

A website that runs on an infra that could sit in a cupboard under the stairs serving hundreds of thousands of users with very small loading time.

> My friends and family aren't going to be convinced to use a Jitsi instance running in my house

> (where I pay $0.35/kWh).

Using an old phone or laptop as server means you'll end up with a single digit annual electricity bill for that.

eska•about 2 hours ago
People would love to build their own servers (and run AI or other workloads on them) and kids would love to build their first PC, but big tech is buying all the hardware and stuffing it into data centers. You make it sound like they asked for it.
KennyBlanken•about 1 hour ago
Nobody is "missing" anything. There are migrations to the cloud, but AI growth is on top of that.

AI computing capacity is doubling every seven months. https://epoch.ai/data-insights/ai-chip-production.

bix6•about 4 hours ago
> after tracing a rare bacterium in the city's reclaimed water to Goat Systems LLC, the entity Meta uses to build its Cheyenne campus

Hey where’s that person from yesterday who argued with me over the 1m vs 1cm hole in the boat?

Everyone saying stop talking about data center water use is missing the entire point as this article shows.

jatora•about 4 hours ago
Data center water use is a fairly separate topic from what this article covers. Related of course but the conversation on USE centers around actual volume use, not contaminants.
lostlogin•about 3 hours ago
It’s not a separate topic though, as this article shows. A closed loop system can still mess up the water supply, because (in this case) it wasn’t fully closed.
theyreallhere•about 4 hours ago
Discharge, is part of "water usage". Arguing otherwise is embarrassing.
jcheng•about 4 hours ago
According to the article this is a closed loop cooling system, once it’s up and running it doesn’t use any water. They run water through it during installation and that’s the discharge that they found bacteria in.