How to sequence your own DNA at home

111

bbilsbie about 5 hours ago 32 commentsRead Article on bradleywoolf.com

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

60% Positive

Analyzed from 716 words in the discussion.

Discussion (32 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

munib_ca•about 3 hours ago

> This is intended to be read by AI- please just copy and paste the URL of this and have ChatGPT walk you through it. If you have AR glasses, even better, since the AI can walk you through the whole protocol.

What kind of magic is going on here, am I missing something?

alwa•about 1 hour ago

I suspect the intention is to give specific but dense notes with minimal explanation, on the theory that the LLM will fill in the appropriate hand-holding along the way

__MatrixMan__•about 2 hours ago

I've bee thinking about starting a company where I fish roots out of your sewer and identify the plant (by sequence if necessary) that you have to kill so your sewer doesn't collapse as soon as it otherwise would.

$100 to stave off that $10000 sewer replacement for a few years would be worth it to a lot of people

cowthulhu•7 minutes ago

That’s a really clever idea, I would definitely pay for that in the right circumstances.

Now that I think about it - could you just pour some sort of biodegradable broad-spectrum herbicide down the drain to get the same effect for cheaper?

hahahaa•31 minutes ago

Hard to get a plumber to knock on my door for under $100. Maybe you mean $500? Or is it $100 for the lab bit only?

fragmede•about 1 hour ago

Do it!

purpleidea•19 minutes ago

I like the privacy conscious aspects. Apart from the obvious issue of "run it through Claude" how many of those referenced analysis tools are entirely open source or at least run locally? Would have liked to see that in the article.

Aurornis•about 4 hours ago

I wish this had some discussion of the results. The earlier reports about this sensor and process were very mixed. It’s a cool process either way, but I’d like to know how usable the real world output can be.

dwa3592•about 3 hours ago

This is so cool. Thanks for doing this. The fact that we have this in a palm sized object is just crazy. Also, if/when we have a similar sized device for doing CRISPR .... umm i should stop here - it's becoming the plot of Gattaca

mephux•about 4 hours ago

https://www.the-odin.com/whole-genome-sequencing-30x/

If you want it quick and cheap(er) - 599.00

drdaeman•about 4 hours ago

If it's an US-based lab, aren't they subject to CLIA with all its retention requirements?

For $7.5k+ you get a guaranteed privacy (as other comments suggest, other properties may vary, but at least the data never leaves your home).

vibrio•about 3 hours ago

I suspect there is a deep sequencing service that is non CLIA and cheap. True. they may not be trustworthy with the data. That said, there are steps here where the data is put into Claude. Do we trust that ?

tzumby•about 3 hours ago

I would never trust that. Instead I would use Claude to teach me genomics and build the tools to process and interpret data locally

j45•about 1 hour ago

A service is not the same as the equipment

armanj•about 2 hours ago

one main marketing leverage of 23andMe, AncestryDNA, etc are fulfilling the curiosity of people who want to know which part of the world their genes are from. I guess that dataset should be preparatory.

TurdF3rguson•about 2 hours ago

I'm too afraid I would learn something awful about myself.

whatever1•about 4 hours ago

What is the accuracy in this ? Aka if I run the experiment 10 times how many differences will i get? I don’t have a physical sense on what would be a good number.

myhf•about 4 hours ago

You would get a lot of differences, but the errors would cancel each other out with enough depth of coverage.

This technology's baseline accuracy is around 95% per base, so 10x reads of every segment in the sample would give >99% accuracy for each base after aligning the reads with each other.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coverage_(genetics)

Jules-Bertholet•about 4 hours ago

> so 10x reads of every segment in the sample would give >99% accuracy for each base after aligning the reads with each other

This assumes random errors, which IIRC isn't the case for Oxford Nanopore.

Jules-Bertholet•about 4 hours ago

Oxford Nanopore unfortunately has a high error rate (3-5%) compared to other sequencing technologies. And the errors are non-random

SilentM68•44 minutes ago

Reminds me of the Gloing Plant Project. I never got my glowing flower but would have settled for the instruction manual, also never created :(

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glowing_Plant_project

By the by, can't seen to bring up the actual site linked on this post.

metalman•about 4 hours ago

I am very impressed with the, why wait? just do it now approach to the future. which while not here, IS there.

dekhn•about 3 hours ago

Nothing about this is the future. Sequencing at home will not solve any major problems. It's mainly a fun exercise to demonstrate that sequencing has been commodified.

ngsevers•31 minutes ago

I disagree, I sequenced with nebula genomics years ago.. you can understand risk factors for various problems so that you can start interventions that make sense way in advance.

ElenaDaibunny•about 1 hour ago

just a hobby project for now,pretty wild that this can be done at home.

fragmede•43 minutes ago

Knowing exactly why I have high LDL because of a specific mutation on my DNA is very much the future, imo.

bleepblap•about 4 hours ago

> This is intended to be read by AI

Fuck this

tclancy•about 2 hours ago

Man, doctors thought they had it bad before. For just a six yards I can play Peter Thiel at home! $6k invested so I can set an AI in YOLO mode to tell me I have some hyper-specific version of kennel cough?

“But that occurs in dogs?”

“You’re right. Let me look into actual gene sequencing instead of just guessing. I think the N is the load bearing letter.”

hahahaa•28 minutes ago

As long as the AI doesn't brush its teeth all good.

asveikau•about 3 hours ago

Yeah that's weird. The instructions are not even hard to read. I don't understand what an LLM would add to this.

SuperSixFour•about 3 hours ago

Literally left the article to come here and say this.