Advertisement
Advertisement
⚡ Community Insights
Discussion Sentiment
40% Positive
Analyzed from 530 words in the discussion.
Trending Topics
#llm#saying#retro#psp#game#communities#same#anyone#here#bait
Discussion Sentiment
Analyzed from 530 words in the discussion.
Trending Topics
Discussion (14 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews
This comparison seems backwards? Also I have no idea what it means - it seems like really strange phrasing and I can’t seem to make sense of it. Does anyone understand what was trying to be conveyed here?
I'm not saying Claude's take on the HR manual corpo speak is Ralph Waldo Emmerson, but maybe your issue is with the kind of click bait shit that front pages in any era?
Anyway, the article is saying there is some native host bindings for each platform, which get swapped between PSP and Desktop. However, same JS app code is running on both, calling out to the injected bindings. It's a common pattern for portability of game engines and stuff.
I haven't verified any of this, I'm just saying it makes perfect sense to me. I hope that helps.
They've written a reasonably non-trivial 3D game in TypeScript and got it running on the PSP with 24MB of RAM and basically an obsolete CPU at 60fps.
“When dang and tomhow ban all of us humans, only bots will remain”
So I’m afraid we’re responding to a bot face palm
It’s a demonstration of running web technologies (on the front end, and rust on the back) on a device that was never meant to accept them. And to run something outside of the assumed capabilities of the hardware for that era. I found this very interesting to be honest
What do you mean by “communities”? There was no enthusiast Council of Nicaea where all people who like old hardware met and unanimously decided that LLMs are bad and their work not to be valued. I see plenty of “retro”-adjacent work done with LLMs posted here to a generally warm reception.
Are you just referring to the views of an extended sphere of enthusiast mutual friends that you know?
I’m not saying you’re right or wrong. I’m saying you aren’t adding anything to the discussion of the technology itself presented in the write up.