Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

68% Positive

Analyzed from 3998 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#bot#cloudflare#mouse#bots#human#more#google#movement#https#jitter

Discussion (141 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

Havocabout 8 hours ago
It’s a bit alarming how cloudflare is establishing itself as arbiter of all things bots…both on blocking and allowing.

Doesn’t seem healthy for the internet as a whole

postalcoderabout 7 hours ago
Gonna zag here. If you take a step back, cloudflare has been paving the path for pay for crawl. I think it's a noble and ambitious goal.

While I can understand why you would be alarmed, I can point to almost two decades of lamenting on this forum about how we need better ways of rewarding content creators than ads. Well, this is it.

Moreover, these products weren't built in a vacuum. Most threads about Anthropic and OpenAI have complaints about how these companies were built on stolen content. There's a reality we have to face here and we can't have it both ways.

halJordanabout 5 hours ago
Is it a better way though? The problem with ads has always been their abusive nature. From unrestrained pop ups and clickjacking in the 90s to today's pervasive surveillance and profiling.

Cloudflare turnstile is a pop up. This product is pervasive surveillance. It having a cf logo doesn't change that or ameliorate the many many abuses that two decades have shown are part and parcel.

RedRocketFlashabout 2 hours ago
What's incredible is that you have businesses paying CloudFlare to stop their content being ingested by AIs (OpenAI, Anthropic, Self-operated scrapers).

And at the same time, they're paying SEO experts to make that same content easier to be ingested by systems (Google and other Search Engines) which use it for their own AI offerings.

Are you going to be able to make your online content available to Google Search but unavailable for Google Gemini?

fragmedeabout 1 hour ago
Yes. Google obeys robots.txt. Set yours to disallow Google-Extended and they won't train Gemini on it.
skybrianabout 8 hours ago
Yes, but it’s up to their competitors to build competing services.
cryo32about 8 hours ago
I think it's up to their customers not to encourage consolidation.
grim_ioabout 8 hours ago
Microsoft is the proof that customers do want that, or that they don't have a real choice.
Tade0about 7 hours ago
Customers shouldn't have to micromanage every service and product like that.

We have antitrust regulations for such things.

Catloafdevabout 8 hours ago
What Cloudflare competitors offer a similar range of services?
skybrianabout 8 hours ago
That too, but they need competitors to switch to.
shimmanabout 5 hours ago
No, it's up to the people to regulate tech companies into submission.
Catloafdevabout 8 hours ago
They're creating optional opt-in protection layers for the services they operate.

I genuinely don't understand these generic complaint comments.

Are you complaining that they offer too much? Or do you believe nobody is offering similar services?

stuartjohnson12about 8 hours ago
The complaint is that the offer is a great deal with no downsides for consumers, and this is likely to result in Cloudflare having a lot of power (which they currently don't have) as a market maker. This position as market maker would grant them the power to extract economic rent from the web economy by charging both sides of the web provider and web consumer market to get access to the other.
Catloafdevabout 7 hours ago
So the complaint is that one day they have such a strong monopoly that they can freely turn evil?

Just want to make sure I understand the real issue here, because that sounds like a lot of fearmongering to me.

hopppabout 8 hours ago
It's business as usual and it's our job to vote with our wallets.
jppopeabout 8 hours ago
Agreed, but we should be honest, the internet today is far from healthy
cryo32about 8 hours ago
Apart from handling of abuse reports. Yeah we're acting as CDN for this phishing site - we'll just inform the upstream about it and do nothing.
ianm218about 8 hours ago
For any one of their product there is a good opportunity to build an open source alternative or something like it! Can be hard to work around they have the benefit of being able to have negative unit economics on lots of infra products... But people succesfully built tons of alternatives to google analytics and similar.
raleghabout 7 hours ago
Open source for bot protection specifically would be difficult. If I as a bot developer can see the tests you run I can just modify my bot to pass them (either trivially or by brute force).
essephabout 8 hours ago
What they are doing requires both physical and digital infrastructure spread throughout the globe. It's not a cheap task.
whatjustinabout 7 hours ago
Unfortunately a common occurrence in the world. Not really a fan of cloudflare selling to both sides.
dzongaabout 7 hours ago
have you considered the alternative ?

where bots run rampant ?

trust me as an operator - I'm grateful Cloudflare exists.

Maxionabout 8 hours ago
To be frank, their products do work and are sorely needed.
LoganDarkabout 6 hours ago
It's really telling that they're starting to block anything automated ever that hasn't gone through their ID verification process. It's like literally every company that exists in the world is taking advantage of the dystopia at once
mark212about 6 hours ago
no, they're giving tools to their customers who can choose freely to block or not block bots. Without those tools, the people who run sites and offer content are just flying blind. I struggle to see how this is a bad thing in any way
baqabout 8 hours ago
...but very bullish NET. who wouldn't want to be the toll booth where you collect money both ways
sudbabout 8 hours ago
Cool product launch, though it feels a little weird to me that Cloudflare sells agentic products alongside this new service that seems designed to block agentic usage of the web?

I expect there's much more going on than just mouse path detection but I can imagine that this is already tricky for touchscreens and for people using non-traditional mouse inputs (the thinkpad nub comes to mind - but it would also be bad optics to accidentally block people using accessibility mouse tools as bot users, though then this becomes a loophole for agentic browsing!)

In general though I think this is almost definitely a good thing to reduce agentic bot abuse & spam.

skybrianabout 8 hours ago
It’s less weird if you think there’s a difference between good bots and bad bots. They can provide services for good bots to use while helping people keep out the bad ones.

If a bot is simulating mouse movement but doing it badly then that’s a strong signal of shenanigans. A good bot will obey robots.txt and do nothing to hide that it’s a bot.

pryelluwabout 8 hours ago
Who gets to decide what is a good bot?
pythonaut_16about 8 hours ago
Presumably the site owner with Cloudflare providing enforcement.

Generally isn't a good bot one that respects robots.txt and is respectful of the site's resources by not being spammy?

wmfabout 6 hours ago
According to their plan, the good bots pay for scraping.
wnevetsabout 8 hours ago
by checking which follow robots.txt?
nullpoint420about 8 hours ago
Cloudflare, apparently.
tccoleabout 8 hours ago
Me… obviously
mcmcmcabout 6 hours ago
The problem is they have a strong incentive to consider any bot they get paid to host as a good bot, and they can bully competitors by declaring bots they host as bad bots
skybrianabout 6 hours ago
Arguments based on incentives can prove anything. We could just as easily say they have incentives to provide tools to both sides and let them fight it out.

It would be like Gmail automatically whitelisting email from other Gmail accounts or blacklisting email from competitors. Why should Google do that? Their customers are mostly strangers to each other and they want spam filters that work well.

nozzlegearabout 8 hours ago
> Cool product launch, though it feels a little weird to me that Cloudflare sells agentic products alongside this new service that seems designed to block agentic usage of the web?

Feels a little bit like the mob selling "protection" to shop keepers.

amirhirschabout 7 hours ago
I implemented all of this in hCaptcha 6 years ago, not just to distinguish bot from human but also to recognize the keyboard/mouse behavior of the same person signing up for many accounts or testing multiple credit cards. This kind of abuse detection was a part of Cloudflare when they switched to hCaptcha in 2020 and I had thought they already implemented all this themselves four years ago when they transitioned away from hCaptcha in 2022.
Chu4eenoabout 7 hours ago
Didn't recaptcha v3 also do this? iirc the "silently monitor in the background" was part of the selling point.
akerstenabout 8 hours ago
control+F accessibility no results

Yeah so this mouse movement astrology is going to completely lock non-sighted/keyboard only users out of large swaths of the Internet isn't it.

abirchabout 8 hours ago
I'm guessing it's going to lock the non-sighted//keyboard only users out of the anonymous Internet. I'm guessing if you log in and give up your anonymity they'll consider you not a bot.
RedRocketFlashabout 2 hours ago
If that's true, attackers just need to run their bots under registered throwaway accounts...
thomastjefferyabout 6 hours ago
That's even worse
bogdanabout 5 hours ago
Why worry? Just send them a photo of your ID and you'll be fine. /s
sudbabout 8 hours ago
I'd imagine that mouse movement is just one signal among many that's weighted appropriately, but I hope we get feedback from these users
nojsabout 7 hours ago
I mean CF already forces 5 minutes of motorbike identification on anyone not in a whitelisted western country, so a small percentage of blind people is unlikely to worry them.
randunelabout 7 hours ago
They don't do that, but they do force endless loops of checkbox ticking onto users from unwanted countries https://imgur.com/a/AzNSreV
Uzazoabout 5 hours ago
Are you using Chromium? They block that - retry in Google Chrome.
eastdakotaabout 7 hours ago
You’re confusing us with Google. We don’t have a visual CAPTCHA.
seba_dos1about 5 hours ago
Yeah, you just have spinners that keep refreshing the page and spinning when you're using Firefox or a mobile device that's neither on Android nor iOS.

Potato potato.

DrammBAabout 8 hours ago
cmd+F mouse movement 3 result, 3/3: "Mouse movement is just one example of the signals Precursor evaluates"
kingleopoldabout 7 hours ago
just like how smartphone developers, engineers locked people with no smartphone.Some of the users that can no longer get services are really old people, disabled. In some well developed places on earth, you can't even check in flights without a smartphone, it's not even possible to travel for them.

Yet all people are ok with it

stanfordkid34 minutes ago
I'm sure they are doing more than looking at mouse movements, but I don't think this is a compelling approach -- I think human movements could be faked pretty easily using a large corpus of real world behavioral data. It's an adversarial game but the level of intelligence we are approaching with AI this can be solved IMO.
cjbarberabout 6 hours ago
This (agent detection) is now a kind of emerging space. Obviously it'll get much more important, too.

Other products in the space:

- Foil (https://usefoil.com/), I'm biased, a friend is building this

- Kasada https://www.kasada.io/

- DataDome (https://datadome.co/)

- Castle (https://castle.io/)

- Fingerprint (https://fingerprint.com/)

- HUMAN (http://humansecurity.com/)

- Google Cloud Fraud Defense, which is basically the updated reCaptcha (https://cloud.google.com/security/products/fraud-defense?hl=...)

- this, Cloudflare Precursor

It seems like some of the main reasons people care so far are:

- Preventing automated credential stuffing

- Preventing bots from creating a bunch of fake accounts (eg free trial abuse, which can also lead to high twilio SMS bills!)

- Reducing payment fraud

- Blocking LLM scraping

- Blocking automated scalpers (!) eg for tickers or sneakers

I'm curious to see which use cases end up dominating as the reason companies care about this. And I'm hopeful that my agents will still have good ways for me to browse and do things on the web on my behalf - eg detect agents and route them to an agent path, rather than blocking them.

(I'm interested in tools for detecting AI agents and seeing how this shifts as bot traffic goes way up.)

lukewarm707about 1 hour ago
happy to offer a counter of some great products for anti-bot defeat:

https://brightdata.com/

https://www.zenrows.com/

https://www.capsolver.com/

https://scrapfly.io/

hundreds of millions of residential ips, human browser fingerprints, custom browser binaries, auto solve of turnstyle, recaptcha v3, kasada, datadome, AWS WAF, etc if they come up.

cjbarberabout 1 hour ago
Bright Data ranks #1 on Foil's leaderboard [1], but is still detected. ScrapFly is #4 and ZenRows #7. And I guess Capsolver isn't really a scraping thing but is more just for the captcha component.

I think it'd be good if there were more products that did a better job of making an actually undetectable agent, but doesn't seem like any exist yet.

[1]: https://usefoil.com/research/stealth-browser-leaderboard

lukewarm707about 1 hour ago
i guess more people should use foil...big recaptcha, cloudflare challenge/turnstyle etc is 95+% bypassed, take your bets on how long this new cloudflare holds out
harrylepotterabout 3 hours ago
Darwinium (darwinium.com) is another example. Approach here involves a combination of profiling and step-transition probabilities; idea is that a customer can ring-fence a particular area of a digital estate where they might want to challenge or block an agent - eg a payment, due to chargeback risks. Precursor at least for now seems more focused on site scraping multiple docs from the same site.
reluctant_devabout 8 hours ago
What prevents bots/agents from just adding "jitter" to their movements that mimics how humans move their cursor?

I know there are other signals being used but this one in particular seems like it wouldn't be hard to beat with a small amount of sophistication from the bot.

nerdsniperabout 8 hours ago
Beating this would require a large amount of sophistication, not a small amount.

Basic machine learning clustering will expose bots mouse+keyboard+touch behavior and discriminate them from humans.

It will also likely discriminate against anyone with a disability and therefore using affordances like eye tracking. Just imagine how different a person with only one hand would look compared to a “typical” user!! This shouldn’t be too much of a problem in the USA because no one is enforcing the ADA at the moment outside of California / Illinois / NY.

But I’m curious to hear from ‘eastdakota how they plan to guarantee that users with disabilities won’t be affected by these kinds of behavioral analysis. Cloudflare has such a massive footprint that it’s absolutely critical for them to err on the safe side of filtering, assuming they desire to be ethical.

The immoral thing for cloudflare to do would be to say “we just provide a ‘bot likeliness score’ and it’s up to each website to decide what threshold they need”. And then wave their hands and say “we’re not the ones blocking users with disabilities…the websites are the ones setting their thresholds too strictly”.

When you reach Cloudflare’s size … you own all the 2nd and 3rd order effects of your decisions.

This kind of data not only separates bots from humans - it’s pretty trivial to distinguish male vs female, right-handed vs left-handed, approximate age, native language (based on keyboard input patterns), state of injury (including tracking progression of healing), and a variety of different mental/physical disabilities. How one navigates a website tells you whether they are ADHD or schizophrenic or has Parkinson’s, and it can tell you about drug use/abuse: how well is this person’s Parkinson’s treatment working? What days of the week does that person tend to abuse amphetamines?

It is super difficult to mimic all of these signals in a way that would cluster the same as typical humans.

SoftTalkerabout 8 hours ago
We used to say the same sorts of things about LLM prose, music, and image generation. Now just a few years later it can be very difficult to know for sure if something is made by AI or a human. There are still tells, but they are much more subtle and harder to spot, and models are still improving. Mimicing human mouse movement won't be any more of a challenge.
gobdovanabout 4 hours ago
Humans are very inefficient when it comes to navigating the web, but also take actions pretty fast when completing forms. You don't really need advanced ML to see bots spend two seconds to read a full page, then spend 10 seconds just to click two buttons a human would click together in under 2 seconds. The amount of sophistication in bot detection peaks at about 'if user searches 20 queries in less than 5 minutes on our search engine and uses incognito, CAPTCHA them'.

Because of this, perfectly mimicking humans is not a good goal for a bot (as it is the case for AI in music), because they would become very inefficient, at least latency wise (throughput could be engineered around by scraping many unrelated webpages in parallel).

lossoloabout 7 hours ago
> It is super difficult to mimic all of these signals in a way that would cluster the same as typical humans.

Not really, beat ML with ML. I won't disclose how to do it, because who knows who might read this, but you can easily do it with a model trained for that purpose.

nerdsniperabout 4 hours ago
Sure - it's just hard for rando's to get tons and tons of real human interaction data to run a GAN against. "How to do the training" isn't the barrier for this, and not worth keeping a secret.
stronglikedanabout 6 hours ago
Does anyone besides me try to beat the jitter to fail the captcha? It never works, and yet I continue to try.
fwlrabout 8 hours ago
The jitter you add has to specifically be “jitter that mimics human cursor movement”, which is extraordinarily non-trivial to synthesise.
SAI_Peregrinusabout 8 hours ago
No, it's "jitter that mimics human cursor movements detected by Cloudflare's Precursor script". It'll just be another arms race.
sbarreabout 7 hours ago
Like any other detection system you will always have determined adversaries that put in the work to bypass it.

But that doesn't mean you shouldn't still try to block the much larger number of less sophisticated/resourced adversaries that are using OOTB libraries and low-effort setups.

justinhjabout 7 hours ago
are you sure it's non trivial? they posted a 2d image of what it looks like. a fairly simple model of the users wrist and mouse position doesn't seem crazy hard but the devil is in the details
stogotabout 8 hours ago
In 2027 how many tokens will we spend to create the jitter, pre-jitter planning, post-jitter verification, and then cloudflare’s inevtiable counter-jitter
RedRocketFlashabout 2 hours ago
"We got this Trace-Buster-Buster-Buster that's gonna bust the Trace-Buster-Buster and bust their .... uh, uh, uh ... Trace!!"
zdc1about 8 hours ago
Someone needs to vibecode a "virtual mouse" tool for the agents to steer instead (semi /s)
RedRocketFlashabout 2 hours ago
Not even. If this is being detected by client-side JS, someone can just reverse-engineer that code, and push a stream of signals into CF to emulate what a human user would generate.
teravorabout 7 hours ago
that's actually how you do it. adversarial systems like those are prime candidates. one agent develops detection mechanisms and the other agent defeats them. progression signal is easy to get.

and you bootstrap with existing javascript detection engines.

the challenge is usually the human input data, your objective is to be clustered among the humans and for that you need to know what humans look like.

this is not an open ended arms race, it will end once the bots approximate humans to a sufficient degree - false positive rate for detection will become unacceptable even if the detection system is slightly ahead.

kyproabout 8 hours ago
There's always been an arms race in anti-bot technology and more sophisticated bots.

I'm sure, they can add a jitter, but then you just change how you detect / weight detection.

zuzululuabout 7 hours ago
Nothing. But you are already at a disadvantage because Cloudflare has seen far more real jitter data and you are up against that. It might work in the short term but after a while you start showing pretty obvious patterns. There's also a great variety of jitter data on specific websites or layouts that would be very easy to catch someone artificially emulating jitter
TrackerFFabout 8 hours ago
One interesting aspect is of course that the movement from the same user can be different depending on what type of mouse they use. I use a mouse at work on my PC, touchpad on my private laptop, and thinkpad nipple on work laptop. Three different profiles for one user.

Obviously different movements from a AI, but if we come to the day where mouse movement fingerprinting becomes another gatekeeper, there could be some interesting outliers.

nearlyepicabout 8 hours ago
I can’t wait for cloudflare to sell data on how well my wrist is working to my insurance company. What a wonderful hell we’ve created for ourselves.
piterrroabout 3 hours ago
I think in 10/20 years from now, access to the Internet will be allowed only upon personal identification. Every website will be allowed to ask about your identity upon serving any content. Thats the only way I see this is going. The internet as it is right now does not have a future if majority of traffic will be done by agents. Thus, the cost of that traffic will have to be put on the users and since displaying ads doesnt make sense to agents, a paid access will be introduced (which is what cloudflare is slowly doing)
yencabulatorabout 1 hour ago
How about we make browsers not report mouse movement to the page? This is getting way too creepy.
Advertisement
dubcanadaabout 8 hours ago
There is nothing stopping a bot from moving their cursor like a human. This is basically just putting up a door with zero walls and telling people to stay out of your house.

All of these things are completely abusable/bypass-able and just annoying for actual humans who trigger flags.

swiftcoderabout 7 hours ago
> There is nothing stopping a bot from moving their cursor like a human.

Sure, we could write a library that slows the bot down and makes it move the cursor in procedurally-generated curves with a certain degree of noise added... but its all extra work, and it all slows the bots down. Presumably they wouldn't reveal that part of the secret sauce if it was all of the secret sauce

dubcanadaabout 7 hours ago
Acting like a human is something scapers already do. Using residential proxies, using latest Chrome user agents, not moving/typing as fast, etc. This is just 1 more layer, moving mouse naturally.
bigbuppoabout 4 hours ago
And at some point they'll just use slave labor in some country with lax laws around all that.

I'm not sure if I'm talking about the scrapers or Cloudflare at this point. Probably both. Probably the same pool of forced laborers.

Chu4eenoabout 7 hours ago
there are already stuff to trick mouse movement profiling, since its used by other bot protection stuff.
pllbnkabout 8 hours ago
I have been noticing a lot of Cloudflare false positives where it keeps spinning on my sessions never actually redirecting me to the underlying page. If they keep just vibe coding and releasing a new solution every day, I am afraid it will be reflected in their services quality.
mialabout 8 hours ago
Sometimes it might be your user agent, or your IP, or some browser extension…
dubcanadaabout 7 hours ago
I get flagged way more often on Starlink then I did on my local ISP fiber.
bigbuppoabout 4 hours ago
It's the odd latency changes. You'll see the same thing with certain streaming services.
kube-systemabout 3 hours ago
I've seen it happen with a grocery store website, oddly enough.
khursabout 8 hours ago
Cloudflare has a lot of enterprise customers. Selling bot check to companies wanting to protect their content & also taking a cut out of payments for access by bots could be a good earner for them.
linksbroabout 6 hours ago
The examples of mouse movement, really reminds me what bot scripts looked like for Runescape back in 00s-10s. Early scripts were color-based and jumped the mouse around, and those were quickly caught. But over time, bot scripts developed into complex orchestrations; taking breaks, doing random actions spontaneously, moving the mouse naturally, logging sessions on different platforms (mobile, PC), even responding in chat.

There's been plenty of effort put into mimicking realistic / "human" behavior in writing video game bots, and every video game still has tons of bots despite the best efforts of the game devs.

You definitely can't win against bots - but you can definitely make the entire "game" (web at large, in this case) worse off for everyone else through this "always-online DRM" parallel.

bigbuppoabout 4 hours ago
I can 1000% guarantee this will adversely impact assistive technology. You can tell it will because they don't mention any testing with regards to assistive technology.
cdrnsfabout 6 hours ago
Great. More surveillance, slow browsing and turnstile-style false positives to blanket the web.
tavavexabout 7 hours ago
It's a bleak world in terms of bots flooding the web, but out of all possible solutions, this seems to be preferable over invasive and identifying fingerprinting that everyone wants to roll out. Here's hoping that mouse movements aren't sufficiently unique as to be fingerprintable too.
kurtoidabout 8 hours ago
how does this interact with keyboard navigation & accessibility tools?
trunnellabout 7 hours ago
I dislike bots as much as anyone else... when weird inquiries come through my company's lead form, it costs some time and attention to sort them.

But what makes Cloudflare so confident that automation always equates to "fraud and abuse?" If I send my agent to go retrieve some information, do they consider that fraud?

If I block various ad trackers does that trigger their "bot detection" incorrectly? Do I have any recourse? Or is Cloudflare appointing themselves judge, jury and executioner?

And let's not forget this little chestnut: > 4. Privacy by design. Precursor was designed to collect signals that help to distinguish human patterns from automated and abusive patterns.

Ahh, so to "protect" against bots they're standing up a whole new regime of user surveillance and session-level monitoring. And they definitely won't be selling that, they promise. Got it.

This crap should be illegal. In the real world, I can authorize others to act on my behalf. The same should be true with software agents.

altairprimeabout 5 hours ago
I can’t wait for Cloudflare to decide my musical-rhythm enhanced typing and extraordinarily rapid and repeatable-pattern captcha clicking are somehow machine signifiers just like Google does: If I complete Google captchas at full speed it decides I’m a robot and challenges me endlessly, once 29 times in a row in two minutes or something. That’s what I get for having excellent spatial reflexes and mouse-clicker practice from Q3A sniping. So exhausted of the reversion to mediocre tendency of anti-bot systems, sigh.
bigbuppoabout 4 hours ago
You also screwed up by using Firefox. That's the #1 method Google uses to prove someone is a bot. If you are't participating in the Google panopticon, you are suspect.
altairprimeabout 4 hours ago
I haven’t used Firefox for personal browsing for maybe ten years or more now, so I’m not sure where this is coming from.
bigbuppoabout 3 hours ago
It was an assumption based on personal experience.
Advertisement
erikvanoostenabout 7 hours ago
Your keyboard and mouse rhythm and timings are probably so unique that they can be considered PII. Wonder how that works out legally.
timcobbabout 8 hours ago
Gosh, this is all pretty nauseating.
dinklebergabout 8 hours ago
I wonder how it'll handle those of us who try and use the mouse as infrequently as possible. I imagine the cognitive delay part would be largely telling. But it'll be interesting to see if I start getting blocked because I use vimium.
SoftTalkerabout 8 hours ago
I think it doesn't really matter, the bots will adapt with much more human-like mouse movement very quickly.
PessimalDecimalabout 8 hours ago
Is this equivalent to Google Cloud Fraud Defense? https://cloud.google.com/security/products/fraud-defense
Chu4eenoabout 7 hours ago
Yes, this is something almost all other anti-bot/fraud prevention solutions already does, and there are already bypasses developed simulating human mouse movement.

I expect this will be effective for maybe a day.

eth0upabout 8 hours ago
Not sure, but I struggle with skepticism for anyone who blocks archive.today, which cloudflare does, along with nextdns and others. Being blocked by such a large... apologies in advance for 'lack of better word' vernacular, cartel, is a near death sentence.

Not a fan

nerdsniperabout 8 hours ago
CF doesn’t block archive. Archive poisons CF. Explanation direct from the CEO of CloudFlare: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19828702
pestsabout 8 hours ago
archive.today was running a DDOS through their CAPTCHA page
eth0upabout 8 hours ago
Although the blocking of archive.today goes back years, as can be verified through forum searches and archives with nextdns and others, I was not aware of this and have no excuse to dispute it. But for the record, the blocking predates 2026 by many years -- and my own records also verify this. That said, I think I need to learn more.
nullcabout 8 hours ago
please drink verification can to continue
arm32about 8 hours ago
Your children are now in custody of Carl's Jr.!
freedombenabout 8 hours ago
As a real user who uses an Ultimate Hacking Keyboard with the mouse layer, this frustrates me immensely. Yes I'm a corner case, but this is likely to make certain website not work for me because my lines are perfectly straight and my arcs zig-zag much like a bot might.

Considering the keyboard/mouse layer feels like an advancement to me, this feels like tech that will lock in the "old" way of doing things.

I really detest how adversarial the web is getting. I'm not a cloudflare hater but please, please consider people like me when rolling out stuff that affects millions or maybe even hundreds of millions or billions of people.

bigbuppoabout 4 hours ago
Assistive technology is not a corner case.
whimsicalismabout 7 hours ago
as a heavy user of computer use, i hope enterprises realize that people like me will switch to competitors that support native computer use & APIs
charcircuitabout 3 hours ago
>keyboard activity, focus changes, and visibility. These events are serialized into a compact format and buffered in memory. At regular intervals, the buffered data is sent back to the evaluation layer for analysis.

So it's a keylogger?

Insimwytimabout 4 hours ago

   Precursor is a client-side, session-based verification system, built with privacy in mind, that uses dynamically injected JavaScript to continuously collect behavioral signals as visitors interact with your application. 
... I can't even ...
csomarabout 8 hours ago
So now instead of having the slow-axx Cloudflare turnstile slowing down your requests, you get surprised with a "You are a BOT!!!" while you are conducting your business on a website.

I already quickly close any website that I do not need for business purposes when it shows me the Cloudflare spinner. Now I might have to start considering competitors who do not implement this shit.

pocksuppetabout 2 hours ago
Turnstile already does the "You are a BOT!!!" thing btw, if it thinks you're a bot, which is quite rare as it seems much more permissive than systems like reCAPTCHA.
Advertisement
carterschonwaldabout 8 hours ago
even before the llm era sites would flag me as a bot for opening 15 links to read later. its fucking infuriating now
zuzululuabout 7 hours ago
hmmm i think this is the first time i've seen a genuinely decent approach to blocking scraper/agents

that mouse cursor movement is very hard to replicate a real human with the amount of data that cloudflare has you could reproduce something close but cloudflare has seen probably trillions of movements that will be tough to beat

watching this carefully but i think this is the right approach

thomastjefferyabout 6 hours ago
So we're just going to let tech monopolists make accessibility impossible, are we? Fuck that!
bellowsgulchabout 7 hours ago
Yawn. Train a domain-specific model on human inputs and then run inference against that. At integration, you change what, one line of code with another? You at best raise the expense to bot, but in today's world, this isn't much compute expense. You can do it on 10-year-old Xenon processors, the same ones used by companies promoted on LowEndBox.

Skids already fall into the trap of using open source automation like playwright-extra-stealth.