Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

65% Positive

Analyzed from 5784 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#models#chinese#open#companies#more#china#don#weight#war#training

Discussion (295 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

GodelNumbering25 minutes ago
Proprietary model weights are IP, their outputs are not IP and I can't imagine a court decision that would rule otherwise because that would set an extremely far reaching and dangerous precedent, even for American businesses.

I don't think distillation as 'stealing IP' has any legal legs. They can probably claim violation of ToS at best because the terms of use do prohibit use for training rival models.

EMIRELADERO1 minute ago
> Proprietary model weights are IP

I don't think they are. Not copyright at least. There may be some "trade secret" stuff for them but they're not copyrightable.

3eb7988a1663about 2 hours ago
If there were ever a sign I need to get mirroring, this is it.

What are the best Chinese models on HuggingFace today? Bucket by ideal RAM: <16GB, <32GB, <96, <256, 256+

Text generation, image generation, TTS, etc

commonerabout 2 hours ago
Alibaba Cloud runs ModelScope, which is like Hugging Face but based in China:

- https://modelscope.ai

- Source code (ironically on GitHub): https://github.com/modelscope/modelscope

It's not limited to Alibaba's Qwen. All of the other major Chinese ones are on there (GLM, DeepSeek, Kimi, etc.) as well as finetunes and quantizations of the non-Chinese ones.

vunderbaabout 1 hour ago
The two major image generation models are both by Alibaba - Z-Image and Qwen-Image-2512/Qwen-Edit-2511. They are both decent but have different use-cases. Unfortunately with the recent Qwen-Image 2 and now 3 it doesn't seem likely that they're going to be doing any more open-weight image gen.

https://huggingface.co/Tongyi-MAI/Z-Image-Turbo

https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen-Image-2512

https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen-Image-Edit-2511

Lord-Joboabout 1 hour ago
Specific use case is way too important for a list like that to be very helpful. I only know image gen well enough to use as an example, but style, resolution, inpainting, img2img or text2image, lora compatibility, etc. all lead to different “best” models.

Even more complex for image2video, but there’s fewer models to choose from there at least.

intrasight29 minutes ago
Sanctions would cancel the whole business rationale for the Chinese government having/supporting open weight models. You can't commoditize your competitors with open-source if your product is blocked.
commoner18 minutes ago
Even with US sanctions, Chinese AI companies would continue to serve users in every other country in the world (including China itself), so I don't see why they would stop releasing open weight models.
ericdabout 1 hour ago
My list would be to go grab GLM5.2, Deepseek v4 Flash and Pro, and the various sizes of Qwen 3.5/3.6 dense and MoE, along with at least one of the multi modal qwens (I think it’s called VL). In a pinch, you can quantize them yourself to whatever size you need.
throwa356262about 2 hours ago
It is a lost opportunity that huggingface (or unsloth) frontpage doesn't have a list like this that updates which each model release.
walrus01about 1 hour ago
From the HF front page if you hit "models" it should auto sort by trending before you change any search parameters, so if anything large, capable and popular has just been released it's almost certainly going to be at the top of the list.
abidlabsabout 2 hours ago
Hugging Face recently added a filter directly on the models page: https://huggingface.co/models that lets you filter based on hardware.
abidlabsabout 2 hours ago
Hugging Face recently added a filter directly on the models page: https://huggingface.co/models that lets you filter based on hardware.
jgbuddyabout 2 hours ago
The point of open weight models is that this is not possible, companies will be built by taking 'contraband' chinese open weight models and marketing as something from the US
intrasight32 minutes ago
Without a massive amount of post-training, it will be obvious that they are Chinese models with Chinese political ideology. I doubt that there's any business model that would work there.
jgbuddy8 minutes ago
I don't think the post-training would be that difficult. I ran an experiment on kimi k3 just now:

User: is taiwan part of china?

Kimi: Taiwan's political status is a complex and contested issue. Here's a balanced overview of the different perspectives: People's Republic of China (PRC) position: The P

<Sorry, I cannot provide this information. Please feel free to ask another question.>

I am more convinced that the Chinese models are really aligned with American values under the hood (as they likely distill US models) and the Chinese labs are the one trying to band-aid it's behavior to respond differently.

verdverm5 minutes ago
How are you accessing K3? If it is through Moonshot's API, then there is very likely guardrails, because it seems like it wanted to answer and was then cutoff.

We are starting to get access to K3 from US providers now, curious if they exhibit the same response pattern?

theredleft5 minutes ago
ask grok about the epstein files. ask gemini about the epstein files. ask them about obama's legacy as a war criminal and the reclassification of civilians as combatants to make drone striking weddings more palatable

unbelievable chauvinism in here

theredleft7 minutes ago
do you think that China is some place devoid of business? it's the center of global commerce now. you're gravely mistaken if you think that Chinese models have "Chinese political ideology" baked into them

Grok literally had post work done to make it more right wing and racist.

sheer lunacy

tencentshillabout 2 hours ago
We must all hoard all available models before they get taken down. Is anyone archiving huggingface?
throwa356262about 2 hours ago
cayley_graphabout 1 hour ago
Login-walled for me. Is there a Reddit proxy like Nitter?
troybetz26 minutes ago
yes and its faster than new reddit and written in rust too btw

https://safereddit.com/r/datahoarder

Instances:

https://github.com/redlib-org/redlib-instances/blob/main/ins...

pchewabout 1 hour ago
You can just remove the “old.” And view it on the JS invested “New Reddit” without logging in.
MeteorMarcabout 1 hour ago
Would it even be possible to ban open weight models, given all the ways they can be used in finetuned models or online services, also in 3rd countries?
jmtrevarton20 minutes ago
Does this include Deepseek? I don't know if that would crush me, but it would definitely hurt.
andaiabout 2 hours ago
Don't model weights fall under free speech?
thewebguydabout 2 hours ago
Yes, in theory, we've been through this rodeo before in the 90s. Bernstein vs. US ruled that source code is expressive speech. It's being challenged though, the court could consider weights as machine data (non-expressive operational artifacts, not human communication).

the US could also pull the functional harm argument in the same way the government uses it to regulate some protected speech (like the whole debacle over DeCSS)

Even if the free speech argument prevails, the US GOV can still use sanctions to prevent the public clouds from hosting any foreign open weight models, and prohibit US based sites from distributing the weights. It'll remain functionally legal for individuals (or at least, unenforceable) but in practice, you'll need to pirate the weights they won't be available from any US based site or provider and would be illegal for businesses to use, even if its a gray area, the liability will mean businesses won't touch them.

sixdimensionalabout 1 hour ago
I think that we humans still have a really tough time differentiating and classifying between public and private goods (and everything in between) from an economic sense.

Unfortunately, capitalism of today appears to find public goods and strong, public, healthy public goods to be undesirable investments. Yet, it seems inevitable that some things trend that direction.

I feel if we could get a better handle on what goods fall into which category, and find ways to make those things sustainable and even grow, the situation could get better.

I'm speaking purely from observations here but it also looks like in some ways, the "invisible hand of the economy" (i.e. Adam Smith) might sort these things out by itself, albeit, painfully.

We could look at the fact that LLMs were mostly created from the public domain (except when they were not), and the resulting products/services (expensive to create/operate, benefits a huge swath of humanity, has all kinds of externality issues) as something that perhaps should again almost be considered as a public good.

If we look at the struggles LLM/AI companies have had with legal structure choices, such as nonprofit, for profit, etc and pricing (e.g. do we make it accessible at a loss? Do we extract huge profits?) as a kind of moral dilemma of classifying this new economic good (LLM-based AI).

In the US, the government has been taking investment interests in some tech companies, and recent proposals even include establishing sovereign wealth funds around AI/LLM. I think this is further evidence that the system is trying to figure out how to classify these new economic goods and corporations.

aslkalskaabout 2 hours ago
side note : I wish they had an actual link to the companies instead of just their names in https://littletech.org/membership
bix644 minutes ago
> Almost 200 Silicon Valley companies, including Proton and Y Combinator…On Wednesday, the newly-formed Little Tech Association

YC is little tech? lol wut.

giancarlostoroabout 2 hours ago
I think this would be foolish, a more sound strategy is to focus on critical infrastructure and defense not using models that are "open" but they're really just binary blobs. We have models here in the states like OLMo that could receive more investing to attempt to bring them up to par with some of the frontier open-weight models, removing a lot of these concerns.
Advertisement
softwaredougabout 1 hour ago
I see we're doing "too big to fail" again...
tancopabout 2 hours ago
[flagged]
dang8 minutes ago
Maybe so, but please don't post unsubstantive comments to Hacker News.
yoyohello13about 2 hours ago
Are we not there yet?
hnfongabout 2 hours ago
There's a popular Chinese internet saying: "If you/I are/am not embarrassed, then it's the other person who is embarrassed." (只要我不尴尬,尴尬的就是别人)
tantalorabout 2 hours ago
In English, that is roughly translated to "I've already depicted you as the Soyjak and me as the Chad"

https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/depicted-as-a-soyjak

kbrissoabout 2 hours ago
I think we are pulling in the driveway.
SecretDreamsabout 1 hour ago
We're maybe only the first half decade into it. Hopefully it doesn't last a century.
realusernameabout 2 hours ago
It's been pretty clear to me since the first Trump election that it's the end of an era.
ch4s3about 2 hours ago
US real median household income has been steadily rising[1] for the last 40+ years. Life expectancy is rising again after dipping and plateauing for a few years. Employment numbers are pretty good given the macro headwinds. The US forms ~5.9 million new businesses per year which vastly out paces the EU.

The US isn't without problems, but we're doing OK.

[1] https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/MEHOINUSA672N

It's incredible that not a single person replying negatively has included a single piece of data.

Someone1234about 2 hours ago
> US real median household income has been steadily rising[1] for the last 40+ years.

Compare it to the Consumer Price Index:

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/CUUR0000SA0R

Balinaresabout 1 hour ago
So many of my people in the US can't even make ends meet anymore that I opened a dedicated line of budget to provide help where I can. It's never been that bad before and it's nowhere near as bad for my people in the EU (not that everything is all rosy there, mind you).

You might argue that Americans are just less capable of supporting themselves but I reject that argument firmly. The situation really reads like systemic causes. And I think cherry picking numbers to convince ourselves otherwise does more harm than good.

Lyngbakrabout 1 hour ago
But I think there will be a lag. The US has (willingly) forfeited some of its soft power and we may not see the impact of that immediately.
barbazooabout 1 hour ago
Maybe break down those numbers by income and you'll see that rich people are doing fine, everyone else not so much.
lowbloodsugarabout 1 hour ago
More people outside employment than COVID or Great Recession. Inflation wiping out income growth. Family units replaced by multi-job slavery shows up as “improved GDP”. There’s the powerball lottery that one person wins every few weeks and then there’s the crippling medical debt lottery that many people are “winning” every day. Wake up.
tokaiabout 1 hour ago
>Life expectancy is rising again after dipping and plateauing for a few years

Life expectancy dipping for any develop country, even if temporary, is an embarrassing catastrophe.

tr4587226717 minutes ago
You're reacting to something that didn't happen. Meanwhile China still censors their population and lives under a one party state with a ruler with no term limits.
ausbah41 minutes ago
i feel like we’ve been doing that since 1999
scotty79about 2 hours ago
I think we are already quarter of century in. It started with reaction to 9/11 and only got worse since then. Damage was pretty much self-inflicted.
2OEH8eoCRo09 minutes ago
I think it started when the Soviet Union fell apart because we had no global peer or competition and became unserious.
officialchickenabout 2 hours ago
Why jump to complex technical and policy solutions when an Open Weights AI champion trophy, in solid gold, is being requested by the Commander in Thief?
npodbielskiabout 2 hours ago
So Y Combinator signed it too? But this is HN, Y combinator website. I think I am missing something because I never read any opinion like 'we should ban Chinese models'.
drbsclabout 1 hour ago
OpenAI's strategy lead made a post on X advocating for the banning of Chinese models in the wake of Kimi K3's release.

To be clear, YCombinator et al are advocating for them to remain unbanned.

addandsubtractabout 1 hour ago
They signed the letter to prevent the banning on open-weight models.
Tenokeabout 1 hour ago
Y Combinator the company doesnt particularly have to share the opinions of hackernews the public site.
dang5 minutes ago
In this case I think the opinions are more or less the same - we all want open-weight models.
anonbuddyabout 1 hour ago
this would actually be big win for non US founders
curious_cat_163about 1 hour ago
exactly. a ban or even any restriction that is "fixed" in time is a bad idea.

The frontier is evolving so fast: any regulatory regime that started with a map of capabilities that 2025 frontier had is obsolete. Same would be true next year. This just becomes a whackamole and a government which is well-meaning and has good reasons to regulate, will have trouble keeping up.

But we know this about regulations. Like there is a century of literature on how to do this for new tech. It always targets harm prevention first. I thought Demis had the right framework for that part. I don't know if I agree fully with a self-regulatory regime because can become problematic if you don't have the right people around the table.

intheitminesabout 2 hours ago
How do you ban numbers?
dualvariable2 minutes ago
I'm old enough to remember "this shirt is a munition" and the DeCSS t-shirt.
rkozik1989about 2 hours ago
The same way you ban pirated media from being downloadable on the Internet: not effectively.
thewebguydabout 2 hours ago
Trade restrictions, sanctions. You can't effectively ban for individuals, but you can make it so legally risky for US based companies that it becomes effectively illegal as no US company will touch them, nor host them.
wizzzzzyabout 2 hours ago
In the same way you can for any digital information?
gdiamosabout 2 hours ago
How do you ban melted sand?
jMylesabout 1 hour ago
Even more bizarre than debating over whether we can stop the free flow of information across communications surfaces (we can't)... is the notion that this one person - a highly ineffectual occupant of an office whose relevance is rapidly decreasing... is somehow in charge of it.
kennywinkerabout 2 hours ago
Under what authority could he block access?
allthetimeabout 2 hours ago
Extra Judicial punishment and unwanted attention from powerful organizations is absolutely on the table for any larger startup/company who finds themselves in his radar
root_axisabout 1 hour ago
Have you been paying attention the last two years? With a few exceptions, he has unilateral authority.
vrganj39 minutes ago
The "try and stop me" authority of a guy that has armed goons marching down city streets and brutalizing his opposition.
dashundchenabout 2 hours ago
Because the spineless cowards in Congress are somehow afraid of an 80 year old demented man nearing a 30% approval rating.

Their inability to find a backbone helps them contort to whatever Trump babbles that day, even if privately they know something is idiotic or illegal.

If you want a prime example, look at how Thom Tillis suddenly finds the ability to speak out once he lost his primary.

holodukeabout 2 hours ago
It's the rule based order america is the boss in. Essentially a mafia ruled country where rules are different for opponents.
khursabout 2 hours ago
"It's a big club and you aren't in it"
Catloafdevabout 2 hours ago
The same authority he used to enact tariffs and a war.
runtime_terrorabout 2 hours ago
So, illegally, got it
gwerbinabout 2 hours ago
It has the tacit consent of Congress, so it's mostly only illegal in the way it's carried out. Congress could make most of it legal right now, but they don't want to put their names on it. Some of it would probably be unconstitutional for Congress to authorize (ironically via the nondelegation clause which is now being repurposed to justify a thoroughly unconstituational unitary executive arrangement), but much of it would not be, so it's de jure illegal but de facto legal.
margalabargalaabout 2 hours ago
At a certain level legality is enforcement. If the enforcers of the rules decline to enforce them, you're better off acknowledging what is and dealing with it.
khursabout 2 hours ago
and take over Venezuela.
bilbo0sabout 2 hours ago
I tell everyone whenever I get a chance, download any open weights models you can as soon as possible.

Buy extra hardrives. Borrow them. Do whatever you have to do.

But to paraphrase Éomer, don't trust to hope, it has abandoned these lands.

FpUserabout 1 hour ago
>"banning Americans from downloading Chinese open-weight models" - land of free is being even more so
Advertisement
otikikabout 1 hour ago
The turntables do their thing.
feverzsjabout 2 hours ago
The only thing Trump can do is building the US version of GFW, which he knows better than anyone else.
formerly_provenabout 2 hours ago
Illegal numbers 2: Electric Trumpaloo
jmyeetabout 1 hour ago
The US government exists to protect American capital and the interests of capital owners. I'm not sure why people are still confused by this.

This is about OpenAI, Anthropic and SpaceX. OpenAI, in particular, is a bet on there being a moat for AI and OpenAI "winning". Chinese models threaten this moat. The CCP has decided that it is in China's national security interests to not have Western companies "own" or "win" AI. These AI giants are large enough that the US government is going to intervene to try and protect this outcome. This is a losing battle.

misiti3780about 2 hours ago
he cant shut them off anyways, anyone can just VPN to europe and download them
thewebguydabout 1 hour ago
Individuals can. The US GOV can make it so legally risky for US based corporations to host, download, or integrate with foreign open weight models that they become effectively illegal for commercial use. Any sort of sanctions or ICTS regulations, and you'll see them all rapidly disappear from AWS, Azure, GCP, HuggingFace, GitHub, etc.
andaiabout 2 hours ago
The ducks at the park are free, you can just take one home with you.
minimaltomabout 2 hours ago
I luv this sentence but have no idea what it means lol.

Do you have many ducks at home?

therealdrag0about 1 hour ago
I think it means, just because something is accessible doesn’t mean it’s legal, permitted, or okay.
addandsubtractabout 1 hour ago
The ones at home land on a dinner plate.
ninjahawk1about 2 hours ago
The U.S. does NOT have copyright protections on the data that AI models were and are trained on, it was mass theft. Now all of a sudden, the Chinese are stealing from the thieves and we’re supposed to care?

No one cares, we just want cheaper AI models that are equally as powerful. They’re all thieves regardless.

dang3 minutes ago
Ok, but can you please follow the HN guidelines and focus on specific, thoughtful discussion, not generic/indignant tangents? The first is what we're trying for, and the second basically destroys it.

"Eschew flamebait. Avoid generic tangents."

Ultimately this is more a problem with the upvoting system than the comments themselves, since generic/indignant comments routinely attract lots of upvotes, and then sit on top of the thread, suffocating the more interesting discussion. But in terms of moderation we can only reply to commenters.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

jchwabout 1 hour ago
Its even dumber when you consider AI model output was not considered copyrighted or eligible for copyright to begin with, as far as I know. How exactly would this even be "theft"?
glaslong26 minutes ago
I can't imagine Moonshot have found a way to completely bypass the subscription or api billing either. So those model outputs have been paid for! No theft of any kind!

At most they'd be getting more out of distributed use of subsidized plans and API than the ToS would prefer.

trescenziabout 1 hour ago
Plus on top of that it's been ruled that training on copyrighted material is allowed because it's transformative. As a result even if the model output is copyrighted training on it would be as allowed as training on books.
srousseyabout 1 hour ago
It’s not they, but it does break TOS.
croteabout 1 hour ago
As if scraping the entire internet doesn't break thousands of TOSes?
TacticalCoderabout 1 hour ago
It's still the pot calling the kettle black.
cyanydeez18 minutes ago
steal from the rich -> theft

steal from the poor -> capitalism

WarmWashabout 1 hour ago
Training on copyright was ruled to be transformative.

Anthropic was just fined for not paying for the pirated books they copied into a training database. Same as anyone else who copied pirated IP onto their hard drive.

However, training an AI on copyright has been ruled to be sufficiently transformative and not a violation of IP laws. The same way you can make a gameplay clone of Call of Duty without any issue.

chalupa-supremeabout 1 hour ago
So they got fined for… stealing?

Also, if I clone Call of Duty, and use their skins, make a similar soundtrack, call my maps the same, then there will definitely be an issue.

I support the use of AI and all, but to hide behind transformative use of copyrighted intellectual property is a discredit to the colossal amount of human work and knowledge that these companies pirated and had their models trained on.

WarmWashabout 1 hour ago
>So they got fined for… stealing?

Correct, 2001 napster style pirating of content. You cannot copy stuff you didn't pay for onto your hard drive.

>Also, if I clone Call of Duty, and use their skins, make a similar soundtrack, call my maps the same, then there will definitely be an issue.

A gameplay clone as I stated, tons exist (team death match, capture the flag, battle royale, with first person gunplay and army guys shooting each other). The rest is your argument, not mine.

sznioabout 1 hour ago
yep, theft but not plagiarism.
pera6 minutes ago
Ruled by whom? The International Court of the Northern District of California?
Tyrubiasabout 1 hour ago
By that same argument, distilling a model to train your own is also transformative. We can’t have it both ways. Either both training on copyright and distillation are transformative, or both are illegal. Also, it is not a matter of settled law that training on copyright is transformative. That was a single case, and others are still pending AFAIK.
supermatt41 minutes ago
> Same as anyone else who copied pirated IP onto their hard drive

Not really the same. Private citizens have received fines MUCH higher per-work when downloading for just their private consumption.

FpUserabout 1 hour ago
>"Anthropic was just fined for not paying for the pirated books they copied into a training database."

Normal person would be sitting in jail for doing same thing. It is a shame they call it justice.

__MatrixMan__10 minutes ago
Copyright infringement, maybe. Theft? No. When something is stolen from you, you don't have that thing anymore.
petilon30 minutes ago
> The U.S. does NOT have copyright protections on the data that AI models were and are trained on, it was mass theft.

Absolutely false. Courts have decided that it is fair use [1]. That makes sense. It should not be used to justify Chinese theft.

https://www.reuters.com/world/us-judge-approves-anthropics-1...

harshalizee28 minutes ago
Why is it not fair use for the Chinese models if all they are doing is distilling these fair use models? According to the courts, AI model output is not copyrighted or eligible for copyright.
paulddraper24 minutes ago
Correct. This seems to be poorly understood.

You can use an original work to write an encyclopedia (e.g. Wikipedia). That is fair use.

You cannot copy an original work and distribute it.

LLMs are an encyclopedia.

JumpCrisscrossabout 2 hours ago
This is a silly argument. Like yes, obviously it’s of less U.S. concern if one American is robbing another versus a foreign interest. We can deal with one whenever while the other creates constraints.

The better arguments are the ones made in the article. Open weights increase competition and thus AI availability in the U.S. economy.

myrmidonabout 1 hour ago
This is not robbing. Undesired distillation is a ToS violation, at best.

There is not even jurisdiction over Chinese companies, because they don't sell their LLM subscribtions, unlike US companies, and those comitted much more severe violations in getting their training material than a ToS violation or two (Anthropic already found guilty).

edit: I don't see this as legal argument against the ban, more like a justification for why basically no moral person is gonna side with OpenAI and Anthropic on this. US gov can try and ban as many weights as they want, I expect that to be similarly effective as banning numbers was in the past (i.e. not).

nickthegreekabout 1 hour ago
> There is not even jurisdiction over Chinese companies, because they don't sell their LLM subscribtions, unlike US companies, and those comitted much more severe violations in getting their training material than a ToS violation or two (Anthropic already found guilty).

This is false. They do sell LLM subscriptions. Many also release _most_ of their models as open weights.

JumpCrisscrossabout 1 hour ago
None of it is robbing because there is no violence, but sure. The point is being confused why an external threat is treated differently from internal ones is a self goal in a debate where there are far better arguments for not banning these models.
wongarsuabout 2 hours ago
It's not like those American companies were only stealing form Americans. Maybe you could argue about utility, but morally I don't see any ground to stand on

And the utility argument is also very shaky. The proposed punishment for foreign interests stealing "US data" is that other Americans now aren't allowed to benefit from that, while the rest of the world can

JumpCrisscrossabout 1 hour ago
There isn’t an argument for banning Chinese or open-weight models. I’m just saying OP’s moralistic outrage take is about the weakest one you can come up with against it.
sscaryterryabout 2 hours ago
Obviously stealing is bad, doesn't matter who you steal from. In this case, its a simple case of no honour amongst thieves.
JumpCrisscrossabout 2 hours ago
> its a simple case of no honour amongst thieves

Which is why making an honour-based argument to said thieves is silly.

throwfaraway4about 1 hour ago
Whether or not it’s robbery is irrelevant. It’s the proposed remedy that is the problem
JumpCrisscrossabout 1 hour ago
Sure. Great. OP’s argument focuses on the outrage. That’s focusing on the first bit.
randbyteabout 2 hours ago
Blatantly lack of principles.
JumpCrisscrossabout 1 hour ago
Sure. The American electorate isn’t really principled right now. If the best argument we can surface is this tripe, we’ll lose access.
paulddraper30 minutes ago
You're trying to kidnap what I've rightfully stolen!

https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x4cxcsa

lenerdenatorabout 1 hour ago
The answer to widespread theft is not to simply allow the guy who did the theft to get away with it because his implementation was cheaper.

It's to punish theft.

VulgarExigency36 minutes ago
But distillation is not theft. They are paying for the usage of the API. It is also not copyright infringement, as AI companies do not hold the copyright for the output of their models.
skeeter2020about 1 hour ago
not when by your own rules it's legally ruled "not theft".
lenerdenatorabout 1 hour ago
Rules are flexible. The people who pay attention know this.

People expect the US to apply rules evenly to both American AI efforts and that of its primary geopolitical rival. China certainly doesn't do that. Their entire economy is based around giving Chinese firms the advantage regardless of what it means for the wallets of consumers at home or abroad.

Since that's who we're playing against, and no one is going to willingly give up their open-weight models from the totalitarian rival, well, then use their ruleset.

It's that or punish the theft by making the US companies pay for their training data and blocking outside efforts that trained off the data the US companies stole.

lcnPylGDnU4H9OFabout 1 hour ago
Exactly! While the people who spent more money on their theft are rewarded with more business to counteract their losses! Justice is finally being wrought on those who have wronged society with their wicked ways!

(/s if it wasn't obvious)

Being serious, it is far more likely, especially given the events of the past 18 momths, that Trump is just doing autocrat things because he can, and ultimately doesn't really care what is and is not good for American business as long as he continues to grow his wealth through corrupt behavior.

nekusarabout 1 hour ago
Are public libraries thieves?

Is Anna's Library thieves?

Is Library Genesis thieves?

Is Archive.org thieves?

Is PirateBay thieves?

They all look like public libraries to me. And better access to all human knowledge is a net positive for everyone.

sheeshkebababout 1 hour ago
Someone going to public library, copying every book out of it and then selling them as their own are thieves.
RiverCrochet8 minutes ago
Not technically theft unless the public library no longer has the books. Selling something and saying you created it when you didn't is a different five-letter word: fraud.

Putting prompts in an LLM and saying you "created" the image or text thereof is fraud.

__MatrixMan__5 minutes ago
No, they've merely infringed copyright. Theft is a well understood concept and it does not pertain to information.
sscaryterryabout 1 hour ago
I don't believe anything is being sold here :)
lcnPylGDnU4H9OF41 minutes ago
Okay, but that's not what happened as far as I'm aware. Who did they sell their copies of the books to?
tokaiabout 1 hour ago
Public library buy the works they distribute. They also pay for the usage of these works. Copying of said works is still illegal. You should read up on how libraries actually work.
stanac21 minutes ago
> Copying of said works is still illegal.

Yes it is, but at least they are not charging for the access.

nekusar38 minutes ago
That's NOT always been the case.

Libraries used to require membership and dues. Those then bought more books on the used or retail market. LOTS of fights were about that system, cause book publishers hated libraries. And well, they still do.

And to be fair, fuck copyright. Its holds all of us back, so someone can go "FUCK YOU, NO". And nobody or company deserves what is it, 70 years+ death copyright length.

And with the recent Anthropic settlement, used to be, for-profit pirates would go to prison. I also remember absurd 2000's settlements over Britney Spears and Metallica for $5000-$7000 for 20 songs.

You are not going to win me over on massive gatekeeping human knowledge over "Itssss ill-eagle!". I know, and I don't care. And if I'm ever in a case over this, I'll tank it.

ClumsyPilotabout 1 hour ago
That’s fine too, in that case Open Weight models made by China are doing humanity a favour
nekusarabout 1 hour ago
I strongly believe that's the case. That's even the case with the recent OpenAI hack of HuggingFace.

The censorship of US models is so bad (read: guardrails), that they had to use GLM 5.2 on their own hardware to do the analysis. That's how locked down, restrictive, and closed source American models are. They're basically for-profit piracy by way of selling tokens.

Whereas the Chinese models are just "here you go, download and run".

I know what I run. Qwen3.5 and 3.6 and GLM5.2 . USA token vendors are incentivised in doing worse to sell more slot machine tokens.

jMylesabout 1 hour ago
The era of so-called "intellectual property" is over.

You can accept it or not. But it's going to be a lot easier if you do.

croteabout 1 hour ago
So how come Disney still gets upset when I provide copies of their movies on my website as "training set for biological neural networks"?

The problem isn't that IP is dying - in most industries it died ages ago. The problem is that it is now explicitly reserved for the rich.

warkdarriorabout 1 hour ago
The solution is straightforward -- be rich!
mc32about 1 hour ago
One’s like taking something from your brother or sister and the other is like taking from your neighbor with whom you have a bad history…
GlickWickabout 2 hours ago
I do care.

It's an unfortunate truth that we're exiting a global peace era and entering one of (hopefully just...) implied conflict. Our biggest geopolitical rival that's been threatening a hot war also distilling the things we build is not a good thing.

Trump is a huge self-own by our electorate sadly, but being concerned about a conflict between China and the US is a very bi-partisan concern for good reason.

mywittynameabout 1 hour ago
Luckily for the peace side, the USA's inability to achieve their mission objectives in a war against an adversary that was perceived as being substantially weaker means they are very much less likely to engage in one with a "near peer".

The take away from modern conflicts is that massive military size disparities don't translate into successful invasions anymore.

In other words, it's unlikely USA will pursue a conflict with China, and it's unlikely China will pursue a conflict with Taiwan.

mlinharesabout 1 hour ago
Yes, the administration is definitely and would not start a war for no reason other than to start a war.

People really have to stop sanewashing the government, it doesn't work anymore, these people are not thinking through what they're doing.

srousseyabout 1 hour ago
I don’t think those are “learned” lessons. Only how to push harder next time.
guaxabout 2 hours ago
Might wanna reflect on who’s threatening hot war lately.
dghlsakjgabout 1 hour ago
It's not a threat anymore if you actually start a war!

/s

GlickWickabout 1 hour ago
The main actors threatening (and delivering) a hot war are China, and by proxy, Russia. The Ukraine war is absolutely and transparently enabled by China, who is also trying to actively destabilize the EU and the US in order to make its conquest of Taiwan more likely.

Yes, the US has an idiot in charge who is threatening these things in response, too. However, unlike China, the electorate does not support him. His election is also almost certainly due to aggressive campaigns to destabilize the US internally for this exact purpose.

Tyrubiasabout 1 hour ago
Our biggest geopolitical rival is also the only thing standing in the way of a potential duopoly on LLMs using closed weight models. I would not say I’m a fan of the PRC by any means, but I also do not want to see closed weight models controlled by two big companies dominating what I can use. Especially since said companies arbitrarily restrict model usage and can ban users for no reason.
dgellowabout 1 hour ago
> It's an unfortunate truth that we're exiting a global peace era

You’re a tiny bit late on that one

GlickWickabout 1 hour ago
No, we are in the process of an exit. This takes time
4wsnabout 1 hour ago
I keep hearing about this "we" as if it's still a coherent nation state and not just an unaccountable ruling class from both parties where the most severe consequence is failing upwards into a lobbyist provided position. I literally have no moral preference when it comes to the US or the CCP nor do I care if the entire nation state fails, let alone loses to a geopolitical rival.
dataflowabout 1 hour ago
> nor do I care if the entire nation state fails

You should care because of the nukes, if nothing else.

mywittynameabout 1 hour ago
> both parties

I'm sorry, but only one "party" is comprised of fascist plutocrats speed-running the end of democracy in the USA.

The USA and world would be a vastly different place had a different party maintained power in the USA 10 years ago.

Balinaresabout 1 hour ago
I don't think I would characterize this last era as one of global peace.
solumunusabout 2 hours ago
I’m not convinced that it’s a bad thing. What is your actual argument?
GlickWickabout 2 hours ago
My argument is that a major world power is pushing towards global conflict by simultaneously funding the conquest of Ukraine while building its own invasion fleet for Taiwan. Allowing them to also destabilize us internally is not exactly a good idea.
Tostinoabout 2 hours ago
Ask yourself, who seems to be the destabilizing force if you take a step back and look at the state of things objectively?

There is some blame on all sides for sure, not saying it's black and white...but come on.

johnsmith184035 minutes ago
Almost all current world events as of now are directly tied to the fact that the west is in active freakout mode over china building a army large enough to attack the entire world. Iran and venuzuela are a direct response to it.

1. China is actively genociding an entire ethnic people.

2. They are actively building a military larger and faster than any country on earth in all of history.

3. They are actively threatening ALL of their neighbors with war. Actively attacking their ships and building military bases in other countries territory.

4. China's open stated goals are to conquer and control its neighbors and every single step over the last 10 years is proof of that.

GlickWickabout 2 hours ago
I think the major destabilizing force is the country that has been building the infrastructure for a hot war over Taiwan for the last decade while simultaneously blatantly funding the conquest of Ukraine.

The US stupidly withdrawing from the world stage is definitely making this worse, of course, but it is not the catalyst. It's unfortunately a very likely side effect of a social media campaign by the same actor to make said hot war easier to win.

JumpCrisscrossabout 2 hours ago
> who seems to be the destabilizing force if you take a step back and look at the state of things objectively?

All of them. Pretending there is a benevolent bully among Russia, China and America is baseless.

This is probably the strongest moral argument for open-weight models. It decouples AI, somewhat, from military-industrial might.

martythemaniakabout 1 hour ago
I honestly wonder what world folks like you live in. The US is currently at war, repeatedly threatening several other places and engaged in several costly trade wars. From my Canadian perspective, you are a danger and a menace. China is a commodity supplier. Do the war crimes your country is currently committing not register for you at all? The daily threats, insults, and economic attacks on your 'allies', does that register?

China supports Russia in its war formally, but practically it sells Ukraine whatever it needs, because a weak vassal-like Russia is very much in their interests. The US is far, far more outspoken and active supporter of Russia in this war.

Finally, there will be no hot war with China. They'll likely blockade and invade Taiwan before the end of the decade, but the US will not do anything, partly because it'll be exhausted from it's never ending middle east wars, partly because it'll only take a small bribe to get Trump to back off. He's genuinely fond of dictators like Xi.

srousseyabout 1 hour ago
Or… war with China is inevitable if only to keep the gap in military capabilities. There is a thinking to mow down their military while we still can in some circles. Like those in power currently. Scary.
chewsabout 1 hour ago
Wow, what happened to no holds barred American capitalism? Is it bad when the Chinese somehow do it better? The US stateowning US Steal, Intel, and possibly openai is no different than the Chinese ownership model… and before the US took stakes in the companies they were just bankrolling them as customers SpaceX Oracle etal.

If life is a meritocracy, you gotta give it to the Chinese for their immense growth and improvement of living from agricultural poverty to technical supremacy. I don't want to hear the they stole our IP argument either, because all math is borrowed from something else. Distillation is innovation, in booze and in models.

1234letshaveatwabout 1 hour ago
"what happened to no holds barred American capitalism?" you mean the strawman that never existed?
mathisfun123about 1 hour ago
> Our biggest geopolitical rival

People on here have zero consistency in their worldviews.

Ask any capitalism zealot (ie hners) whether markets are zero sum and they'll wax poetical about "creating value". But then talk to them about Chinese competition and suddenly everything is a rivalrous good lolol.

I hate to break it to you, your so called rival won this game decades ago when you undercut the working class to make a buck and laundered cheap Chinese labor as productivity. So if you believe the Chinese are rivals um welcome to "reap what you sew" <shrug>.

GlickWickabout 1 hour ago
I'm not the "hive mind" of HN or whatever. Individuals hold unique opinions.

Yes, China is a rival. No, they have not won. Their economy is in a lot of trouble, likely far worse than the shape of the US's currently. That situation may accelerate a hot war though, as has historically been the case globally.

chrisnightabout 2 hours ago
> the US can “sanction” companies that engage in intellectual property theft.

Peak hypocrisy, US AI companies can train on unlimited intellectual property with 0 rights to it, while Chinese AI companies have to explicitly get the rights to data that isn’t even copyrightable/copyrighted (since AI alone can’t copyright it).

hnfongabout 2 hours ago
It's not IP theft if US courts say it isn't.

And if the accused company is outside of the US, well, US courts have no jurisdiction so apparently the US government can just claim they are guilty and impose the sanctions...

Frierenabout 2 hours ago
The USA has stolen intellectual property from ALL AROUND THE WORLD. AI is not trained just in copyrighted USA content.

Other countries have a say about it.

throw1234567891about 2 hours ago
And it’s not a war if Putin says so. And it’s not a possible future invasion of Taiwan if Xi says so. Who cares what US courts say.
InsideOutSantaabout 2 hours ago
Meanwhile, X.ai committing all of the crimes.
1234letshaveatwabout 1 hour ago
did you mean Xi.ai?
MangoCoffeeabout 2 hours ago
US's court can enforce IPs. Didn't Antrhpic just agree to pay book authors billion for the recent lawsuit settlement?
ctxcabout 2 hours ago
Anthropic was asked to pay book authors because it trained on pirated downloaded books.

What about books and art where the author/artist does not authorise AI to train on it? They do happily train on it, ignoring their "ToS".

This is just double standards, a slap on the wrist to not worsen the situation with authors imo.

You could also say the Chinese companies are doing the same - they _do_ pay for their Anthropic subscriptions after all.

WarmWashabout 1 hour ago
>Anthropic was asked to pay book authors because it trained on pirated downloaded books.

No, it was asked to pay book authors because it pirated copies of books and stored them on their hard drives. The ruling had nothing to do with training.

adrrabout 1 hour ago
Pirating millions of dollars worth of books would land people in jail. Government went after Aaron Scwartz for "pirating" scientific journals.
chmod775about 2 hours ago
The judge explicitly ruled that training on the books was fine.

They just should have bought them, rather than pirating them.

Also LLM output is not IP (in itself) in the first place, nor would Anthropic want to claim it is and that they have rights to it - that would drive paying customers away.

The issue comes down to at most ToS violations.

nickthegreekabout 1 hour ago
> They just should have bought them, rather than pirating them.

Bought, scanned and destroyed them I believe. The judge okay'd Destructive Scanning.

Rebelgeckoabout 2 hours ago
The settlement doesn't cover the actual training on copy written material
zuzululuabout 2 hours ago
That will never happen. Copyright is not a thing in China.
aerodexisabout 1 hour ago
too bad hypocrisy never got in the way of people making money
SubiculumCodeabout 2 hours ago
Not in Trump's power.
logicchainsabout 2 hours ago
If he can ban Chinese TikTok for alleged national security reasons, I'm sure he can also similarly ban Chinese AI.
b112about 2 hours ago
https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

Please don't use uppercase for emphasis. Instead, put asterisks* around it and it will get italicized. More formatting info here.*

SubiculumCodeabout 1 hour ago
fixed.
b11242 minutes ago
I vouched, not sure it will help.
functionmouseabout 2 hours ago
he could order possession of it treason and punishable similarly to other illegal numbers.
bakiesabout 2 hours ago
no he can't, he doesnt make laws
amanaplanacanalabout 2 hours ago
Legality doesn't seem to have much effect, in his case.
tensegristabout 2 hours ago
executive orders?
bethekidyouwantabout 1 hour ago
“And they warn that banning Americans from downloading Chinese open-weight models wouldn’t stop their proliferation — but would weaken U.S. startups.”

Well this doesn’t even make sense.

krupan2 minutes ago
It does because corporations, especially smaller ones competing with bigger ones, actually do get prosecuted for violating restrictions like this a lot more than individuals do.
gawsabout 1 hour ago
"Nooooo!!! We already laid off half our workforce and got priced out of models from American companies. We need the cheaper models, even risking giving all our data to a foreign adversary, so our big number goes up long enough for us to get acquired!!!"
Advertisement
gdiamosabout 2 hours ago
I think we should shut it off. It would force US companies to build open models.
preg_matchabout 1 hour ago
I think it would do the opposite. They would have a monopoly just handed to them, and a large market with no options. They'd have zero incentives to provide open weight models.

Right now, I think their incentive is the highest: Chinese AI companies are dropping competitive models left and right, and clearly American companies are feeling the pressure, given they're pulling every legal leg they can to suppress their competition. If we just remove the competition, Anthropic et al win. It's a temporary and short-sighted victory, but this is America. Every company is short-sighted, it's baked into our financial infrastructure.

thewebguydabout 2 hours ago
US labs would have even less incentive to build open if we blocked foreign open weight models, and we'd be engaging in protectionism yet again, also giving them zero incentive to compete.