Back to News
Advertisement
ssnyy about 4 hours ago 13 commentsRead Article on usefeyn.com
Hey HN, I’m Shreyash from Feyn. We help companies build custom models from their data.

Today, we’re releasing FeyNoBg, an automatic background removal model. Alongside it, we're open-sourcing NoBg, the Python library we built to train and run it.

Try the model here: https://huggingface.co/spaces/feyninc/feynobg. Check out the library here: https://github.com/feyninc/nobg

Some sample outputs:

(1) Soccer Freekick: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1MZkAGLwbhNVOZ0Oi7XvpCfSEu9Q...

(2) Hair in wind: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Odc2m0XMVH9uZtvI_KjaRbXzhLL...

(3) Bicycle with visible spokes: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1h99ahjfrtS1MFQJJgiKE2fuM3HZ...

(4) Live Demo video: https://youtu.be/b1heHPvY8BM

Background removal separates an image's subject from its surrounding. We've all tried it at some point. Often it is to reuse the subject in a different artifact. Nowadays, it is common to make chat stickers out of it. It is one of the most common but under-appreciated uses of AI. It is also surprisingly complex. Models can be easily confused by camouflage, motion blur, or fine structures like hair.

The task requires two skills. First, a model has to identify the foreground. Second, it has to trace the foreground’s boundary and estimate an opacity value for each pixel. Generally, these skills are taught with different datasets. That creates a failure point. A poor training mix can improve one skill at the expense of the other. We saw this in our controlled evaluation. A training run with just the MaskFactory dataset improved on the CAMO benchmark but regressed on DIS5K.

For FeyNoBg, we took an interpretability-first approach to training. We first studied how BiRefNet’s stages contribute to finding the foreground and reconstructing its boundary. We discovered that the third stage of it's feature extractor holds a lot of information. Both localization and boundary reconstruction depend heavily on the feature map produced here.

This led us to expand this stage from 18 to 24 blocks while preserving the pre-trained weights. We then trained FeyNoBg on 26.1K diverse examples assembled from 10 datasets. The goal was to improve foreground identification and boundary precision without sacrificing either one.

Across eight benchmarks, FeyNoBg achieves the best published score on four and comes within 2% of the leader on the rest.

Building FeyNoBg also exposed a tooling problem. Image matting models are usually released as isolated repositories with incompatible preprocessing, training, and evaluation code. We built NoBg to solve this. NoBg puts these workflows behind one Python interface. It supports BiRefNet today, with more architectures coming. We hope you build something exciting with it!

Happy to answer any questions!

Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

92% Positive

Analyzed from 273 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#love#https#com#github#run#model#license#image#didn#something

Discussion (13 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

woadwarrior0138 minutes ago
Why extend an MIT licensed model's weights (BiRefNet) and release it under a cc-by-nc-4.0 license?
nickludlamabout 2 hours ago
This looks great! What are the resolution limits? From the GitHub readme I saw mention of 1024x1024, but I was able to process an image 1920x2880 just fine. I didn't see any really obvious scaling artefacts, so is there something clever happening behind the scenes?
snyyabout 2 hours ago
We resize the opacity mask. That tends to scale better
geooff_about 2 hours ago
I love seeing this. Background removal is such a core task used in so many systems, I group it in with speech to text in terms of importance.

I love seeing maturity getting pushed in this space. Congratulations to you and the team!

defmetrixabout 2 hours ago
This is awesome, I just bookmarked your tool. Ive been looking for something simple to use, since Its not easy to use the segment anything tool anymore. Thanks!
snyyabout 2 hours ago
Thanks! Feel free to open an issue if you run into any issues with the outputs

https://github.com/feyninc/nobg/issues

yaroneabout 2 hours ago
I was so impressed with remove.bg in Dec 2018; awesome to see the progress in this area, so cool.
sudbabout 2 hours ago
very cool! I've been having a fun time porting non-LLM models to iOS/Android (recently had some success with making Bonsai's image generation model run on Android) - have you attempted to run any of the workflows on a mobile device at all? Mind if I try?
snyyabout 2 hours ago
Please do try, I would love nothing more!

All I ask is you make a PR to https://github.com/feyninc/nobg with your results. We'd love to see what you make, contribute in any way we can, and share onwards.

sudbabout 2 hours ago
Of course, would be happy to!
bickovabout 3 hours ago
[flagged]
dangabout 3 hours ago
Can you please not post AI-generated or AI-edited comments to HN? It's not allowed here - see https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html#generated and https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47340079.

Of course, it's impossible to know for sure what was LLM processed or not, but some of your posts (like this one) have been getting classified that way.

snyyabout 3 hours ago
The 4K cap was a judgement call, we didn't want one source to dominate. The license is cc-by-nc, just added it to the hugging face