My Local LLM Scored 6/6. It Was Wrong Every Time

Jfc Claude's writing can be really intolerable sometimes. Trying to parse wtf this post is saying - I guess the author is trying to make a harness for local models, and tried to have codex/Claude code autonomously make the harness better, used some sort of vibe coded test suite for that goal that was broken, switched to a different benchmark later, and the conclusion is that occasionally you can use an AI to over fit a harness to a benchmark?