Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚑ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

50% Positive

Analyzed from 124 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#copyright#law#internal#legal#project#don#ownership#copy#once#again

Discussion (6 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

ompogUeβ€’42 minutes ago
Once again, see Rainbows End, by Vernor Vinge. Foresaw exactly this. Written in 2006, takes place in 2025.
trhwayβ€’about 3 hours ago
"...Internal documents unsealed in legal filings in January revealed that Anthropic was acutely aware of how negatively such a project would be received outside the company.

β€œProject Panama is our effort to destructively scan all the books in the world,” an internal planning document said. β€œWe don’t want it to be known that we are working on this.” ..."

ronsorβ€’about 2 hours ago
Don't like it? Change copyright.

They do this because the law required it.

jdiffβ€’34 minutes ago
They ignored the same copyright laws in many other cases. Why do we believe they were abiding strictly by it this time?
4gotunameagainβ€’about 1 hour ago
What did the law require ?

And since when do AI companies care about copyright law ?

ceejayozβ€’18 minutes ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First-sale_doctrine

> After the initial transfer of ownership of a legal copy of a copyrighted work, the first-sale doctrine eliminates the copyright holder's right to control ownership of that specific copy.