Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

50% Positive

Analyzed from 86 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#tls#features#spec#shouldn#surprise#years#widely#adopted#haven#paid

Discussion (3 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

mcpherrinmabout 1 hour ago
This shouldn’t be too much of a surprise, as TLS 1.3 has been out for many years and is widely adopted.

I haven’t paid too much attention to the TLS WG lately (for obvious reasons if you look at their mailing list), but I assume this is mostly a “if you want Post-Quantum cryptography, you need 1.3”.

BobbyTables222 minutes ago
I don’t get it. Were there revisions or optional features of v1.2?

I thought the 1.2 spec was the frozen spec.

kijin33 minutes ago
Makes sense. Nobody wants to deal with "this user-agent claims to support TLS 1.2, except this extension that was added in 2026" anymore.

If you're going to add or remove features, follow semver and bump that number.