Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

43% Positive

Analyzed from 2567 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#change#more#climate#years#summer#global#going#countries#scorched#here

Discussion (79 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

snickyabout 2 hours ago
I just came back from Hungary and Slovakia and it really caught my attention that the grass everywhere was just yellow. I wasn't sure if it's normal by this time of the year, but truely, both countries look like Greece now.
vinc24 minutes ago
Same in Northwest France: I've never seen the grass so yellow, and now the ground is even becoming bare brown. Some tree species are yellowing/browning. With the prolonged lack of rain and extreme heat for the region, it's a summer like I've never seen before. And it's probably one of the coolest of the rest of my life.
s_devabout 1 hour ago
Same in Ireland. I think the country grass is fields or near woodlands or rivers is still holding on to its green but urban grass in parks is scorched. I've never seen this before.

Ireland is fundamentally a wet country and always has been.

jacquesmabout 2 hours ago
Same here in NL. A few drops of rain today, for the first time in a long time.
fakedangabout 1 hour ago
Same in Switzerland. Trees have started yellowing a month before autumn.
xnxabout 1 hour ago
In Spain I drove past fields of sunflowers that were all wilted. Formerly grass fields are totally yellow and crunch underfoot.
geremiiahabout 3 hours ago
I remember in 2010, corporate propagandists were telling us that the effects of climate change won't be felt for a 100 years.
andaiabout 3 hours ago
netsharcabout 3 hours ago
There's an outdated statement: 50% of the fossil fuel civilization has burned, we burned after 1992. Outdated, so that percentage is probably a lot higher now.
bethekindabout 3 hours ago
Climate change affects geographies unequally. Seems like Europe and the tropics have been the first to suffer, year after year, and with the UK losing that warm current in ~47 years, can't help but wonder what is on European minds.
dgellowabout 3 hours ago
> can't help but wonder what is on European minds

The main thing I have in mind is that human civilization is completely fucked. What is needed to ensure things aren’t too horrible in the next century is so drastic and requires such a global coordinated effort that will never happen. There is no technology or super authority that will magically save us from a climate catastrophe this century.

Given the vast majority of the world population still see vegetarianism as a joke and not a necessity, and developed countries are ready to sacrifice pretty much everything to the AI compute gods we are truly fucked

H4cks0r1337about 2 hours ago
>the vast majority of the world population still see vegetarianism as a joke and not a necessity

I'm pretty convinced that lots of people would be willing to make sacrifices. But not while Mark Zuckerberg is allowed to feed his Angus beef Macadamia nuts on Hawaii and all the invitees fly in separate private jets to COP26 instead of making it an online event.

The message of "sacrifice for thee, but not for me!" should not be underestimated here.

dgellowabout 2 hours ago
You can only control your own actions. Reducing your meat consumption by like 80% is very low effort. It’s honestly ridiculous that still has to be argued about
belornabout 1 hour ago
Changing peoples culture is about as simple as changing peoples religion. Getting people who eat meat to switch to vegetarianism is like trying to get vegetarians to reduce their land usage by switching to some amount of shell fish or sea weed, the later which is vegetarian but not necessary the kind of plants that people are used to.

It should be much easier to convince people that emission free energy production is a necessity, and yet there is for all practical purpose no such political movement or any political party that actually support the simple fact that producing electricity and heat through burning carbon based fuel is completely unnecessary and should have been relegated as a something past civilizations did. We don't need to convince the world population to change their culture in order to not construct new thermal power plants, only political will and money.

netsharcabout 3 hours ago
Yeah, conflict is guaranteed. China will probably invade Russia and secure Lake Baikal and vast areas of Siberia. Europe might start shooting at "smugglers" earnestly (sorry to the "collateral damage").

I guess Eric or Barron will follow Project 2025 Edition 10's guideline and invade Greenland to secure their water for USA. And Canada's favorable climate?

esafakabout 2 hours ago
AI is more energy efficient and faster than we are. If there is anything thinking needed to solve the problem, it's best to lean on AI.
Hackbratenabout 2 hours ago
We don't need AI to figure it out. It's been researched to death already. Go vegetarian, abolish fossil fuels, buy less.

The problem is that way too few are willing to change their habits, and legislators have near-zero incentive to enact unpopular rules to help mitigate the problems. AI isn't going to change any of that.

watwut27 minutes ago
AI datacenters will make it worst. And Musk and Thiel and the rest dont give a shit about planet.
wiz21cabout 2 hours ago
I tell anyone I meet to seriously consider what immigration will be like when anthropogenic global warming will get stronger. I'm neither pro/against immigration but I know many people are scared by immigration (as is demonstrated in many EC countries by the progression of far right parties).

I also tell them to remember that food prices and insurances prices will inevitably go up.

And I won't much more that that because everything else fails (even the death of 1000 persons in my country during this years heat waves just make people say "bah, that's life")

irthomasthomasabout 1 hour ago
I think you may have cause and affect reversed. It seems to me that fear of migrants grows proportional to the funding of far right parties.
poloticsabout 1 hour ago
Some who think right now that immigration is bad, may later be amongst the ones that decide to emigrate. Then they will know.
spwa435 minutes ago
Are you somehow under the illusion that countries that "send" immigrants now will be accepting of return immigrants in the future?

This is 100% a one way street for most governments.

dariosalvi78about 2 hours ago
> can't help but wonder what is on European minds

that only a big catastrophe, possibly a global war, will make people think again

KellyCriterionabout 1 hour ago
other two options:

a) Asteroid strike

b) Arrival of Aliens (in a sense of "evident to everywhone on earth")

throwawayqqq11about 1 hour ago
Next year, el nino may hit and the extremes will set new records again. I wonder if einstein was right and human stupidity is infinite. On the other side, we can achieve alot as a society when the narratives are positive.
spwa434 minutes ago
El nino hit this year and will be back to normal next year:

https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2026-08-13/risk-of-...

But first we get to experience (probably) record rainfall in autumn and winter.

andaiabout 3 hours ago
>with the UK losing that warm current in ~47 years

What's that going to look like?

bestouffabout 3 hours ago
Very hot in summer, very cold in winter.
kuerbelabout 1 hour ago
AngryDataabout 2 hours ago
Significantly colder in the winter. Im not sure how much it would change summer temps though, it could just affect the amount of rain.
afavourabout 3 hours ago
People might be ice skating on the Thames again.
RobotToasterabout 3 hours ago
> with the UK losing that warm current in ~47 years

Guess it will cancel out the increased temperature?

undersuitabout 2 hours ago
The AMOC delivers warm air year round, it cools the UK from the hotter southern air during the summer.
gib444about 2 hours ago
> but wonder what is on European minds

UK here. It really feels like this year has been a massive wake-up call, a follow-up to the one of 2022 (and 2018, 2019, 2021...)

Some fire services have had their busiest months on record this year. In an extraordinary (and controversial) move, they convinced the government to use the phone Emergency Alert system to alert the entire country about the risk of fires.

Prior to summer, in the North of England, it was extremely windy and gloomy from September to May. Very very few blue skies. The other day, we went from a 2-day mini heat wave (35c & 28c) to gloomy cloud in 2 days - it's just so bizarre.

We've just had our 5th or 6th heatwave of the summer

A train derailed yesterday due to a buckled rail. Another derailed, cause of which is suspected to be heat/drought related. Luckily no fatalities.

We've had more wildfires than 2022 and drought is more widespread. I often can't have my window open at night when it's 29c inside because of the fires 10-20 miles away. I have no A/C

I'm wondering if our future is gales and grey for 9 months then heatwaves and drought? I know the North of England is historically gloomy, but it 'feels' different of late.

It feels like we do not have the money to begin to prepare and fix things that need fixing to continue the life we have. We haven't built a reservoir since 1990 despite massive population increase. Our rail network is not prepared for heat waves or long periods of drought or long periods of rain or long periods of ice/snow. London buses mostly have no A/C, ditto rest of the country. Many people don't have money for A/C at home - not even sure our electricity network could handle it. And about 100 other issues...

qball25 minutes ago
>It feels like we do not have the money to begin to prepare and fix things that need fixing to continue the life we have.

Oh, you have the money.

You just don't want to spend it, for that would shift the balance of political power in the country towards labor and away from capital, and away from the old and towards the young, for the wages of labor and the young would have to rise.

That's anathema to an upper class and a body politic whose primary objective is controlling the cost of labor, and even the political party that's named after labor has no plan to change that.

This is going to continue until the current body politic is more afraid of dying from heatstroke than they are of anyone else being in charge.

fifiluraabout 1 hour ago
Did Nigel Farange change his mind?
spwa421 minutes ago
Why would it matter at all? Top CO2 emitters:

Country Share Cumulative Cumulative (Gt)

China 33% 33% 11.4-13.1

United States 11.7% 44.7% 16.0-18.1

India 8% 52.7% 19.1-21.2

Russia 5.1% 57.8% 21.1-23.2

Japan 2.5% 60.3% 22.1-24.2

UK 0.8% 0.3-0.4 (no cumulative figure)

Note that, first, there really is not much point to doing anything if you don't reduce by at least 52% in 3 years or less (less than that, or more time, will not make the difference between IPCC >2 and <2 scenarios). Hence without drastic reductions from the Chinese government (not promises, not "look at our beautiful new solar field", ONLY we're stopping these HUNDREDS of coal mines WITHIN 2 years) you've pretty much already lost, since a lot of countries lower on the list will definitely be increasing, and have declared it colonization for the west to demand they stop. Oh, by the way, you also must convince many African countries to stop that whole "electricity for our people" thing, otherwise the needed reduction is also a pipedream.

Note that just stopping CO2 output does not matter if it just gets transplanted somewhere else. In other words: the only way to make a difference is to stop first coal and then oil from being dug up in the first place, and let the CO2 emissions "take care of themselves". Otherwise CO2 emission reductions are local, not global, and so without reducing coal mining and oil pumping reductions do not matter and will not make any difference to global warming.

The only countries in the EU that have any influence at all is Norway, and they would have to just give up between 20% and 40% of their national income (France and the Netherlands are rounding errors, and Russia is not EU), and that's a typical figure.

In other words: this will not happen, there is no way in hell the governments involved will agree to even half of what's needed. And the UK, in fact all western governments other than Norway, US, Canada and Mexico have no influence and cannot realistically make a meaningful contributions to stopping climate change. And even those countries that can contribute will have to give up A LOT and it won't matter unless you get China, Russia and Saudi Arabia to follow suit.

Oh and if you do get this going, it'll cause a lot of pain in most of the world.

kvgrabout 3 hours ago
Well in my mind is no one else cares and the EU is holier than pope. We are destroying our economy for promile of world polution and are even shamed for using AC.
deadbunnyabout 1 hour ago
Could you provide a link to people being shamed for using AC?
layer844 minutes ago
It’s becoming less, but the formerly widespread traditional view in Europe was that using AC is a frivolous waste of energy that contributes to environmental pollution and global warming.
Hackbratenabout 1 hour ago
This narrative is dangerous. If everyone points to their own limited influence and points fingers at the rest of the world, no one is going to act.
throwawayqqq11about 1 hour ago
Game theory gives all of us an optimal solution, so we all should care about every bit, no matter the global proportion. Btw. Chians per capital CO2 emission is lower than most of europe.
comrade1234about 1 hour ago
I think the cows are very stressed here in Switzerland. I make cheese every now and then - ricotta and paneer. It's simple. I buy the milk from a "milch-Automat" - farms around here (Zurich) have machines where you can buy a liter of raw milk from the farm for cheap. So, the milk I'm using is direct from the cows.

I made paneer a week ago. Normally I can cut it up and brown it and make the edges crispy. But for this batch I got far less cheese than normal and it was wet - I had to let the molded paneer dry out longer than normal. Then when I went to brown it the entire batch just melted into a gloopy mess - that just doesn't happen.

Reminded me of the omen.

tills13about 2 hours ago
It's very disheartening as someone who enjoys recreational fishing that the river closures -- typically legally closed to fishing, but otherwise ethically closed -- are getting earlier and earlier. That is, if the rivers aren't straight up bone dry peak summer.

I'm pretty young, too, so I have this, if not worse than this, to look forward to for the majority of my life.

Not to mention here in BC we're up to three summers in a row where entire towns have burned down ... not a positive sign of things to come.

delegateabout 1 hour ago
My only practical contribution to fixing this issue is to upvote this article.. and write a message on HN.

I'm in Spain.

I really hope that after this summer, people of Europe will wake up and make fixing the climate their highest priority - at home, at work, in politics. We have very little time left, maybe a few years.

I can still see news articles everywhere blaming 'climate change' and 'CO2 emissions', pointing the finger at the oil companies and the likes. But those 'bad' guys are not operating in a void - they supply the products which are in high demand from me and you and our families - our entire lifestyle is built around them. So what needs to change is our life styles, philosophy, economic order .. drastic changes.

Consumerism needs to go, tourism needs to go, advertising needs to go, travel and logistics needs to be reinvented, industrial production needs to drop by orders of magnitude, everything replaced with healthy and efficient alternatives.

How can this be done peacefully is beyond me, it probably can't. We've had precedent during covid, when the whole world stopped because everyone was scared that they're going to die. It's not so different now.

zzgoabout 1 hour ago
> How can this be done peacefully is beyond me

What you're proposing (ending consumerism, tourism) is nothing short of revolutionary. I don't imagine that the future is going to be bloodless with or without a revolution.

adrithmetiqa42 minutes ago
I’m convinced one of the best ways is to make the right choices financially easier, and make the wrong ones (much) more expensive. Fully subsidise trains and tax the crap out of flying. Do the same for cars running on fossil fuels Tax carbon heavy foods like meat. Repeat until this starts changing consumer behaviour
epolanskiabout 1 hour ago
Seriously, how do you fix it?

The biggest issue that keeps accelerating climate change is that people buy too much stuff, travel too much, and more importantly eat in a way that is bound to destroy the climate.

Now go tell people to buy less crap, use more public transport and stop filling their mouths with beef and fish every day, good luck.

And even that would merely slow the progress, not stop or revert climate change.

Sincerely this is a disaster, each generation just keeps doing worse than others, gen z may actually be the firsts to really give 2 damns, or pretend better.

nozzlegear32 minutes ago
> Seriously, how do you fix it?

Temporary SO₂ injection to treat the symptoms while we continue to make progress on transitioning to green energy.

sajithdilshan11 minutes ago
> Temporary SO₂ injection

Inject where? to atmosphere? Are you dumb or slept in the chemistry class? This would result in sulfurous acid rain

Andr2Andrabout 1 hour ago
Side by side images of exactly the same places one year apart would have been much better than the images in the article - combining left and right part from 2 years. Maybe it's just me, but the satellite images mostly were hard to read
layer810 minutes ago
They are the same place, you’re supposed to compare using the slider. What bothers me more is that the left and right images seem to have a different color temperature.
c7b35 minutes ago
Also strange that they chose palace of Versailles as the first example, of all places. To show how meticulously they're watering their gardens?
brugidouabout 1 hour ago
There's a slider in the middle you can use to see before/after
Andr2Andr16 minutes ago
Oh! Then it makes sense! Missed that
bix6about 1 hour ago
Gonna plug supercool here, making it rain! If you can help please reach out.

https://supercool-earth.com/

TacticalCoderabout 2 hours ago
So in Western Europe we're fucked by first having heatwaves (and fires everywhere) and, indeed, every field around me is yellow instead of green...

And then, when the AMOC shall start running amok, we'll be forever in extreme cold.

Where should I flee?

netsharc4 minutes ago
What, like an economic migrant?
dwedgeabout 3 hours ago
The headline is a bit sensationalist. Scorched means burned not just dry, later it mentions that some of the images are scorched from wildfires, but that doesn't seem to correlate to the one shown under the headline.
CornishPastyabout 3 hours ago
According to the Cambridge dictionary it's a perfectly normal usage of the word, in fact it's pretty much the example for it...

https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/scorched

AngryDataabout 2 hours ago
In my part of the midwest scortched is correct. People say their lawn is scorched by the sun during droughts.
undersuitabout 3 hours ago
Scorched is being used correctly. Fire does not have to be involved, heat does.
muvlonabout 1 hour ago
I'm in Europe, the sky here is literally red at night from fires we are failing to extinguish. France, Spain, UK, Belgium, Germany, Croatia, Serbia are all going through this to different degrees right now.
deadbunnyabout 1 hour ago
Claiming the British state broadcaster is using the English language incorrectly is certainly a choice.

https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/scorched

margalabargalaabout 2 hours ago
The post is the BBC, scorched is the ordinary word used in British english. I agree that in American english it would be more ambiguous.
sajithdilshanabout 2 hours ago
I mean what do you expect, it's BBC. I'll eat my hat the day they actually report the facts as it is without exaggeration. I wouldn't even trust BBC without verifying the sources. Most of the time it's lying at best and propaganda at worst.
delichonabout 3 hours ago
Global fire emissions are on a downward trend, with the first half of this year at a record low in this century.

https://atmosphere.copernicus.eu/lowest-global-biomass-burni...

OlivOnTechabout 2 hours ago
We've had the hottest summer ever recorded (since the beginning of 20th century, more than 120 years ago) across Europe. There is no "downward trend), it's going up, and will be for a while.

"Drill baby drill"

Daishimanabout 2 hours ago
Due to less land clearing in other continents. Did you read the report?
Advertisement