Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚑ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

70% Positive

Analyzed from 230 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#drives#feel#disk#defragmenter#things#closing#apps#phone#seen#storage

Discussion (6 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

blobdoleβ€’4 days ago
Beautiful.

Defragmenting my drives manually is one of those things like closing apps on my phone I am not using. Everyone says there is no need to do it. It might even be slightly worse overall. I even have enough self control to avoid doing it and have for years...

But deep down in my heart, I truly FEEL like if I did it would improve things... somehow.

throwaway17_17β€’about 1 hour ago
I feel so seen right now. My partner complains about me closing apps on my phone consistently. I also have to hold myself back from defragging and continually cleaning up my storage drives.

I too am nearly certain that the positive benefits are approaching nil, but I still feel it should be helpful.

socalgal2β€’26 minutes ago
Except for some backups, all of my machines use solid state storage so I don't think there is a point for most people, is there?
bitwizeβ€’12 minutes ago
This is the most useless thing I've seen on here lately. It's not necessary on hard drives, as the page cache did a decent job of improving disk access even in the 90s, let alone with today's fast HDDs. And if you're on an SSD... it'll just burn that out faster.

I love it!

jewelβ€’about 1 hour ago
This made me think of https://e4rat.sourceforge.net/, which moves boot files into sequential runs, which was helpful on spinning disks where seeks were slow but sequential reads were fast.

Just as an idea for a feature your defragmenter could have.

(Also this is a side thought; but I wonder if AWS AMIs and EBS volumes will boot faster if also organized sequentially.)

collabsβ€’about 1 hour ago
I have a question about disk defragmenter. I've asked a couple of people before and they've said it is not possible but iirc if I stated disk defragmenter and then even so much as moved the mouse after it started it would start with the first boxes again. Do you remember this too?