Terminal-Bench-Science: Evaluating AI agents on scientific research workflows

Discussion (6 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

jerpint•32 minutes ago

The fact that opus 5 is outperforming fable is odd to me

From personal experience, opus 5 feels net inferior to fable on almost every aspect (for coding tasks)

jhbadger•12 minutes ago

This is measuring on scientific tasks though. I haven't used Fable lately but when I was playing with it when it was new its "safety" features made it practically impossible to use for biomedical science -- it once refused to work on a pipeline of mine that was analyzing pathogenicity islands in bacteria (presumably because it had guardrails to that effect to stop potential bioterrorists and the like)

akshay_akula•about 2 hours ago

Evals on actual research workflows is the right direction, most agent benches are toy tasks.

rubslopes•about 3 hours ago

I'm glad to see that GPT Sol beats Opus at least in Mathematical Sciences, because that's my need right now, and I much prefer GPT's prose style.

mlmonkey•about 1 hour ago

Sad to see no mention of Gemini ...

vatsachak•about 2 hours ago

Damn. These things aren't AGI... but I don't care.

Luna is good enough for me to give a parser spec and have it write one.

Terminal-Bench-Science: Evaluating AI agents on scientific research workflows

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion (6 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews