Advertisement
Advertisement
β‘ Community Insights
Discussion Sentiment
100% Positive
Analyzed from 296 words in the discussion.
Trending Topics
#content#onion#should#still#comments#case#ipfs#links#worth#rare
Discussion Sentiment
Analyzed from 296 words in the discussion.
Trending Topics
Discussion (10 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews
I'm not any authority here, but I'd say, there's no need for a Reddit-moment to ban it entirely.
Though it wouldn't bother me either.
Directly linked single text posts are still publicly accessible last I checked, but it's a microblogging platform littered with spam.
HN submissions are usually long-form content, so it's rare to see X links anyway.
And comments obey the voting system, so who cares whether people link to X, LinkedIn, Facebook or whatever else.
Banning X in comments would require to ban the others as well, and I think the mods and users can handle by themselves what is relevant in that case.
And in case an X submission is genuinely interesting, it won't be hard to access or infer the content from the comments or other sources.
It just means that it will happen to these alternatives as well and the lawyers have all the money from X Corp to do just that.
These open source projects circumventing X for free, unfortunately have zero chance in fighting these legal takedowns.
Browser->Tor Onion site->IPFS as storage system pull through cache->X
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49449576
Is there any frontend still standing?