Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚑ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

100% Positive

Analyzed from 296 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#content#onion#should#still#comments#case#ipfs#links#worth#rare

Discussion (10 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

Kim_Bruningβ€’about 2 hours ago
For HN, does that mean we should no longer be using X links, since most can't view them?
moritzwarhierβ€’36 minutes ago
Content from X worth sharing is rare anyway.

I'm not any authority here, but I'd say, there's no need for a Reddit-moment to ban it entirely.

Though it wouldn't bother me either.

Directly linked single text posts are still publicly accessible last I checked, but it's a microblogging platform littered with spam.

HN submissions are usually long-form content, so it's rare to see X links anyway.

And comments obey the voting system, so who cares whether people link to X, LinkedIn, Facebook or whatever else.

Banning X in comments would require to ban the others as well, and I think the mods and users can handle by themselves what is relevant in that case.

And in case an X submission is genuinely interesting, it won't be hard to access or infer the content from the comments or other sources.

rvzβ€’about 4 hours ago
This was obviously going to happen once Nitter got an immediate C&D.

It just means that it will happen to these alternatives as well and the lawyers have all the money from X Corp to do just that.

These open source projects circumventing X for free, unfortunately have zero chance in fighting these legal takedowns.

flotzamβ€’about 4 hours ago
Hoping we'll see more resilient development/hosting emerge
toomuchtodoβ€’about 4 hours ago
Probably the best use case for onion routing and IPFS. Each X URL gets a content addressable IPFS URL, served via an onion site that should be hard to take down.

Browser->Tor Onion site->IPFS as storage system pull through cache->X

flotzamβ€’about 3 hours ago
Or just a .onion for the frontend and code forge + another server at some clearnet domain proxying it (until taken down and replaced with the new one) would probably work fine. The hidden service can even terminate TLS with a valid cert for the clearnet domain.
ChrisArchitectβ€’about 4 hours ago
Related discussion and predictions (2 days ago):

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49449576

flotzamβ€’about 4 hours ago
Seemed worth a new post, now that they actually killed it today :(

Is there any frontend still standing?

zImPatrickβ€’about 3 hours ago
Nitter itself is still fine, there are like 2 public-ish instances Iβ€˜m aware of but I think people should go out and host some in more private communities/run one over Tor or something