Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚑ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

0% Positive

Analyzed from 126 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#incident#written#paragraph#declare#sev#service#llm#writing#pangram#opening

Discussion (5 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

jen729wβ€’about 1 hour ago
Which is why the only people authorised to declare an incident are your incident managers. They follow the published guidelines which dictate what's a Sev 2 and what isn't.

A manager of a service may not declare their own service a Sev 2. If they can, your incident management process is broken.

mh-β€’about 1 hour ago
I don't usually comment about LLM-written articles, but it feels like an especially bad idea to do so in an article where you promote a book you're writing. Will that be LLM output, too?

https://www.pangram.com/history/9c8f8da8-0b4d-48d6-be23-9e8a...

woozlewuzzleβ€’about 1 hour ago
I wonder how it determines that part of the text was AI written
mh-β€’about 1 hour ago
Not sure, but I intentionally included the opening paragraph because I spotted the writing style switch when I got to the second paragraph. So then ran it on Pangram to confirm.

edit: to be clear, if you click the details, the "70%" refers to the fact that it thinks the opening paragraph is human written (or edited), and the rest is 100% AI with "high confidence".