Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚑ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

100% Positive

Analyzed from 339 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#ports#enough#saturate#pci#something#network#home#cluster#while#apparently

Discussion (13 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

pyrolisticalβ€’17 minutes ago
Nic needs pcie5 x16 slot, so on am5, take out your gpu
wrsβ€’about 1 hour ago
I haven’t been directly involved in networking for a while, so it was funny to tune back in and see that now not only is 10Gbps apparently no big deal, they even put it on the management interface!
buckle8017β€’27 minutes ago
Noting actually says those ports have to be for management.

Most people probably would use them for something else.

avidiaxβ€’about 1 hour ago
Is there an actual use for this in a homelab? Isn't 25gbps enough that no SSD will saturate it?
toast0β€’20 minutes ago
I purchased my SSD based on price and I have a AM4 APU so I'm limited to pci-e 3, but a quick check with crystaldiskmark says I'm hitting about 3.6 GB/s on sequential reads in seq1m q8t1 ... That would saturate 25gbps (assuming you have the right access patterns). seq1m q1t1 does 2.3 GB/s on my system, close enough to 25 gbps.

By my math, pci-e 5.0 should do 4x the throughput, so if you had 4 pci-e ssds you wanted to serve over the network and you had the pci-e lanes, you could saturate 400 gbps.

I'm pretty happy with my little baby network with a handful of 10G and 2.5G ports, and I'm cheap so if I made a big upgrade it'd probably be something used that has more 10g ports plus a 40G I could DAC to the adjacent home server ... but my home servers are barely powerful enough to push 10g anyway.

wtallisβ€’35 minutes ago
Please be careful with units. There are high-end consumer SSDs that will deliver data at 14+GB/s, which is much higher than 25Gb/s.
MarkSweepβ€’about 1 hour ago
The second sentence of the article:

> We have a number of these now and have been running our RDMA network backend for the 8x NVIDIA GB10 cluster for several months now, using one.

I have a friend who uses something similar for his 4 NVIDIA GDX Spark cluster.

avidiaxβ€’about 1 hour ago
I see, so only if you are running an AI cluster. And what is it transferring between the nodes? Partial computations?
ericdβ€’about 1 hour ago
Essentially, yes. The DGX Sparks, at 128 gigs for ~$4700 are one of the cheapest ways to get enough high-ish speed memory cobbled together to run one of the more capable open weight models to run at home/for a small biz. This switch lets you combine the memory of 2-4 of them.
hgoelβ€’about 1 hour ago
DGX Sparks have 200Gbps interlinks for clustering. Apparently switches are the only practical way to scale such clusters beyond 2 nodes even though each Spark has 2 such ports.
corvadβ€’about 1 hour ago
I mean at lot of what a homelab is experimenting. For example I have an absurd amount of communication 56GbE Mellanox switches but never really saturate it.
iso1631β€’about 1 hour ago
> While $1100 is not a low number

It really is when you're talking 400G.

OK there's very few ports on this, but in general if you're looking at 400g interfaces. $1100 won't even get you a genuine Arista 400G passive DAC.