Advertisement
Advertisement
β‘ Community Insights
Discussion Sentiment
100% Positive
Analyzed from 299 words in the discussion.
Trending Topics
#carbon#capture#https#lng#com#field#almost#always#projects#here
Discussion Sentiment
Analyzed from 299 words in the discussion.
Trending Topics
Discussion (4 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews
Other existing large scale carbon capture is similar; capturing otherwise vented CO2 from LNG fields.
The expense comes with sequestration - pushing CO2 underground into ??
The worlds largest CCS project, the Gorgan LNG field, is doing some magic to inject back into its LNG extraction field, likely as part of the pressurisation scheme to extract more LNG. It would appear that something similar might be happening here as the captured gas is being shipped to a standalone Norwegian company.
* https://totalenergies.com/company/projects/carbon-capture-an...
* https://energy.ec.europa.eu/news/commission-inaugurates-euro...
* https://norlights.com/what-we-do/
There's little mention of the partners (Shell, et al.) nor of any field extraction ... but it bears looking into.
---
Other ways of funding / powering sequestration exist and have yet to be explored fully (investors ??), eg: pushing carbonated water into ultramafic rock to kick start "artificial" production of natural geologic hydrogen:
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultramafic_rock
* https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S036031992...
which could very well turn a profit generating electricity directly from excess hydrogen (over and above that used to power a plant)
As always, remember that slick carbon credit schemes are almost invariably bullshit - the details matter and the tell is whether there is any actually significant and ongoing drawn of CO2 from the atmosphere: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4IW1J2_masg
The zero sum logic behind a survivable environment is just madness.