Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚑ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

100% Positive

Analyzed from 137 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#license#google#open#means#code#author#info#seems#comments#surprisingly

Discussion (7 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

FabCHβ€’about 1 hour ago
Surprisingly many people in the linked Reddit thread seem to think that open source license means Google can re-license the code and strip the author info.

Which is the one thing you absolutely cannot do.

bitpushβ€’5 minutes ago
I took a look at the code, and it seems the author info was in pyproject.toml which is not license.

if there was a comment that said // TODO(username) and google removed all comments, is that violating any license?

bananaflagβ€’28 minutes ago
They confuse it with public domain, which means exactly that.
gnabgibβ€’33 minutes ago
Discussion (147 points, 4 days ago, 27 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49668181
hungryhobbitβ€’34 minutes ago
Sounds like they need a good copyright lawyer.

It seems like an open and shut case, and I hear this Google company might have a few $$$ to pay for a settlement ...

augment_meβ€’23 minutes ago
We are beyond this now, if you complain, they can have an agent rewrite it and then it's not copied anymore. It doesn't matter and the bigger wallet wins, let it go.
MarleTangibleβ€’about 1 hour ago
We were blaming Bambu Lab, but apparently Google is no different.