Advertisement
Advertisement
β‘ Community Insights
Discussion Sentiment
60% Positive
Analyzed from 328 words in the discussion.
Trending Topics
#age#discord#pretty#implementation#governments#without#still#video#card#biometrics
Discussion Sentiment
Analyzed from 328 words in the discussion.
Trending Topics
Discussion (11 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews
That made me feel better that Discord didn't need to store my ID or video of my face, and was only storing the results of some analysis and not the inputs.
- give us your ID
- give us your biometrics
- give somebody, not necessarily Discord, a valid credit card
That's sll of the paths.
The issue comes down to if governments accept such a (urgh) comparatively lax implementation. It's pretty clear to me that the primary purpose of these laws are entirely to... force all citizens to identify themselves across the internet for the purpose of profile building, and nothing to do with child safety.
So as implementations go; this one is pretty decent. We should stop governments from passing these darn laws though.
I'd like to see details about their model there, but account age is at least better than a lot of systems like steam are doing for this.
Translation: we've found an excuse to hold our captive users hostage for their monetizable personal information, and we're leaping at the opportunity. Nothing obligates us to demand this data, but we deeply covet it.
> "We're launching this over the course of this week, so it may take a few days to..."
Translation: we'd like to limit the PR impact of our hostile acts by staggering them temporally, so that our users can't effectively coordinate social media protests.