Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

100% Positive

Analyzed from 971 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#pcie#thunderbolt#fiber#https#com#cable#still#optical#www#cables

Discussion (37 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

buildbotabout 3 hours ago
Blog post for people who prefer reading: https://hackaday.com/2026/04/11/implementing-pcie-over-fiber...

While at a higher level, thunderbolt and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ExpEther can both of course work over fiber too!

(Q|O)SFP are basically just raw high speed serial interfaces to whatever - you see this a lot in FPGAs, you can use the QSFP interfaces for anything high speed - PCIe, SATA, HDMI…

dcrazyabout 3 hours ago
> Although we can already buy commercial transceiver solutions that allow us to use PCIe devices like GPUs outside of a PC, these use an encapsulating protocol like Thunderbolt rather than straight PCIe.

> [snip]

> As explained in the intro, this doesn’t come without a host of compatibility issues, least of all PCIe device detection, side-channel clocking and for PCIe Gen 3 its equalization training feature that falls flat if you try to send it over an SFP link.

So, uh… what’s the benefit? How much overhead does Thunderbolt really introduce, given it solves these other issues?

tnt246about 2 hours ago
I go over it in the video but yes, active thunderbolt is probably a very good choice for a lot of people. I went into another direction for some reasons that are not applicable to everyone:

- Learning : I want to learn about the lower level of PCIe and it's a good project. - Re-use of cabling : I have a bunch of single mode fiber bundle going around already. You can't find thunderbolt that just have a LC connector ... - Isolation : Active thunderbolt cable still often have copper for some low speed signals, they don't offer true galvanic isolation - Avoid dealing with thunderbolt. I want a custom chassis/pcb at one end and chips to convert from TB back to PCIe are not readily available to make custom stuff with ... (not as an individual anyway).

So yeah, if you want a ready to use solution, TB cable is absolutely a good choice, here I'm having some fun, learning in the process and hopefully sharing some of the knowledge.

dcrazyabout 1 hour ago
Hey, I love a great self-educational deep dive. Don’t have time to watch the video until after the workday, but it sounds enlightening! (I swear that was not intentional.)
jmyeetabout 2 hours ago
The benefits are twofold: physical colocation and bandwidth.

Thunderbolt 5 offers 80Gbps of bidirectional bandwidth. PCIe 5.0 16x offers 1024Gbps of bidirectional bandwidth. This matters.

TB5 cables can only get so long whereas fiber can go much farther more easily. This means that in a data center type environment, you could virtualize your GPUs and attach them as necessary, putting them in a separate bank (probably on the same rack).

dcrazyabout 1 hour ago
Active optical (yes!) Thunderbolt cables can be much longer. After all, optical fiber was the original medium for Thunderbolt, back when it was still called Light Peak.

I couldn’t find any optical TB5 cables, but here’s a 4.5m TB4 one: https://www.owc.com/blog/the-new-superlong-40gb-s-owc-active...

And if TB3 is enough, Corning makes them in lengths up to 50m: https://www.corning.com/microsites/coc/oem/documents/ocbc/OE...

As for bandwidth, the medium transition seems to actually limit the author’s capabilities by losing some of the more advanced link-training features that are necessary for the highest-bandwidth PCIe 3 connections, never mind PCIe 5.

mikepurvisabout 2 hours ago
"same rack" should still be fine for 1m passive TB5 cable though, right?
conspabout 2 hours ago
> 1024Gbps

Good luck getting a 1Tbit tranceiver. Anydirectional. Also it's 512Gbitish per direction.

felixfurtakabout 1 hour ago
Nothing new here. Samtec were doing this in 2017 https://www.samtec.com/support/videos/pcie-over-fiber-with-f...
parl_matchabout 1 hour ago
and consumer/prosumer pcie encapsulation over thunderbolt over fiber was happening in 2015. maybe even earlier

still, it's incredibly cool for one guy to pull this off on his own. demonstrates mastery of the subject

ktm5j39 minutes ago
Does it have to be new?
mmastracabout 4 hours ago
This was a super interesting video to watch. I honestly thought SFP required more setup, but this explains why AliExpress is so ripe with USB3 and HDMI over SFP converters that are dirt cheap.
jauntywundrkindabout 2 hours ago
It's been amazing having 6 years of fiber optic HDMI & DP monitor connections, that work so so so well. I bought some no name one on Amazon in ~2019 and was flabbergasted it was real & worked.

Such a huge upgrade from the heavy thick 35 ft HDMI<->dvi cable I've used for so long.

Literally the only downside is figuring out how to roll it up, which I still haven't figured out how to do well with the 150ft cable I have.

It was astoundingly cheap too. I think the first one I got was under $60?! No one really knew the segment existed, they just needed to get some sales, I assume. I heard usb3 has been available but they've been bulky & expensive. Where-as the whole fiber optic cable seamlessly integrates the transceiver on mine. I like Cable Matters, they make some fine ones.

aheppabout 2 hours ago
How does this compare to something like RDMA over Converged Ethernet (RoCE)?
pncnmnpabout 2 hours ago
A fun tangent - if someone wants to explore how Azure is performing RDMA over RoCEv2 - check this paper out - https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/wp-content/uploads/...

There is an interesting NSDI talk on the paper too - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kDJHA7TNtDk (2023)

KeplerBoyabout 2 hours ago
It seems rather educational.
fl4regunabout 3 hours ago
Cool project! PCIe itself I think is likely to end up doing something similar soon, there are provisions in the spec now for optical retimers.
system2about 2 hours ago
I love the Neon Genesis background, awesome project too.
ecshaferabout 2 hours ago
The neon genesis background plus this awesome technical breakdown feels so early 2000s.
whalesaladabout 3 hours ago
So you're saying I can put a handful of 4090's out in the middle of snowy Michigan with a handful of OM4 cables snaking into my basement to run legit arctic cooling with no noise?
throwaway270925about 2 hours ago
Better yet, keep it inside and save big on heating!
myself248about 3 hours ago
No part of Michigan is in the arctic, but sure, outside of mosquito season, that would work.
greenavocado42 minutes ago
What you meant is you will have your GPU rig running passively cooled inside the pond tethered to your pier in your back yard
preisschildabout 3 hours ago
Might as well put your entire computer outside and use thunderbolt/usb-4 over fiber docks
phendrenad2about 3 hours ago
Watercooling loop light be better, the radiator fins will still rust from condensation.
benjojo12about 3 hours ago
I mean yes, but you could also just place the entire computer out there as well
russdillabout 3 hours ago
There's a number of optical modules for TB3 and TB4, might be an easier (but less fun) route as TB3 and TB4 can carry PCIe.
jauntywundrkindabout 1 hour ago
Amusingly PCIe is talking CopprLink now, which is amusing because it also the expected basis for future optical work (yet has coppr in the name). I'm honestly not sure what if anything it brings vs OCuLink, if relaxes timings at all/allows latency, or if it's just specifying connectors etc. https://pcisig.com/blog/pcie%C2%AE-cabling-%E2%80%93-journey... https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/gpus/copprlink-de...

Worth noting too that well respected vendors have been selling optical thunderbolt cables for a while now. I wonder if they are length limited for latency reasons (& hello hollow core fiber)? I wonder if they are usb3/multiprotocol, or if they are usb4 only. I also wonder how they handle the incredibly jank usb4 requirement to also have a separate legacy usb2. As a usb-c enjoyer, I can still admit: sure seems like USB is a lot of work to support! I can't help but wonder how blissfully simple a future CXL over cable stack might look by compare. https://www.owc.com/solutions/usb4-cables