Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

50% Positive

Analyzed from 90 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#disorder#functions#don#author#local#doesn#understand#post#seems#studying

Discussion (1 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

npinsker25 minutes ago
I don’t understand this post.

It seems like the author is studying “disorder” in an array by restricting themselves to looking only at local differences. They make up a lot of reducer functions, many of which relate to each other. But I don’t see the usefulness in playing with them — as none of the individual functions are ever useful. The author even says in their article about Amp that it doesn’t really work.

Basically all the functions only observe local behavior, but to measure “disorder” in a sensible way you need to take into account global relationships; the disorder of 2-3-4-5-6-5 is different than that of 2-3-4-5-6-1. There doesn’t seem to be a proposed way around this, but maybe I missed something.