Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

100% Positive

Analyzed from 392 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#models#https#audio#stability#model#stableaudio#com#open#gave#away

Discussion (14 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

evmaki37 minutes ago
Great release! It's awesome that they trained smaller models. With some effort I was able to get them running on my generative sampler/groovebox project this morning (shameless plug: https://engram.audio)

Also appreciate the attention to detail with licensing in the training set. This is an important sticking point – both commercially and ethically – for any product that integrates this type of model.

svantanaabout 4 hours ago
Blog post: https://stability.ai/news-updates/meet-stable-audio-3-the-mo...

A bit bizarre that there's not a single audio example in that post. But the model is available on their gen-AI service: https://stableaudio.com/

infrusetabout 1 hour ago
"Two early 20th century authors are talking while walking downtown Paris, occasionally noticing landmarks, while we hear horse hooves as well as a few cars"

https://stableaudio.com/1/share/b4eeaa11-cf29-4e09-88cd-a058...

SequoiaHope6 minutes ago
Wow that’s remarkably nonsensical.
rafadcabout 2 hours ago
It is insanely fast. Less than 2 seconds for 120 seconds of audio in my 3090.

It sounds too much like general midi. It is better for electronica than for any other genre.

Impressive nonetheless

hununuabout 3 hours ago
Are the released models models useful? I'm worried about their description of the output. I haven't had a chance to try them yet and unable to run them on hugging face at the moment. The https://stableaudio.com/ sample on their website could be used as sample materials for song making but definitely lacking frequency range expected today as a final product.
nullbyteabout 4 hours ago
"We also support inpainting, enabling targeted audio editing and the continuation of short recordings."

I didn't know there were models for that. Very cool!

vessenesabout 3 hours ago
This is a very small item, but I found it interesting that the paper does not credit Stability AI in the author bylines.
0gsabout 3 hours ago
hmm stableaudio.com seems to be dead tho? at least it is for me
echelonabout 4 hours ago
Stability.ai is still around?

I thought they died because they gave away everything for free with no revenue model.

Emad trained a lot of really great models, but he just gave them away. This cost enormous sums of money.

I wish for a world where Stability gave away the weights, but had a monetization loop to keep going. Imagine if we had OpenAI, Anthropic, and Stability to counter Google. And imagine if the US had a sizable open weights company.

whywhywhywhyabout 1 hour ago
Think it's more they died because they fumbled Stable Diffusion 2 and 3, also the seemingly the real image talent left to Blackforest Labs plenty of others are doing ok shipping open models.
victorbjorklundabout 2 hours ago
There are plenty of companies with open weights.
echelonabout 2 hours ago
I'd really love a list if you're offering.
waffletowerabout 2 hours ago
Interesting that Google is the counter target in your mind. Anthropic is the only company mentioned that doesn't release any open weight models -- as a so-called "public benefit corporation" this is arguably a glaring lack.
refulgentisabout 3 hours ago
I wonder if we just discovered that we’re living in that world. :)

(To fill in some gaps: they’ve consistently had a revenue model, first subscriptions to use their models commercially then fixed-floor cost per generation with revenue sharing with them)