ES version is available. Content is displayed in original English for accuracy.
Advertisement
Advertisement
⚡ Community Insights
Discussion Sentiment
0% Positive
Analyzed from 526 words in the discussion.
Trending Topics
#consent#connection#utiq#connections#vodafone#providers#orange#sfr#same#supported

Discussion (10 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews
Two things that make Utiq absolutely terrible (and imho illegal)
1. It's crazy that any person who is using my internet connection (guest wifi?) can give "consent" that leads to everyone else being tracked.
2. ISPs are abusing their highly privileged position. It's not easy to switch providers (if at all possible), so as "gatekeepers" they should behave responsibly (c.f. DMA designated Gatekeepers etc) and not abuse their power.
It is not particularly difficult to switch to providers that have their own local connections if they supply your area either (in the UK, at least).
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goatse_Security#AT&T/iPad_emai...
But also:
> The Utiq technology is linked to the internet connection. This means that anyone using the same connection will have access to the same consenthub view and will be able to manage Utiq consents given when using that connection. For example, when you share broadband connection with others in your household or if you use tethering/hotspot.
And of course the consent management panel is behind a CAPTCHA - god forbid someone automate revoking consent! I'm guessing no CATPCHA is needed to give consent, though.
I guess I can't expect an advertising platform to work with adblockers on.
> By consenting, you confirm that you have permission from the telecom account holder to enable the Utiq technology on this internet connection.
I cannot adequately express my contempt for people who have designed and implemented this.