TechPulseTechPulse
Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

0% Positive

Analyzed from 159 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#war#times#https#www#com#sources#hit#denied#water#denying

Discussion (5 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

bhouston•about 4 hours ago
It is covered in the Financial Times and New York Times as well, but they are paywalled:

https://www.ft.com/content/155db8a4-f2ff-463b-9c6c-2b1a81047...

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/10/world/middleeast/drinking...

JumpCrisscross•about 4 hours ago
Either of these sources much more precisely cover what happened. They provide the context that we already hit desalination assets on Qeshm before (U.S. denied), and that this time we struck two water-storage tanks. (Which we’re also denying, but the Planet Labs imagery provides concrete evidence in a way the free sources unfortunately can’t pay for.)
asdefghyk•about 4 hours ago
WHy is US denying this?
quantified•about 3 hours ago
Even true things like the imminent award of an honor are "fake news" (Mark Twain Award, to Bill Maher). War crimes are, well, unseemly.
JumpCrisscross•about 4 hours ago
No clue. You’d have to look for the pattern of things the U.S. almost certainly hit and later denied.

The Al Jazeera article suggests hitting water infrastructure is always a war crime, and then references a non-binding memo, which hints at the fact that the claim is bullshit, something cursory searching confirms. That’s probably not it since both the U.S. and Iran have proudly owned up to and threatened war crimes throughout this stupid war.