Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

44% Positive

Analyzed from 849 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#monasteries#organizations#long#fit#religious#organizational#exaptation#orders#adaptability#term

Discussion (28 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

nkurzabout 1 hour ago
Maybe I'm just slow this morning, but I had trouble figuring out what this story was about. The actual title on the linked article is "Historic co-determination helps monasteries navigate digital change across three countries". It's a press release for a recent paper by Danko and Ross of the University of Zurich "Dinosaurs of the organizational landscape facing technological disruption: Liability of aging and exaptation in monastic orders". It's about how old monasteries are coping with modern technology. The paper seems to be available in full here:

Abstract

Some organizations remain adaptable across centuries while others struggle to evolve and ultimately fade into irrelevance. Only a handful of theories can explain this extraordinary adaptability. We test two competing theoretical perspectives in imprinting research: Liability of aging suggests that older organizations are at greater risk of disruption by modern technologies, but older organizations can also repurpose their imprinted structures and processes to their advantage in a process termed exaptation. To resolve this contradiction, we analyze Catholic religious orders and their monasteries. They represent the oldest extant organizations, were founded in various historical eras, and are facing contemporary challenges posed by digitalization. Our quantitative and qualitative findings indicate that the orders with historically decentralized imprints show higher adaptability in embracing digital innovation. Our results confirm that long-term adaptability is increased in organizations whose imprinted decentralized logics provide a propensity for exaptation. However, these long-standing organizations are also more wary of the negative effects of digital disruption and appear to shield their organizational core more strongly. We contribute to imprinting research by shedding light on the intricate relationship between historically imprinted organizational logics and contemporary organizational practice and highlight the often-underappreciated importance of exaptation for long-term adaptability.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004873332...

bxk76about 2 hours ago
Whats is always interesting about monestic life and its emergence (minus light sabers) is that society across cultures has created spaces for people who dont fit. This need has been recognized and supported for thousands of years.
thih9about 1 hour ago
Monasteries follow strict rules. Good for those who fit these rules but monasteries are far from a place for people who don’t fit.

I may have missed something though - I don’t see how is that related to the linked article.

MrBuddyCasinoabout 2 hours ago
And there hasn’t really been a replacement for that in modern times. This is a problem.
baxtrabout 2 hours ago
The place is called "the internet" today.
fc417fc802about 1 hour ago
Worship at the altar of free software.
lukanabout 2 hours ago
There are still plenty of religious cults out there if that is your thing, probably more than have ever been. Otherwise the "misfits" are nowdays also organizing themself to indeed fit somewhere and don't just accept to be outcasts.

Sorry, but the whole concept of "place for people who don't fit" - is really not appropriate for monasteries in general. Because they have been very strict about who can fit. Only those who are fine with this special lifestyle and fixed rituals (and fixed hierachy and dogma). And most monks had to adopt to accept, whether they liked it or not, as the alternative was starving.

ChiManabout 2 hours ago
The monks likely have the time to think about implementation, and feeling like they’re part of an institution that transcends them and that they value for its own sake, they likely have an incentive to invest effort into maintaining and improving it.

Both of these are unlike, say, corporate environments, where the core work uses up almost all available time and where most people are looking mostly to extract something from the organization.

fc417fc802about 1 hour ago
Your comment (and some others) have me imagining an alternate reality where the vatican runs the equivalent of github and all major FOSS infrastructure is maintained by religious orders. (There's probably a controversy where the catholic and islamic GPL equivalent licenses are incompatible for inane reasons.)
ajb35 minutes ago
You joke, but, leaving religion out of it, it's plausible that if the want long lived infrastructure that's maintained with integrity, it may be that tithing of some description is part of the solution. Currently the closest we have is patron, but most of those are still part of hustle culture rather than the supporters feeling a long term obligation.
skuzye25 minutes ago
The long term obligation for them is created by the very thing you wanted to leave out.
mrweasel15 minutes ago
That also sound a lot like the Amish. Take the time to think about implementation, advantages, disadvantages and the societal impact of a technology, before committing to it.
blackoilabout 3 hours ago
Religion is one of the best at marketing and fund-raising since millenias. Why is it surprising that they adapt to new tech? They have done it for printing press before that.
Avicebronabout 1 hour ago
Researchers discover that monks (who are actually human beings) can deliberate, adapt and problem solve. Together. Like adults. Crazy world we live in that this has been proven possible.
steve1977about 3 hours ago
Religion was behind the spread of printed books, at least here in Europe, so this seems in line.
andrepdabout 3 hours ago
It was also behind unspeakable acts of massive cultural destruction, so there's that.
johnp314about 1 hour ago
Oh if religion wasn't responsible for "massive cultural destruction" then mankind would have invented something else to do it (whatever is meant by "massive cultural destruction").
andrepd22 minutes ago
I disagree. When you are absolutely sure that God itself is on your side, then there is no atrocity to big to commit. I feel that religious zeal has led to some of the worst catastrophes in human history. I would put para-religious zeal in that category too, like dogmatic forms of communism.
forgetfreemanabout 2 hours ago
So was the search for condiments.
defrostabout 2 hours ago
The Spice must flow.
raverbashingabout 1 hour ago
"The beauty of their women and the taste of their food made the British the best sailors in the world."
otabdeveloper4about 2 hours ago
Source? Proofs?

Do communism and secular humanism count as "religions" here?

vitally3643about 1 hour ago
The Crusaides and literally all of British colonialism.

Do you not know anything about history?

wartywhoa23about 3 hours ago
Well, AI is the New Messiah, and very VC backed at this point, so no surprise.
recurseP2 days ago
In my country most monasteries are becoming luxury hotels so yes, they are adapting remarkably well to these times.
Keirmotabout 2 hours ago
That is not a new phenomenon, per se. The hospitality industry was shaped by monasteries, based on the Rule of St. Benedict.