Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

70% Positive

Analyzed from 1806 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#models#chinese#release#open#fable#news#digg#glm#post#more

Discussion (66 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

Reubendabout 2 hours ago
Seems like there's no official blog post with benchmark results yet. But I'm once again thankful for the Chinese AI labs for being open with their work and contributing it to the world under permissive licenses like this. The Fable 5 fiasco is just another reminder of how valuable these things are to have.
radiousabout 3 hours ago
The real news here is that Digg is still up :O
1f60cabout 3 hours ago
It came back, died, and now it's back as some kind of weird AI-focused news aggregator.
giancarlostoro10 minutes ago
Reminds me of the Perplexity news thing.
binsquareabout 2 hours ago
this sentence hurts to read
stefan_about 2 hours ago
But they have such great AI generated insights on their AI stories:

"Many users praise Zhipu for open-sourcing GLM-5.2 under MIT with a 1M context window as a major step for accessible AI, while others respond with insults and anti-Chinese hostility."

joshuatabout 2 hours ago
That's disappointing to hear, I remember the reboot news and thought they had a pretty solid team behind it. I guess gaining traction proved too difficult.
TiredOfLifeabout 2 hours ago
It died and came back again last month
SilverElfinabout 1 hour ago
I actually found some of it useful. I saw some page where it helpfully pulled tweets from well known people relating to some story. So it’s not just some slop, or that’s how it looked to me.
unshavedyak43 minutes ago
which is hilarious because i was excited when i heard Digg was coming back. Many platforms are having a difficult time with bots, mass thread manipulation, etc. I'd be interested in a platform which attempted to fix that problem. I thought that was "so obvious" that i figured it was going to exactly be Digg's play. .. nope, just another AI play, as if we are missing those these days.

No idea if zero AI/bots is even possible, but at least an attempt would have me interested. A platform like Reddit/Digg of old, offering human connection, features aimed at less toxicity, etc.

Instead they give us this AI crap :s

jurgenaut2315 minutes ago
Ahah, it used to be as much a time sink as HN
r0fl43 minutes ago
This version is peak ai slop garbage trying to game the Google algorithm
skybrianabout 3 hours ago
It seems to be basically a Twitter mirror with extra cruft?
theturtletalksabout 2 hours ago
More like a curator of all the AI news on Twitter. It’s also a great way to find trending AI projects on GitHub and elsewhere
mannycalavera42about 2 hours ago
digg goes along with slashdot and freshmeat memories. good 'ol mems
jaggederestabout 2 hours ago
... for nostalgia's sake ...

It is official; Netcraft now confirms: BSD is dying

xtracto13 minutes ago
In Soviet America, AI programs YOU.
tamimioabout 2 hours ago
That’s my thoughts exactly, had to click the home page to double check!
satvikpendemabout 3 hours ago
Released at the exact same time, 5:21 pm (Chinese time), as when Anthropic received the letter from the government banning Fable, and explicitly citing other models becoming unusable.
deklesenabout 1 hour ago
... really? are you sure about the timezones? That's kind of odd, isn't it?

Maybe the post was edited afterwards?

khalic31 minutes ago
correlation does not imply causation…
rfoo27 minutes ago
z.ai posted an announcement earlier that day (in GMT+8) saying that they will make GLM-5.2 available later today at 5:21pm so it can't be a coincidence.

Good troll.

sscaryterry27 minutes ago
it was a reaction, hence the shoddy release work...
easygenesabout 1 hour ago
This release was rushed to hang on the coattails of the Mythos drama (“hey, sorry you can’t use Fable, but try us while you wait this weekend!”) I think they planned to release next week, hence benchmarks not all being ready yet.
throwaw12about 2 hours ago
I wish they would write a blog post about capabilities of this new model, what to expect from this model, is it cheaper, is it faster or does it have better quality in the outputs.

But still, thank you for the release

khalic34 minutes ago
Given the US government’s latest stunt with Fable, this is looking more and more like the future.

Can’t rely on strategic products if they’re gated by capricious actors.

Open weight models are basically immune to that

rishikeshs16 minutes ago
will simon do the pelican thing for this as well
ortekkabout 2 hours ago
With deluge of Chinese models popping up recently, I believe there's a few issues one needs to evaluate before deciding to use these models:

- Ethics. As known, ou American frontier AI companies are incredibly ethical. And I have yet to see any interviews or blog posts by Chinese companies where they talk about how they are ethical, or at least credible HN comments about it.

- Safety. Do they covertly sabotage or at least refuse to answer questions that could help cyber- and bioterrorists in their nefarious purposes? What about ML-related questions that could help terrorists create AI models without guardrails?

- Child safety. This is especially important with "free for all" open-weight models, most of which are Chinese (ever think about why that's the case?). How are we going to do age verification and KYC with models that anyone can just download on their computer?

- Intellectual property theft. How can we be sure that no output of our American frontier AI models was used while training these Chinese models?

Frankly, there's a plethora of other issues I don't have time to get into right now. Personally, I believe distribution of Chinese models in the US should be paused until they are required to submit models to the government for review and evaluation, to make sure they are made to Anthropic/OpenAI standards.

We need legal grounds for that.

Write to your congressman, congresswoman or congressperson and urge them to stop proliferation of dangerous non-American intelligence. This is a matter of national security and needs to be acted upon as soon as possible, preferably before IPO.

revolvingthrow3 minutes ago
The funniest thing about this post is not the fact that some people took it as anything but satire, but that it’s likely very close to what the true believers at Antrophic actually think.

Ah, those wacky terrorists and their non-aligned models, trained on copyrighted data to boot. Remember, the only thing that stops a guy with an evil god-in-a-box is a guy with a benevolent god-in-a-box, and only Antrophic can lead us to the second one – but only if we act together as a nation and ban those subversive open weights models!

Xiolabout 2 hours ago
So hard to tell what is satire and what isn't these days.
monster_truck31 minutes ago
Dario you're logged into the wrong account
Aldipowerabout 2 hours ago
Yes, please ban all Chinese models in the US and stick to your US-centric stuff. Good for the rest of the world.
billyjobobabout 2 hours ago
This is great but sails far too close to Poe's Law that I predict downvotes.
somenameformeabout 2 hours ago
I missed it at first. Then reread it, and wow - this is grade A satire of the sort rarely delivered anymore, probably indeed because of exactly what you're saying.
LearnYouALispabout 2 hours ago
Well, if so it needs a little "touch" I guess
freehorseabout 2 hours ago
Before the "preferably before IPO" I honestly couldn't tell.
cyber_kinetistabout 2 hours ago
> our American frontier AI companies are incredibly ethical

Ah... sweet summer child.

> Intellectual property theft. How can we be sure that no output of our American frontier AI models was used while training these Chinese models?

The US AI models are already using pirated copyrighted material off the Internet. If Chinese models also do this, they're at least giving it back to the people by releasing their weights as open source.

foxindustrialabout 2 hours ago
_incredibly ethical_
Lalabadieabout 1 hour ago
Closed source, gated access, guzzling up all innovation budget from the country, diverting cities' limited water access, gaming the stock market and convincing leaders to cut jobs across all industries.

Truly we must protect these moral and ethical visionaries.

holoduke40 minutes ago
Is this comical satire or what? I am surprised to see such a dillusional reply. Come on. Intellectual property theft and openai rings a bell? Ethics? Ever tried uncensored versions of gemma4? LLMs have no bad or good etics. Etics are a thin layer on top. Always. You must be joking.
laoweekabout 1 hour ago
What is Amodei doing on HN astroturfing instead of trying to get Fable back online smh
jauntywundrkindabout 2 hours ago
Fear Uncertainty and Doubt, the terrormongering, is worse than the terrors. Endless denial of society & possibility & progress: begone you demons.
yieldcrvabout 2 hours ago
Chinese models are the closest shining example of their ideological system working for the world than anything else they've ever done

From my perspective

throawayontheabout 1 hour ago
i would call out reduction in extreme poverty or increased healthcare access or something but yeah the models are fine i guess
yieldcrvabout 1 hour ago
I don't consider mainland aspects to be "examples of their ideological system working for the world", it works for urban areas in China

and I don't really see their foreign investment to be doing that, I think it complements what the West has done and has high impact in areas that the West ignores or hasn't taken seriously for investment, only a history of pillaging and subsequently aid

their ideological system - usually in name alone - also relies on the whole world eventually being on it for it to work, so the models being so good and available for the people openly instead of as a closed source concoction fits really well

that's what I see and how I got there, what do you see?

hollerithabout 2 hours ago
Either that or the only reason they've been releasing the models under permissive licenses is that that the only way they have get any attention in a market dominated by American companies.

(Also, they don't need to make a profit because their system does not prioritize profit potential when making investment decisions: it prioritizes alignment with directives out of Beijing, which include keeping up with the West in strategic technologies.)

tiahuraabout 2 hours ago
Is this a parody of the Chinese-funded anti-datacenter astroturfing?
bbg2401about 2 hours ago
That you and other readers can't outright identify the comment as parody is actually quite disturbing to me.
ls612about 4 hours ago
Is it a coincidence that both MiniMax and Z.ai are releasing frontier open weights models right as the USG is trying to impose a cap on model capability offered to the public?
bontaqabout 3 hours ago
I think Z.ai rushed a bit for release, for example GLM 5.2 is only available under the coding plan right now and they didn't do a big write up. Not even some charts and graphs about its performance!

This is around when people were predicting a new GLM to come out, so a couple corners clipped in order to catch the moment. I'm using it right now and it seems decent, but I haven't done heavy work with it yet. The expanded context window is great.

wolttamabout 3 hours ago
This is typical for GLM releases.
lubujacksonabout 4 hours ago
I would say yes.

You think they were sitting on a release waiting for the right marketing moment?

bel8about 3 hours ago
Yes?

I have seen enough OpenAI and Anthropic carefuly timed marketing plays to expect it.

I would never announce GLM 5.2 in the same day as Fable or Apple's WWDC, for example.

enraged_camelabout 3 hours ago
I think it's a possibility, because labs trying to one-up each other is a fairly common phenomenon at this point. Previous Opus releases were immediately followed by GPT releases, for example. At some point the timing stops being a mere coincidence.
halJordanabout 2 hours ago
No, not really. This has been telegraphed for a long time by everyone involved. HN denizens have been unashamedly anti-ai for years now, so what makes sense is the not knowing part of this audience. Chinese models are also not frontier models.
torawayabout 1 hour ago
I still find it baffling how the idea that HN is "unashamedly anti-ai" gets repeated.

Every single model release gets submitted within minutes of an announcement and frequently break 1000+ points within an hour or two. Blog posts about vibe coding or the current flavor of harness/workflow/tool are constantly making the front page. Karpathy's latest writing/presentations or "Learn how LLMs work using X" are perennial front page content.

There were moments in 2023/2024 where all but a handful of posts on the front page were about AI (and not the Reddit r/popular "residents worried about infrasound and EM radiation near new datacenter" variety).

For example, the responses to this very recent post were overwhelmingly praising Gen AI's capabilities:

Ask HN: What was your "oh shit" moment with GenAI?

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48406174

Or this post which rocketed to 2000+ points a year ago without bothering to steel man opposing arguments:

My AI skeptic friends are all nuts

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44163063

There are counter examples of course but just because HN isn't exclusively AI hype at all times doesn't mean it's "unashamedly anti-AI".

I honestly can't think of any single topic other than the Snowden leaks in 2013/2014 that even comes close to dominating HN discussion like LLMs/GenAI from 2022 to present.

SilverElfinabout 1 hour ago
I don’t think we will know. On the one hand, labs hold back until they have something competitive enough to release. So if Fable isn’t around, it removes that pressure. On the other hand, the Chinese labs have been moving fast anyways and are obviously behind, so it’s not any more of a problem to release a model that isn’t the very best.
thefounderabout 4 hours ago
No, Dario became too tiresome and annoying that someone had to do something. Personally I hope they ban Opus too. It will only provide more support for open models development. Compare Dario horror posts with this from GLM release: “ Intelligence should be open, accessible, and ready to build with, empowering every developer, everywhere.”
bfleschabout 1 hour ago
Weird, z.ai does not resolve for me. Is there anything special about that domain?

https://z.ai

arcanemachinerabout 1 hour ago
Just tried it, works for me.
Alifatiskabout 1 hour ago
Resolves fine for me
holoduke36 minutes ago
It would be so extremely awesome if this ai would have been a Claude killer alternative and 90% of Europe cancels Claude subscriptions and subscribe on this one. It would be the dumbest move of the year by the US.
marcyb5st13 minutes ago
For personal use I already did a few months back. Dario is more competent than Sam, but even shadier (IMHO).

Anyway, switched to Openrouter through forgecode (or pi/opencode, the jury is still out on this one).

It will take a while, but I believe that also businesses will at least hedge against US companies basically being forced to geo-fence their models. For now is Fable, but they can include any model at any time.

Advertisement
testfrequencyabout 3 hours ago
Digg

edit: ouch, I’m a current Digg user. Even donated for their relaunch :(