Ask HN: What tools are you using for AI-assisted code review?

aagos about 6 hours ago 5 comments

ES version is available. Content is displayed in original English for accuracy.

My team (around 40 people who write code) is evaluating tools for AI-assisted code review. The market appears to be rife with options, so before starting a series of free trials, I’d like to ask a knowledgeable crowd. What tools or services are you using? Do you use them just for code review, or for other purposes as well, such as incident response or branch management? Why did you choose them, and what do you like or dislike about them?

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

100% Positive

Analyzed from 142 words in the discussion.

Discussion (5 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

dbour•21 minutes ago

Opencode, mainly because I appreciate how one of the founders treats the UX as a first class concern. Its a great tool to learn since it can help us pivot from the potential impending provider crisis where teams may start having to consider things outside of the large labs.

As my daily driver at home, I use Pi though because it doesn't get in your way and forces you to understand how the sauce is made.

r_p4rk•25 minutes ago

Rolled our own with OpenCode, seems to work quite well and meets the goal of being vendor agnostic :)

partsch•about 3 hours ago

Besides local review via codex and Claude code, we are using GitHub Copilot with custom instructions. We just assign it as a reviewer in GitHub and a couple minutes later, the review is done. It raises a lot of issues which are valid and which I never had found. https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/tutorials/customize-code-...

spgorbatiuk•39 minutes ago

Frankly, coding with Claude Code and having Copilot read through the PR is complementary and helps to catch some things that slipped through

coder_afrique•about 3 hours ago

claude code and github copilot