Writers and Drugs

Discussion (6 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

adm4•about 3 hours ago

I've often wondered, with a cohort (community/society) of people who do not discourage freedom of expression, how many great works would come to fruition, but instead one is held back and then set free by drugs...?

colechristensen•19 minutes ago

“There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times to develop psychic muscles.”

none2585•about 2 hours ago

Feels like there's also a connection of being brilliant and thus tortured so they turn to the escape of self medication.

smitty1e•about 2 hours ago

This is the conundrum: do the chemicals enhance or detract?

Would Coleridge have delivered "Kublai Khan" without dope?

The answer is ambiguous, but I'll take sobriety, thank you.

Fricken•about 1 hour ago

New drugs enhance. If you can get your hands on a chemical that invokes an altered state no previous artist has experienced then you're in undiscovered country.

Ken Kesey was a guinea pig in the CIA's early experiments with LSD. He went on to be amongst LSDs earliest recreational users, and that led to "One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest", which is a strikingly original and lucid novel.

sublinear•about 2 hours ago

I'm not sure it's the amount they drink, but the basic metabolic reality of aging. Everyone starts to feel it in their 30s and 40s. These writers just choose to keep drinking well past when anyone else would have slowed down or quit.

I feel like it's probably their lifestyles were not flexible enough to accommodate that kind of change without losing out on opportunities. The fear of death and stress of that life would make anyone work harder.

Writers and Drugs

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion (6 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews