Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

75% Positive

Analyzed from 381 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#naive#art#https#artist#pirosmani#niko#org#without#wikipedia#wiki

Discussion (10 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

kldavis4about 2 hours ago
In case you were wondering like me, this is visual art by an artist without formal training - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Na%C3%AFve_art
xp84about 1 hour ago
Thanks. The website itself has the most infuriatingly long and vague description (Menu->Naive art?)
dadoum34 minutes ago
One of my favorite piece of art is also regarded as naive art, even though it is a quite unique one, it's the Palais idéal [0] from Cheval.

[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ferdinand_Cheval#Palais_id%C3%...

ChrisMarshallNYabout 1 hour ago
This seems to be fairly good. It's a different style than mine, but I wish them well.

For fairly bad, may we present MOBA?

https://museumofbadart.org

diego_moita37 minutes ago
My problem with Naive Art is that it is quite repetitive and limited.

It is a bit like punk rock. After you've heard one or 2 songs from Ramones then you've heard them all. Surely, Ramones, once in a while, can be fun. But after the 3rd song I feel that all they're saying is "we wish we were the Beatles".

Similarly, naive art can be fun, almost as much as Brueghel. But after the 100th 3rd World village with rivers and palm trees I just want to go back to Rembrandt.

akoboldfrying31 minutes ago
In every context I know of, "naive" is a condescending term when applied to an adult. Do artists in this "genre" appreciate their work being labelled this way? "Unconventional" was right there. It means roughly the same thing, but without the side helping of implied... deficit.

Can an artist who submits their work to this gallery -- which features the word in its very name -- really be called "naive"?

I can't tell that the works are "naive" in any sense -- they look no better or worse to me than other artwork -- and I feel no desire to change that by "educating" myself on how "non-naive" art is supposedly better.

dostickabout 2 hours ago
This gallery is pure enjoyment!
iamanatomabout 1 hour ago
Naive art(I dont think it is naive) is exceptionally good, I really liked it. I have asked ChatGPT to generate image in the style of great artist Niko Pirosmani paintings. The ouput looks amazing, moody aesthetics.

Credits: Niko Pirosmani

Warning: (AI generated Imagery)

https://chatgpt.com/share/6a53afb8-31dc-83ee-9650-ee0628c75d...

earlyriserabout 1 hour ago
I don't get this comment by a new account and I try to keep this reply in the spirit of HN without harsh critic and open mind but it's like saying real lemonade is awesome, I just got Tang delivered by Doordash.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Niko_Pirosmani https://www.artsy.net/artist/niko-pirosmani https://louisiana.dk/en/exhibition/niko-pirosmani/

iamanatomabout 1 hour ago
Sorry, my comment was very ambiguous and seems to have backfired. I want to clarify that I'm not an artist by any means. A few months ago, I saw people littering a beautiful beach. Last week, I explored the paintings of Niko Pirosmani, and they're really good. His use of thick black creates a unique aesthetic that I really liked. When I saw the HN link, I remembered that scene and wondered what it would look like in Pirosmani's style. I know using AI for this isn't ideal, but I'm not an artist myself,I just wanted to visualize it.