ES version is available. Content is displayed in original English for accuracy.
Advertisement
Advertisement
⚡ Community Insights
Discussion Sentiment
50% Positive
Analyzed from 145 words in the discussion.
Trending Topics
#attack#analysis#guardrails#models#safety#attacker#glm#open#weight#model

Discussion (3 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews
When we started the log analysis, we first used frontier models behind commercial APIs. This did not work: the analysis requires submitting large volumes of real attack commands, exploit payloads, and C2 artifacts, and these requests were blocked by the providers' safety guardrails, which cannot distinguish an incident responder from an attacker. We ran the forensic analysis instead on GLM 5.2, an open-weight model, on our own infrastructure. This had a second benefit: no attacker data, and none of the credentials it referenced, left our environment.
While falling back to their local hosted Open Weight model, gave them the ability to analyze the attack, while also keeping their internal structure / data private.