Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

38% Positive

Analyzed from 503 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#kids#discouraged#social#media#around#don#away#together#phones#teenagers

Discussion (10 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

sandsparabout 1 hour ago
Honest question, what are kids supposed to do all day? We're taking away social media but it's not like we're rebuilding anything. I don't see Macron signing proclamations to bring back mall food courts.

Today's kids are discouraged from walking around unsupervised, discouraged from partying together, discouraged from fighting and pranks.

So we take away their phones and kids what, sit around at home? Homes where the parents are phone users ie homes without libraries, without adequate crafts.

Phone-free lifestyles require a society-wide infrastructure, and we don't have that.

anon7000about 1 hour ago
Play video games, read a book, be bored and come up with their own games. These are all fine. Social media is absolutely not more valuable than that.
sandspar40 minutes ago
Teenagers don't need solitary enrichment. They need places to hang around with other teenagers. That's what they used social media for. Now we've taken away social media, but we, the adults, haven't rebuilt places where teenagers can hang out together.

Invite your buddies over - your parents are nervously hovering. Hang out at the park - adults find you strange and might call the cops. Schools close at 3, malls gone, libraries full of homeless people.

What's going to happen is the rich kids will be fine, shuttled around from activity to activity. And the poor kids, the kids who used their phones as escapes from dull, grey homes - they'll suffer.

cromka18 minutes ago
> They need places to hang around with other teenagers. That's what they used social media for.

Sure, that's a nice metaphor, but a picture-perfect version is one with predatory Ads everywhere, weird adults pretending they're kids asking them for intimate photos, bullies coming in and out calling them names and foreign agencies trying to radicalize their political views so they hate that immigrant kid or that somewhat flamboyant boy playing with them. Meanwhile their parents pretend they don't see the problem or actually don't see the problem because they don't care about them at all. And neither does their school – unless it's one of those that began to ban phones.

andsoitis23 minutes ago
> Today's kids are discouraged from walking around unsupervised, discouraged from partying together, discouraged from fighting and pranks.

In France?

watwut6 minutes ago
> Honest question, what are kids supposed to do all day? We're taking away social media but it's not like we're rebuilding anything.

The worry that kids have nothing to do at all except social media means things went really bad. They can do all the things kids did before social media. Literally all of them are available and present in their rooms and outside.

>Today's kids are discouraged from walking around unsupervised, discouraged from partying together,

Not true in France.

> discouraged from fighting and pranks.

As they should be.

> Phone-free lifestyles require a society-wide infrastructure, and we don't have that.

We literally have that.

notabotiswear31 minutes ago
Create the demand and supply will follow...

Not that I agree with the premise that there isn't anything to do. Even if were to limit the scope to just your examples, printing presses are still around, and those screens can be used as digital alternatives.

The only missing input from society here is that it actually need to put real effort into raising its young.

sandspar7 minutes ago
It seems like people's mental model of this is:

1. Ban phones

2. ???

3. Childhood is saved!

I'm trying to figure out what Step 2 is supposed to be.

watwut5 minutes ago
Nothing at all, because all the things you claim dont exist ... exist.