Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

0% Positive

Analyzed from 200 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#around#flood#turn#drive#safety#drown#more#drivers#cars#costs

Discussion (7 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

dublinbenabout 2 hours ago
How many drivers of $150k cars die after driving into floodwaters? It costs nothing to turn around and not drive through a flood.

https://www.weather.gov/safety/flood-turn-around-dont-drown

onlypassingthruabout 1 hour ago
Arizona has a "Stupid Motorist Law" (ARS 28-910) because there are so many idiots who think they can make it across a flooded road and don't.
jojomoddingabout 1 hour ago
Is it gonna be one of those things where increased safety encourages dumb people because "it is watertight you know" so now a lot more people drive into the floods, and even though it's a smaller proportion more people in total drown.
adrian_babout 2 hours ago
> (In USA) "over half of all flood-related drownings occur when a vehicle is driven into hazardous flood water."

In this context, the advice "Turn Around Don't Drown®" seems correct.

Though perhaps the BYD solution could be more effective for dumb drivers (which, according to CDC, seem abundant).

embedding-shapeabout 1 hour ago
> It costs nothing to turn around and not drive through a flood.

Sometimes it may be the least bad option, floods can get pretty wild and extensive. Maybe someone travels around in deltas commonly and like the extra safety?

sportsracersss24 minutes ago
Yeah but Musk tweets that his cars "will briefly serve as a boat" and then all the clout chasers film themselves KO'ing their Cybertrucks in streams and salty beaches.
queSideabout 2 hours ago
I think the only thing this would solve are situations like that one episode of "The Office" where Michael drives into a lake.