Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

67% Positive

Analyzed from 387 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#ads#ublock#brave#adblockers#youtube#still#blocking#browser#firefox#don

Discussion (26 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

NeutralWanted2 minutes ago
Running Unbound on my gateway with a curated adblock list. Easy setup, network-wide ad blocking on every device / browser.
cmeacham981 minute ago
Some ads (e.g. I know YT ads used to be this way, haven't looked recently) can't be blocked at the network level because they are served from the same domain/servers as the content.
anaisbettsabout 2 hours ago
Welp, the biggest reason that I use Edge just got thrown out, time to switch to Firefox.
poulpy123about 3 hours ago
I honestly don't know how people do without ad blockers. Even with being ok with ads, they are so overwhelming that I could not use internet without blocking them
massysett39 minutes ago
I don’t use adblockers. If a site has too many ads to be usable, I don’t visit it.
WhyIsItAlwaysHN29 minutes ago
So no youtube?
NeutralWanted13 minutes ago
YouTube premium is one of the best subs you can buy if you watch a lot of YouTube. Plus you get Music.
massysett25 minutes ago
YouTube is tolerable with ads. If I found it intolerable, I would pay. Or not visit.
jmclnx37 minutes ago
I use noscript instead of an ad blocker. I find it blocks the intrusive ads. I do not mind what I view as normal ads (ie: text or link), but these video and popup ads drive me crazy. I find noscript blocks the "bad" ads.
cake-ruskabout 2 hours ago
Most laypeople I know haven't seen an ad blocker in action ever.
squigzabout 1 hour ago
I install Firefox and uBlock on friends/family devices as often as I can.
Balinaresabout 2 hours ago
In case your assumption here is that TFA is about Edge disabling adblockers: it's not. It's just removing ManifestV2 support. ManifestV3 is still supported. Despite what one might assume, MV3 does not seem to measurably diminish the effectiveness of adblockers; if anything, it improves it. (Source: https://petsymposium.org/popets/2026/popets-2026-0027.php)
LelouBilabout 1 hour ago
Isn't the main issue that for MV3 you can't have a dynamic blocklist ? And so you have to update it with an extension update ?
phire21 minutes ago
There is a dynamic API too that allows extensions to modify the blocklist at runtime.

I’ve been using UBlock Origin Lite on my iPhone for a while, and that works great, keeping itself updated from EasyList and allowing for custom rules.

In some ways it’s better, in some ways it’s worse. Sometimes you have to flip it into “complete mode” (and give it full access to modify the current site) to get good blocking.

raverbashingabout 4 hours ago
I guess it still will be the best browser to download Firefox
jmclnx36 minutes ago
Lets hope it stays that way :)

But if offered enough $, I fear it will join that no-bocker bandwagon.

biglyburritoabout 3 hours ago
It always was.
feverzsjabout 2 hours ago
Basically every chromium based browser.
olivermutyabout 2 hours ago
Brave as well?
eddythompson806 minutes ago
Brave said they’ll keep some select MV2 extensions, though that remains to be seen. Especially if it causes too much maintenance headache with upstream chromium. Also it seems that Brave now distributes these select MV2 extensions. So I’m not sure if they have forked them, or if they just repackage upstream.
feverzsjabout 1 hour ago
Brave's adblock isn't as powerful as ublock.
antonymoose20 minutes ago
In what sense? As a normie-tier user of Brave’s internal and blocker, it’s worked great. I never became a power-user of uBlock.
zamadatix36 minutes ago
It doesn't have to be so long as it still supports the above.
TiredOfLife32 minutes ago
It's ending manifest V2, not just adblockers.

uBlock Origin lite is V3 and is still supported