Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

100% Positive

Analyzed from 143 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#why#european#approach#protects#rights#personally#governments#shouldn#able#order

Discussion (7 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

pjc50about 2 hours ago
Personally I think governments shouldn't just be able to order people killed, but that's just a European view.

(really the difference between the constitutional law approach which only protects US citizens and the human rights approach of ECHR which protects humans)

bravetravelerabout 1 hour ago
herbstabout 3 hours ago
I mean we all knew the US is bombing innocent fisher man outside their jurisdiction. That is exactly what central European media seemed to agree on.

We still miss the "why" and how there are no consequences so far

Sha1rholderabout 1 hour ago
Frogs being boiled—public has gotten used to it, even numb.
vrganj19 minutes ago
Why did Russia complain about the rights of the Russian minority in Ukraine?

Why did Austria send Serbia an Ultimatum in 1914?

Why did Japanese officers blow up their own railway in Manchuria in 1931?

Why was Spain blamed for an accidental explosion on the USS Maine in 1898?

fragmedeabout 2 hours ago
But what if that fisherman possibly thought about the existence of illegal narcotics while on the boat, fishing? That's grounds for getting murdered, right?
codedokode22 minutes ago
What if a son of a senator or a president had drugs, would he be bombed too?