ES version is available. Content is displayed in original English for accuracy.
Advertisement
Advertisement
⚡ Community Insights
Discussion Sentiment
89% Positive
Analyzed from 465 words in the discussion.
Trending Topics
#open#mojo#source#rust#qualcomm#https#sourcing#programming#lot#python

Discussion (17 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews
When mojo 1.0 was announced, I looked into porting my current rust project (a very opinionated type-driven DICOM library/anonymizer that has a spec implemented in haskell) and it wasn't ready for that sort of work yet vs continuing with rust. Which is fine! The numerics side looks great. I'm glad they have reached 1.0 and open sourced.
Don't reward them with your support just because they are forced to open source something.
I do not see your point.
This is by Chris Lattner, known for LLVM and Swift.
Strategically speaking, I think this only makes sense as an anti-NVIDIA play.
So far I've been enjoying the language (pythonic, comptime, tile support) and plan to spend time using it to work with gpus to learn more, the puzzles are also pretty cool.
https://youtu.be/eFbtGDGbdFU?si=VJ0XSiuNO9Z36DtD&t=30
I remember being really interested a few years ago when it was billed as a superset of Python. I know they pivoted away from that, but I might play with it now that the compiler is also open source.