Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

0% Positive

Analyzed from 288 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#news#military#more#government#fired#subservient#mean#liberal#democracies#oath

Discussion (24 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

alfiedotwtfabout 3 hours ago
This is how you create a subservient military… well, I mean even more so
stinkbeetleabout 3 hours ago
The military is supposed to be subservient to the civilian government in liberal democracies.
jackb4040about 2 hours ago
IDK what is covered by "liberal democracies", but in the specific military at hand every individual member takes an oath to uphold the Constitution regardless of contradictory orders from the government.
voidfuncabout 2 hours ago
An oath isn't a binding legal requirement. The military reports to the government.
derektankabout 2 hours ago
This is obviously a terrible decision, but let’s be real. The overwhelming majority of US servicemembers aren’t getting their news from Stars and Stripes; they get their news from the same place everyone 18-30 gets their news, social media.
bad_haircut72about 2 hours ago
Its an avenue for people inside the organization to spread messages to other people inside the organization.
derektankabout 2 hours ago
Sure, it’s one avenue that exists along private military and national defense outlets and blogs such as War on the Rocks, Task and Purpose, Breaking Defense, Foreign Policy, etc.

I am more concerned that this change means the troubles our servicemembers are having with base HVA/C or water supplies may go unreported, than the risk of some kind of cultural conformity.

chabskaabout 2 hours ago
First they came for the niche news, and I didn't say anything because it's only 0.5% share of the viewership. Then they came for the regional news, and I didn't say anything because it's only 3.5% share of the viewership...

(How you respond to these little transgressions will determine whether your society will recover to normal or slide further into ruin)

awinter-pyabout 3 hours ago
I mean he voiced them before being fired too, it's the reason they fired him right?
JohnTHaller10 minutes ago
He was fired because he wouldn't change facts for the current administration. Same thing that happened at 60 Minutes.
mcswellabout 3 hours ago
Minitrue is here, and it works for Hegseth over at Minipax.
like_any_otherabout 2 hours ago
No more censorious than Cambridge or Ghent universities: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cevmrjd9lj1o
applfanboysbgonabout 2 hours ago
Could you tell me what Cambridge has to do with US government censorship? I'm afraid I don't quite see the connection.
like_any_otherabout 2 hours ago
There's no direct connection, only noting the spread of censorship. The more places that censor, the worse it is, since there are fewer refuges for free speech.